If MEM ends up #1 and SEA #2...

grizzleGM · Post #1 » by **grizzleGM** » Mon May 19, 2008 2:02 pm

Would you consider trading down to the #2 in the following trade:

#1
for
#2, #24, #32, #43

Thoughts???

I think if you get the number 1 pick, the only possible trade is with the team that has the number 2 pick.

GrizzledGrizzFan · Post #2 » by **GrizzledGrizzFan** » Mon May 19, 2008 2:23 pm

I think the Grizz would have to consider that deal. That would give them 5 picks, which could be used to trade for vets and/or moving up.

Jack wore plaid · Post #3 » by **Jack wore plaid** » Mon May 19, 2008 5:13 pm

I'm assuming The Griz would pick Beasley, so why would Seattle do that?

In actuality Either Rose or Beasley works well in Seattle. They could pair Rose and Durrant together, or they could draft Beasley and have he and Durrant on both the front nad back courts.

D1SGRUNTL3D · Post #4 » by **D1SGRUNTL3D** » Mon May 19, 2008 6:50 pm

Do you trust a Green/Durant/Beasley combo more then a Durant/Rose/Green combo and no pg?

Grizz would be fools to not trade down, banking that Seattle would take Rose

grizzleGM · Post #5 » by **grizzleGM** » Mon May 19, 2008 9:13 pm

D1SGRUNTL3D wrote:Do you trust a Green/Durant/Beasley combo more then a Durant/Rose/Green combo and no pg?

Grizz would be fools to not trade down, banking that Seattle would take Rose

This was my thought process behind the trade. The Grizz need either one of the top 2 picks, but Seattle realistically only need Rose.

Post #6 » by **boogiesdad** » Mon May 19, 2008 9:35 pm

mem would be all over that deal