Doctor MJ wrote:
It's funny. I remember arguing with people here on the old all encompassing Off Topic board back when Fed only had 4 or 5 majors. People arguing he was just the next Hewitt. It was clear though. I mean, when Hewitt was #1, the grand slam coverage team just yawned and damned him with faint praise. Amazing when you've a got a 20 year old player who is best in the world, and the consensus is "He's #1 until someone good shows up." Then Fed comes along, and almost immediately the response is gushing. I remember my then girlfriend (now wife) saying about the broadcast team, "My god, they all want to f**k him." and I had to swear to him that they weren't always like that.
People in Tennis give a lot of attention at Grand Slam(how many you have).But at the end of the day you have to think who is better at what.
Some people believe Nadal has a chance to be the Greatest player ever.Sorry but in my eyes he will never be Greater than Federer and Sampras even if he win more Grand Slam than them.Federer & Sampras at technique are untouchable(especially Roger).Even Borg wasn't at this level as about the technique.
Nadal isn't so fun to watch like Roger.Not even close in my eyes.I prefer to watch even Murray than Nadal.
And Lol at them
"people arguing he was just the next Hewitt. It was clear though. I mean, when Hewitt was #1, .Roger's talent was one of a kind.
When I watched that game between him and Sampras at 2000 Wimbledon if I remember well I said to myself "This kid is scary good.He is perhaps the Next Sampras".And Sampras at that point considered by many as the Greatest ever.At 2009 Sampras
"Federer is the Greatest player ever"- Pete Sampras“Roger is just the greatest player of all time,He is the most beautiful player I’ve ever seen and I don’t ever get tired of watching him."-John McEnroeYou can't say if you know about Tennis that he is the next Hewitt because talents are different.And Roger's talent at technique is untouchable.