Wimbledon 2009

A place to talk about sports that are not covered by other forums and the gateway to other sports getting their own forums.

Moderators: Doctor MJ, kdawg32086

Bank Shot
RealGM
Posts: 16,228
And1: 11,932
Joined: Jun 24, 2007

Re: Wimbledon 2009 

Post#41 » by Bank Shot » Sun Jul 5, 2009 7:45 pm

Wow, what a match. What a follow up to last year's final.

First off, what an effort by Roddick. I've never seen him play as well as he did the last two matches. I was fully expecting a straight sets win for Roger. I've never been a fan but I gained a lot of respect for Andy today. He's got to be kicking himself for blowing that second set tiebreaker. He lost the match right there.

As for Roger, what can you say that hasn't been said? While Roddick was having the match of his life, Roger quietly had the serving match of his life. He stepped it up today and just refused to go down even though Roddick's serve looked impenetrable. He deserved to get #15 and I'm happy to see him back at #1. Awesome effort by both guys.
Bank Shot
RealGM
Posts: 16,228
And1: 11,932
Joined: Jun 24, 2007

Re: Wimbledon 2009 

Post#42 » by Bank Shot » Sun Jul 5, 2009 8:09 pm

And Grand Slam #5 for Daniel Nestor in doubles. Wooooo Canada.
Doctor MJ
Senior Mod
Senior Mod
Posts: 53,110
And1: 22,065
Joined: Mar 10, 2005
Location: Cali
     

Re: Wimbledon 2009 

Post#43 » by Doctor MJ » Sun Jul 5, 2009 8:33 pm

Amazing match. Did a real dent to the myth that Roddick is a B-lister.

Particularly fascinating for me was how the format of competitive tennis decides the winner between 2 roughly equal players. Some observations:

-Most obviously, that the total number of points won by each players is virtually meaningless in a close match.

-They kept saying how Roddick's serve was unbreakable. Not inaccurate, but there's more to it than that. Federer was the one with the more dominant service game, he just blinked a couple times. So Roddick was more likely to give up points, but less likely to give up a sting of points. You can build a story around Roddick's more dominant serve giving him more free points but Federer had far more aces than Roddick.

-Of course on that note, that Federer had so many more aces just goes to show that "aces" aren't as meaningful of a stat as "service winners". His ability to place his serve gave him more aces, but Roddick hits it so hard that he doesn't need to prevent his opponents from even touching the ball.
Getting ready for the RealGM 100 on the PC Board

Come join the WNBA Board if you're a fan!
User avatar
Batu7
Starter
Posts: 2,150
And1: 248
Joined: Jun 26, 2008
Location: Istanbul, Turkey
   

Re: Wimbledon 2009 

Post#44 » by Batu7 » Sun Jul 5, 2009 11:10 pm

Bank Shot wrote:Wow, what a match. What a follow up to last year's final.

First off, what an effort by Roddick. I've never seen him play as well as he did the last two matches. I was fully expecting a straight sets win for Roger. I've never been a fan but I gained a lot of respect for Andy today. He's got to be kicking himself for blowing that second set tiebreaker. He lost the match right there.

As for Roger, what can you say that hasn't been said? While Roddick was having the match of his life, Roger quietly had the serving match of his life. He stepped it up today and just refused to go down even though Roddick's serve looked impenetrable. He deserved to get #15 and I'm happy to see him back at #1. Awesome effort by both guys.

My thoughts exactly.
"I firmly believe that any man's finest hour, the greatest fulfillment of all that he holds dear, is the moment when he has worked his heart out in a good cause and lies exhausted on the field of battle - victorious."

- Vince Lombardi

Return to General Other Sports Talk