ImageImage

Off-season scenario #31,201

Moderators: SD2042, VCfor3

User avatar
grizzleGM
Analyst
Posts: 3,279
And1: 0
Joined: Feb 04, 2005

Off-season scenario #31,201 

Post#1 » by grizzleGM » Mon May 26, 2008 3:34 pm

1) Trade GS-MEM

MMiller
for
TPE, #49

2) Trade GS - MEM

Draft rights to Marc Gasol
for
Draft rights to Marcus Speights (#14)

3) Offer Josh Smith 5 years $13.5mil/year

4) Offer JR Smith 5 years $4mil


Players 08-09 salaries (14 roster spots)
Smith $13.5 mil
Darko $7.0 m
Collins $6.2 m
Cardinal $6.3 m
Smith $4.0 m
Mayo $4.0 m (DRAFT #5)
Conley $3.6 m
Gay $2.6 m
Warrick $2.1 m
Robin Lopez $1.8 m (DRAFT #14)
Critt $1.3 m
Lowry $1.2 m
Bill Walker $1.0 m (DRAFT #28)
Richard Hendrix $.5 m
Stoudamire ~ $2.3 m (Still counts against the cap)

Total salaries = $57.4 million (should be right about the cap # this year)

Lineup:
Conley/Mayo
Smith/Critt
Gay/Walker/
Smith/Warrick/Hendrix
Darko/Lopez/Collins


There is a some insurance in the backcourt due to the fact that Mayo and Critt can play both PG and SG (at least they think they can).
M-Town's Finest
Sophomore
Posts: 133
And1: 0
Joined: Jun 03, 2007

 

Post#2 » by M-Town's Finest » Mon May 26, 2008 4:41 pm

Problems:

1) What are the chances that Josh Smith actually hits the market, and even if he does, what are the chances that he actually chooses to play in Memphis regardless of salary? I think the second one is an easier hurdle than the first since he, I think, is still on his rookie deal meaning that he hasn't made much money to date.

2) I don't think JR Smith could be had for $4mil/year.

3) It doesn't look like Mayo will be available at the 5th pick, unfortunately. Maybe we could swing some deal to move up with Lowry as bate, though. Doubtful, I think.

4) Even if we luck up and get Mayo 5th, I think we would be better off playing him at the 2 (probably starting since I don't think we can sign JR).

5) You seem to have a contradiction in that you wanted to take Speights 14th and then you put Robin Lopez at that pick?? Either way, I think I like Gasol more than either of them from what I've read about his season overseas.
User avatar
bgassassin
Starter
Posts: 2,231
And1: 0
Joined: Jul 17, 2005
Location: Memphis, 10SC

 

Post#3 » by bgassassin » Mon May 26, 2008 5:26 pm

Nice one GM, but thanks to the FO I have given up on bothering with elaborate trade ideas. I try to keep them as simple as possible.
User avatar
grizzleGM
Analyst
Posts: 3,279
And1: 0
Joined: Feb 04, 2005

 

Post#4 » by grizzleGM » Mon May 26, 2008 6:47 pm

Yeah... I was teetering between Lopez and Speights. The issue is that they are cheaper than Gasol. Signing Gasol would put the Grizz over the cap if signing the above two free agents.

I would rather have Gasol... but it is looking like his contract will have to begin somewhere in the neighborhood of $4mil/year.
User avatar
BarbaGrizz
Analyst
Posts: 3,609
And1: 1,751
Joined: May 25, 2007
Location: Brazil
     

 

Post#5 » by BarbaGrizz » Mon May 26, 2008 7:15 pm

Forget Lopez/Speights and draft Chase Budinger* at #14
Forget JR Smith and sign Gasol for $4Mil/year.

Lineup:

PG- Conley/Lowry/Crit
SG- Mayo/Budinger/Crit
SF- Gay/Walker/Budinger
PF- Smith/Warrick/Hendrix(or Hometown-boy Joey Dorsey)
C- Gasol/Milicic/Collins

*I have 101% sure that Budinger will be a steal for anyone who take him beyond #10... NBADraft says he is a Grant Hill with 3PT Range...a player like this is a bargain at #14
User avatar
bobobolas1
Bench Warmer
Posts: 1,253
And1: 0
Joined: May 17, 2007
Location: Not Finland anymore

 

Post#6 » by bobobolas1 » Tue May 27, 2008 12:04 am

M.Gasol>>>Marcus Speights and/or (#14)

I think he is already better than Darko. I havent seen a lot of things in Darko. I mean, he is a good rebounder and can defend. But, i can see more things in marc than in him.
User avatar
BarbaGrizz
Analyst
Posts: 3,609
And1: 1,751
Joined: May 25, 2007
Location: Brazil
     

 

Post#7 » by BarbaGrizz » Tue May 27, 2008 5:53 am

and this trade?

