Page 1 of 2
Medal Count Rankings
Posted: Fri Feb 7, 2014 6:42 pm
by Raps in 4
Why is overall medal count considered more important than gold medal count in the Olympics?
I was listening to the radio today and they were talking about how Canada finished third place in 2010. That pissed me off because Canada was first in gold medals (in fact, we set the record for most gold medals ever won in a Winter Olympics). We won the Olympics yet no one recognizes it, not even our own media.
What is everyone's obsession with celebrating losers in the Olympics? No other sporting competition treats second and third place finishes equal to first.
Re: Medal Count Rankings
Posted: Fri Feb 7, 2014 8:43 pm
by Kaizen
I completely disagree with your argument and many other countries and the IOC do use gold medals in ranking countries.
Re: Medal Count Rankings
Posted: Fri Feb 7, 2014 10:10 pm
by Bank Shot
I always thought that the overall medal count thing was just an American thing? Pretty sure most other countries go by Golds.
Re: Medal Count Rankings
Posted: Fri Feb 7, 2014 11:27 pm
by kyphi
I figure it is a nationalistic pride sort of rah-rah high school thingy - I watch because I never get to see these sports on tv otherwise
Re: Medal Count Rankings
Posted: Sat Feb 8, 2014 1:04 am
by mojomarc
The Olympics are IMO about participation first, and winning second. I don't understand the idea about worrying about country ranking--it's cool and all but I just enjoy the spectacle and the fierceness of competition.
Re: Medal Count Rankings
Posted: Sat Feb 8, 2014 1:52 pm
by C.lupus
I think the USA started that total medal count thing because they never win a lot of golds in the winter games but usually get a lot of silvers and bronzes. So it's a way for the media to say USA is #1. I don't care in the least about that stuff. I just like watching these winter sports and the competition.
Re: Medal Count Rankings
Posted: Sat Feb 8, 2014 3:19 pm
by Raps in 4
C.lupus wrote:I think the USA started that total medal count thing because they never win a lot of golds in the winter games but usually get a lot of silvers and bronzes. So it's a way for the media to say USA is #1. I don't care in the least about that stuff. I just like watching these winter sports and the competition.
So I guess Canada just copied you guys then, like we do for everything else, without realizing that copying you screws us over in this case.

Re: Medal Count Rankings
Posted: Sat Feb 8, 2014 3:20 pm
by Raps in 4
Kaizen wrote:I completely disagree with your argument and many other countries and the IOC do use gold medals in ranking countries.
Just looked into it and you're right. Our media is just stupid.
Re: Medal Count Rankings
Posted: Sun Feb 9, 2014 1:43 pm
by The Duke
Most Gold is the true ranking.
The Fairest Way is most Gold -- 1st tie-breaker is Silver -- 2nd tie-breaker is Bronze
Re: Medal Count Rankings
Posted: Mon Feb 10, 2014 5:30 pm
by LLJ
mojomarc wrote:The Olympics are IMO about participation first, and winning second. I don't understand the idea about worrying about country ranking--it's cool and all but I just enjoy the spectacle and the fierceness of competition.
So innocent and idealistic.

Re: Medal Count Rankings
Posted: Tue Feb 11, 2014 8:45 pm
by Point forward
Up to now, we Germans have 5 medals, namely 4 Gold and 1 Silver. Hard to be more efficient than that

Re: Medal Count Rankings
Posted: Wed Feb 12, 2014 1:42 am
by kyphi
Point forward wrote:Up to now, we Germans have 5 medals, namely 4 Gold and 1 Silver. Hard to be more efficient than that

wunderbar
Re: Medal Count Rankings
Posted: Wed Feb 12, 2014 1:44 pm
by Captain_Obvious
Point forward wrote:Up to now, we Germans have 5 medals, namely 4 Gold and 1 Silver. Hard to be more efficient than that

Now 5 gold and 1 Silver

Re: Medal Count Rankings
Posted: Wed Feb 12, 2014 9:51 pm
by Point forward
According to the ESPN medal rankings, Germany (6G, 1S, 1B = 8, #6) is ranked lower than the U.S. (3G, 1S, 5B = 9, #4). Somehow, I feel strangely happy about this

Re: Medal Count Rankings
Posted: Wed Feb 12, 2014 9:54 pm
by LLJ
Germans seem invincible in luge.
Re: Medal Count Rankings
Posted: Thu Feb 13, 2014 1:24 am
by The Duke
Germany grabbing the medal lead for now, German engineering
They are strong in those sliding spots, luge, skelton, bobsleed, doubles, 4 man, mens and women.
Norway is good at those cross country & biathon spots plus there tons of events for mens and womens
Canada is good at short & long speed skating, hockey, curling, freestyle skiing, skating, snowboarding
Austria is good at regular skiing
Dutch us good at long track speed skating
Re: Medal Count Rankings
Posted: Thu Feb 13, 2014 5:41 pm
by Whiteman
Point forward wrote:According to the ESPN medal rankings, Germany (6G, 1S, 1B = 8, #6) is ranked lower than the U.S. (3G, 1S, 5B = 9, #4). Somehow, I feel strangely happy about this

Total number of medals is more important than number of gold medals.*
This opinion is subject to change depending on future results.
Re: Medal Count Rankings
Posted: Thu Feb 13, 2014 7:05 pm
by Point forward
Whiteman wrote:Total number of medals is more important than number of gold medals.*
This opinion is subject to change depending on future results.
As a German soccer fan who is tormented by a never ending run of 2nd or 3rd places... NO.

Re: Medal Count Rankings
Posted: Thu Feb 13, 2014 7:36 pm
by Raps in 4
Germany is running away in the standings.
Re: Medal Count Rankings
Posted: Thu Feb 13, 2014 7:46 pm
by Point forward
Raps in 4 wrote:Germany is running away in the standings.
Don't worry, that will change.

The 2nd week is dominated by snowboard, short track, figure skating and hockey where German failure is guaranteed.

Realistically, we could medal in the bob sled and *some* ski events though.