FFL - 2013-14

sabonis · Post #801 » by **sabonis** » Thu Sep 5, 2013 9:14 pm

bww78 wrote:Trade with Sabonis:

I send

206 + 235

for

215 + 216

done

writersblock · Post #802 » by **writersblock** » Thu Sep 5, 2013 9:19 pm

Moultrie is an interesting pick.

Looks like we've officially entered the "Digging for Gold in Philly" stage of the draft. Seriously, that team is so bad, anyone could be worth a roster spot...and I'm certain that everyone will for at least one game this season.

sabonis · Post #803 » by **sabonis** » Thu Sep 5, 2013 9:22 pm

well they just plain suck and Moultrie is really talented. He needs to develop his post-up game against NBA bigs of course, but he has a mid range jumper and he's probably the best rebounder on the roster.

So I gambled on talent. We'll see how it turns out

writersblock · Post #804 » by **writersblock** » Thu Sep 5, 2013 9:28 pm

sabonis wrote:well they just plain suck and Moultrie is really talented. He needs to develop his post-up game against NBA bigs of course, but he has a mid range jumper and he's probably the best rebounder on the roster.

So I gambled on talent. We'll see how it turns out

That's what I'm saying. I think anyone in Philly is worth a gamble at this point.

stick · Post #805 » by **stick** » Thu Sep 5, 2013 9:42 pm

Moultrie is a nice pick.

theman · Post #806 » by **theman** » Thu Sep 5, 2013 10:27 pm

writersblock wrote:Moultrie is an interesting pick.

Looks like we've officially entered the "Digging for Gold in Philly" stage of the draft. Seriously, that team is so bad, anyone could be worth a roster spot...and I'm certain that everyone will for at least one game this season.

I can not see how Philli will not have the worst record in the NBA.

sabonis · Post #807 » by **sabonis** » Thu Sep 5, 2013 10:59 pm

stick wrote:So because big baby; an overrated, overweight, injury prone, probably going be traded; player is back for orlando... Tobias harris, who was ranked in the 30s during his stint in orl, wouldnt peak your interest until the 80s

1) I said 70-80s
2) I said "especially Davis" not just because of Davis. I said they do have depth.
3) Harris made top 45 in the last 40 days but in 40mpg. 40!! Do you really think he'll average that much for the whole season? With some depth in both SF and PF ?
4) They now have Nelson, Oladipo, Afflalo. So touches reduce even if the dip is a small amount

of course if he worked on his shot and now shooting 80% from the line etc, I'm sure his value will increase accordingly, but I don't think he'll average 18 and 9.5. Do you?

Breakdown777 · Post #808 » by **Breakdown777** » Thu Sep 5, 2013 11:10 pm

Cyrus wrote:
Curtis Lemansky wrote:
Cyrus wrote:Cy Select with 199) Jason Richardson

http://www.thescore.com/home/articles/1 ... for-season

I'm gonna go ahead and call this one a bad pick.

lol didn't see this at all, can i change it lol.

If it was up to me: Yes.
If we are going to put it to a vote: I vote Yes.

I think that we all enjoy the most competitive league possible, I think giving you a do-over accomplishes and enforces that.

hamncheese · Post #809 » by **hamncheese** » Thu Sep 5, 2013 11:16 pm

My thinking is if the rest of my team is good enough to make the playoffs, Blatche will be playing some decent minutes as Kidd starts resting his starters for the post-season.

Post #810 » by **jazzfan1971** » Thu Sep 5, 2013 11:24 pm

i want a do over on sullinger then.

