FFKL 2007-08 [Winner: east!]

writersblock · Post #201 » by **writersblock** » Fri Aug 1, 2008 1:10 pm

KalElen wrote:
writersblock wrote:
KalElen wrote:i can do lottery right now as far as i'm concerned, but i wanted to build up anticipation ( ). when would you 2 like me to do it?

How about today?

how about we vote on it

Post #202 » by **Curtis Lemansky** » Fri Aug 1, 2008 1:47 pm

How about 9th of August for lottery,and we can vote for dynasty/no dynasty until then(8 days to vote which is more than enough IMO)

Hell here is my vote: Dynasty forever.
Bam.

sacstar16 · Post #203 » by **sacstar16** » Fri Aug 1, 2008 6:30 pm

I like August 9th for the lottery. The sooner the better
I also like the idea of dynasty starting next year.

writersblock · Post #204 » by **writersblock** » Fri Aug 1, 2008 6:49 pm

I'll concur on the August 9th date, and, I think my preference for Dynasty next season has been stated.

E-DUBB · Post #205 » by **E-DUBB** » Fri Aug 1, 2008 10:33 pm

Dynasty definetly....

and lets hope my luck can change this year with a #1 pick

AlciG · Post #206 » by **AlciG** » Sat Aug 2, 2008 6:59 am

The 9th is fine for lottery and I can live with going dynasty this year

KalElen · Post #207 » by **KalElen** » Sat Aug 2, 2008 10:35 am

9th it is then, or around 9th if it should happen that i'm away on 9th

as for dynasty voting, options are:

1. we go dynasty right away and keep current rosters (though we agreed it would be a keeper league last year so some people will be at disadvantage)

2. we go dynasty next year (so everyone can prepare for it through the draft)
-writersblock
-AlciG
-nostradamus2005
-TheTorontoGM
-KalElen

3. we keep it keeper league
-Stanford
-bww78
-fraanciiscoo
-east

Post #208 » by **Stanford** » Sat Aug 2, 2008 11:40 am

AlciG · Post #209 » by **AlciG** » Sat Aug 2, 2008 4:17 pm

KalElen wrote:9th it is then, or around 9th if it should happen that i'm away on 9th

as for dynasty voting, options are:

1. we go dynasty right away and keep current rosters (though we agreed it would be a keeper league last year so some people will be at disadvantage)
-AlciG

2. we go dynasty next year (so everyone can prepare for it through the draft)
-writersblock

3. we keep it keeper league

I think I might not have been clear... I ment going dynasty from this year onwards so we can keep that in mind when drafting our rosters. Sorry about the confusion.

KalElen · Post #210 » by **KalElen** » Sat Aug 2, 2008 4:29 pm

AlciG wrote:
KalElen wrote:9th it is then, or around 9th if it should happen that i'm away on 9th

as for dynasty voting, options are:

1. we go dynasty right away and keep current rosters (though we agreed it would be a keeper league last year so some people will be at disadvantage)
-AlciG

2. we go dynasty next year (so everyone can prepare for it through the draft)
-writersblock

3. we keep it keeper league

I think I might not have been clear... I ment going dynasty from this year onwards so we can keep that in mind when drafting our rosters. Sorry about the confusion.

no prob man.

this was a misunderstanding, but even if somebody wants to change his vote it's allowed until the voting is over (on 17th)

Post #211 » by **Curtis Lemansky** » Sat Aug 2, 2008 6:41 pm

TheTorontoGM · Post #212 » by **TheTorontoGM** » Sun Aug 3, 2008 11:11 am

Post #213 » by **Stanford** » Sun Aug 3, 2008 12:28 pm

Shouldn't we redraft if we go with a dyntasy league? I don't see how it's fair to just switch out of nowhere.

Woody Allen · Post #214 » by **Woody Allen** » Sun Aug 3, 2008 1:02 pm

Stanford wrote:Shouldn't we redraft if we go with a dyntasy league? I don't see how it's fair to just switch out of nowhere.

Agreed.

writersblock · Post #215 » by **writersblock** » Sun Aug 3, 2008 2:03 pm

But the point is...we are still drafting. We're not going Dynasty this season, we're keeping our 4 keepers and then next season going dynasty. So, in essence, it's assumed that you'll have the top 4 guys you wanted anyway. The draft we have this year will just be like a continuation from the first 4 rounds of a draft. I don't see how it will hurt strategy if we transition starting next season. I think re-drafting seems even more detrimental to teams who have been working hard to get and keep certain players.

Post #216 » by **Curtis Lemansky** » Sun Aug 3, 2008 6:03 pm

writersblock wrote:But the point is...we are still drafting. We're not going Dynasty this season, we're keeping our 4 keepers and then next season going dynasty. So, in essence, it's assumed that you'll have the top 4 guys you wanted anyway. The draft we have this year will just be like a continuation from the first 4 rounds of a draft. I don't see how it will hurt strategy if we transition starting next season. I think re-drafting seems even more detrimental to teams who have been working hard to get and keep certain players.

+1

bww78 · Post #217 » by **bww78** » Sun Aug 3, 2008 8:50 pm

fraanciiscoo · Post #218 » by **fraanciiscoo** » Sun Aug 3, 2008 10:18 pm

i agree

Post #219 » by **Stanford** » Sun Aug 3, 2008 11:03 pm

You agree with WB/nos or bww/WA and I?

fraanciiscoo · Post #220 » by **fraanciiscoo** » Tue Aug 5, 2008 2:12 am

Stanford wrote:You agree with WB/nos or bww/WA and I?

with you for the 2nd time in my life

we MUST redraft if we go with a dyntasy league
or stay playing with 4keepers