Do you think the Grizz will make a push for Okafor?
Posted: Fri May 23, 2008 7:20 am
The Grizzlies are under the cap. They'll have approximately 9.55 million to spend, by my calculations. If you have some more accurate calculations, please post them.
However, with that 9.5 million, and the fact that the Bobcats balked at paying Okafor a big money extension, do you think you'll pursue him? You could offer him a contract starting at 9.5, with raises of 10.5%- meaning 9.55, 10.55, 11.66, 12.89, 14.24 million a year- 59 million/5 years. The Bobcats MAY match that.
If they're willing to match that, a viable option is giving Hakim Warrick away for nothing. Just give him to the Bulls or Seattle, or a team under the cap, for a trade exception(maybe a future 2nd, as well). You'll gain 1.6 more million in capspace to offer Okafor. That deal would be 11.15, 12.32, 13.61, 15.04, 16.62m, or 69 million/5 years. The Bobcats will very likely balk at that...it would very likely indicate the luxury tax in a few years for them.
So what're your thoughts? Would you pay Oak that much? Is he worth it to you? Would management do it after the Pau fiasco?
However, with that 9.5 million, and the fact that the Bobcats balked at paying Okafor a big money extension, do you think you'll pursue him? You could offer him a contract starting at 9.5, with raises of 10.5%- meaning 9.55, 10.55, 11.66, 12.89, 14.24 million a year- 59 million/5 years. The Bobcats MAY match that.
If they're willing to match that, a viable option is giving Hakim Warrick away for nothing. Just give him to the Bulls or Seattle, or a team under the cap, for a trade exception(maybe a future 2nd, as well). You'll gain 1.6 more million in capspace to offer Okafor. That deal would be 11.15, 12.32, 13.61, 15.04, 16.62m, or 69 million/5 years. The Bobcats will very likely balk at that...it would very likely indicate the luxury tax in a few years for them.
So what're your thoughts? Would you pay Oak that much? Is he worth it to you? Would management do it after the Pau fiasco?