Woody Allen · Post #811 » by **Woody Allen** » Thu Sep 5, 2013 11:28 pm

I want to go back in time and tell Jfrost to draft Amir Johnson and not Tyreke Evans with his pick to make a trade for Iguodala.

stick · Post #812 » by **stick** » Thu Sep 5, 2013 11:53 pm

sabonis wrote:
stick wrote:So because big baby; an overrated, overweight, injury prone, probably going be traded; player is back for orlando... Tobias harris, who was ranked in the 30s during his stint in orl, wouldnt peak your interest until the 80s

1) I said 70-80s
2) I said "especially Davis" not just because of Davis. I said they do have depth.
3) Harris made top 45 in the last 40 days but in 40mpg. 40!! Do you really think he'll average that much for the whole season? With some depth in both SF and PF ?
4) They now have Nelson, Oladipo, Afflalo. So touches reduce even if the dip is a small amount

of course if he worked on his shot and now shooting 80% from the line etc, I'm sure his value will increase accordingly, but I don't think he'll average 18 and 9.5. Do you?

I think the safe bottom is his march numbers

Post #813 » by **floppymoose** » Fri Sep 6, 2013 12:40 am

Nate lasted amazingly long. I think he'll easily exceed that daft spot. No one's been able to keep him off the court the last two years - he's playing better basketball than he used to.

writersblock · Post #814 » by **writersblock** » Fri Sep 6, 2013 1:18 am

jazzfan1971 wrote:i want a do over on sullinger then.

If we're doing do-overs, can I start over and pick guys Ham likes?
I kid

fraanciiscoo · Post #815 » by **fraanciiscoo** » Fri Sep 6, 2013 2:50 am

jazz check your email pls

hamncheese · Post #816 » by **hamncheese** » Fri Sep 6, 2013 2:56 am

writersblock wrote:
jazzfan1971 wrote:i want a do over on sullinger then.

If we're doing do-overs, can I start over and pick guys Ham likes?
I kid

You know what, I like all of the guys you picked individually, not just the fit. I think you got very good value with Pau at #45 and I do see Vucevic as a double double type in Orlando. I may not have him with as many rebounds as you think he might have but me thinking he gets 13 rpg v. 15 rpg, doesn't not mean I don't like him and at 36 is a fine draft spot.

Rubio at 23 I think is too early but I like Rubio this year for steals and assists. Sure, he's a drag in scoring and fg% but rebounds great for a pg. I like Monta too. Just drafted him in the BOSF, and think he can have really good fantasy season in Dallas. Vasquez, you know I like, because I was interested in him (but in the 90's). Vasquez would've been a great fit on my team (though he pairs well with Rubio). I think you took him way too early relative to when anyone else would take him because he has some negatives that ultimately lowers his value.

You acquired Matthews for Mayo, and in a vacuum, I prefer Matthews over Mayo, but one of his strengths in 3's is wasted on your team. I like Henson the player, but I don't like that he probably won't get enough minutes in Milwaukee to justify taking him at 143. On the other hand, I think Fournier at 156 and Rush at 193 are fine picks.

fraanciiscoo · Post #817 » by **fraanciiscoo** » Fri Sep 6, 2013 6:10 am

trade to announce

I send Reggie Jackson
I get sullinger

and the other way around to jazzfan

nice dealing with you sir

Post #818 » by **jazzfan1971** » Fri Sep 6, 2013 6:12 am

fraanciiscoo wrote:trade to announce

I send Reggie Jackson
I get sullinger

and the other way around to jazzfan

nice dealing with you sir

Yeah, I just didn't like all the risk with Sully. He'll probably be suspended 5 games and come back stronger than ever, but, you just never know. Plus I was pretty high on Reggie Jackson anyway, so it wasn't a huge step back for me.

fraanciiscoo · Post #819 » by **fraanciiscoo** » Fri Sep 6, 2013 6:34 am

jazzfan1971 wrote:
fraanciiscoo wrote:trade to announce

I send Reggie Jackson
I get sullinger

and the other way around to jazzfan

nice dealing with you sir

Yeah, I just didn't like all the risk with Sully. He'll probably be suspended 5 games and come back stronger than ever, but, you just never know. Plus I was pretty high on Reggie Jackson anyway, so it wasn't a huge step back for me.

I think you got to say i accept

Post #820 » by **jazzfan1971** » Fri Sep 6, 2013 7:01 am

Yea I accept.