MIN-MEM rumor?
Re: MIN-MEM rumor?
-
PerkinsFor3
- Lead Assistant
- Posts: 5,989
- And1: 2,065
- Joined: Nov 10, 2004
- Contact:
Re: MIN-MEM rumor?
-
GopherIt!
- RealGM
- Posts: 10,599
- And1: 24,742
- Joined: Oct 20, 2007
- Location: bird watching
- Contact:
Re: MIN-MEM rumor?
younggunsmn wrote:[GopherIt would rather keep love. Most fans on various wolves boards are in favor of love for #2 IF the pick is rubio. If the pick is thabeet opinions vary considerably.
I'm not a lone wolf here. There are lots of us who think Love should be kept vs trading for the #2.
Did you ask Devilz?
GrizzledGrizzFan wrote:I honestly like the T'Wolves package better. The difference between 4 and 6 is beyond negligible. 4 & 23 < 6 & 18 & 28 - If the Grizz want Hill, he'll likely be there at 6. Personally I'd rather see Evans/Curry at 6, Hansbrough at 18. 27 & 28 could be used to move up or for vet talent (along with the Grizz's dearth of cap space and expirings)...
I like to hear that.
Let's go! Rubi oh!
Re: MIN-MEM rumor?
-
Cyborg21
- General Manager
- Posts: 8,583
- And1: 368
- Joined: Apr 14, 2005
- Location: Broken Arrow, OK
- Contact:
-
Re: MIN-MEM rumor?
I would rather keep Love than trade him for #2. The only way I want #2 is if love isn't involved...
Re: MIN-MEM rumor?
-
GrizzledGrizzFan
- Lead Assistant
- Posts: 4,571
- And1: 161
- Joined: Jul 29, 2005
- Location: Just south of Memphis, as the crow flies...
-
Re: MIN-MEM rumor?
Cyborg21 wrote:I would rather keep Love than trade him for #2. The only way I want #2 is if love isn't involved...
That's totally understandable. Just understand that as a Grizz fan, I hope your FO mistakenly deals Love to the Grizz
