dark-child wrote:I fully understand the situation we are in, but it is possible that the Grizz will be paying in excess of $20 mill a year for someone who will NEVER be an all star point guard, can we truly afford to do that? I advocate trading him, and if Gasol can't get over it, then I don't mind trading my passive center who is also over priced. Both guys are suppose to be the next step or transition for the organization and they have not performed.
The question in bold does raise alarms in me for two reasons. (1.) Conley's knick-knack injury history. (2.) Throwing money to a player who is no more of a complimentary player like Marc Gasol is. No disrespect to both guys as they have done a good job playing for the Grizzlies during their respective tenures. If the Grizzlies think that giving money to Conley go along with Gasol to help ride the Blue wave into the future, they are sorely mistaken. In the past, the Grizzlies did this before with Pau Gasol, look where that got him. Traded to L.A. to play along side a superstar in Kobe Bryant and with the help of complimentary players in Lamar Odom and Derek Fisher, they won two championships as a result.
The closest superstar the Grizzlies has is aging into the twilight of his career.

The front office failed to retool the aging squad with youth pieces to help the veterans on the roster. I put the blame on them as well as the absentee owner. For being on different pages instead of being on the same page. Agree with the type of players they feel best fits the team based on the style of play and personality profile.
If the Grizzlies do not see there are fault lines with this roster at this point and rather keep what they currently have instead of rebuilding from the ground up. Then they are complete fools as much as they think beating mediocre teams makes them the best team in the league.