MMiller to Phoenix for #15 + TPE (Kurt Thomas)

Crit to Sac for #42 + #43 + cash

???
Celtic Koala wrote:The only player from the 90s that would have been a top 10 player in the modern league would have been MJ and if you stretch it a bit Olajuwon

bstein14 wrote:Mikan is much worse than Luka Garza, who can't even make an NBA roster today
User avatar
grizzleGM
Analyst
Posts: 3,279
And1: 0
Joined: Feb 04, 2005

 

Post#8 » by grizzleGM » Tue May 27, 2008 2:33 pm

The talk on the radio this morning is that Mayo seems intent on playing PG in the NBA... if that is the case, I think drafting him at 5 could be bad for the team. It is one thing to draft Rose to replace Conely, Lowry, or Critt as the PG of the future, but I don't like the idea of Mayo playing PG.

If you don't draft Mayo at #5 do you take Gallinari? or trade down and try to take Love or Gallinari later?

I agree Barba, but I think Budinger will fall out of the top 10 due to teams taking a chance on Randolph, Lopez, and Jordan. He would be a great selection as a true SG.

I'm with you barba except to draft Gallinari:
PG- Conley/Lowry/Crit
SG- Budinger/Crit/Gallinari
SF- Gay/Gallinari/Walker
PF- Smith/Warrick/Hendrix(or Hometown-boy Joey Dorsey)
C- Gasol/Milicic/Collins
User avatar
BarbaGrizz
Analyst
Posts: 3,609
And1: 1,751
Joined: May 25, 2007
Location: Brazil
     

 

Post#9 » by BarbaGrizz » Tue May 27, 2008 5:31 pm

Agreed GM...Maybe Galinari is the 4th best player in the draft, but I don
Celtic Koala wrote:The only player from the 90s that would have been a top 10 player in the modern league would have been MJ and if you stretch it a bit Olajuwon

bstein14 wrote:Mikan is much worse than Luka Garza, who can't even make an NBA roster today
User avatar
grizzleGM
Analyst
Posts: 3,279
And1: 0
Joined: Feb 04, 2005

 

Post#10 » by grizzleGM » Tue May 27, 2008 7:50 pm

If I am going to draft two players in the top 7 it would be Love and Bayless if available at #5 if not then Mayo... or trade down for Budinger.
M-Town's Finest
Sophomore
Posts: 133
And1: 0
Joined: Jun 03, 2007

 

Post#11 » by M-Town's Finest » Tue May 27, 2008 10:38 pm

If Mayo isn't playing the 2, I think I'd rather keep Conley.
User avatar
Double Dribble
Junior
Posts: 426
And1: 0
Joined: May 14, 2007

 

Post#12 » by Double Dribble » Thu May 29, 2008 6:21 pm

Should have known it would be another ridiculous trade thread.

Here's a trade idea:

Memphis trades the Grizzlies to some other sucker city.
User avatar
grizzleGM
Analyst
Posts: 3,279
And1: 0
Joined: Feb 04, 2005

 

Post#13 » by grizzleGM » Thu May 29, 2008 9:31 pm

Double Dribble wrote:Should have known it would be another ridiculous trade thread.

Here's a trade idea:

Memphis trades the Grizzlies to some other sucker city.


Should have guessed... Double Dribble passing judgment without giving constructive feedback! WOW... what a shock.

Here's an idea... can we trade Double Dribble to another board?
User avatar
Double Dribble
Junior
Posts: 426
And1: 0
Joined: May 14, 2007

 

Post#14 » by Double Dribble » Thu May 29, 2008 10:24 pm

there isn't anything constructive about any of these worthless trade "scenarios".
User avatar
grizzleGM
Analyst
Posts: 3,279
And1: 0
Joined: Feb 04, 2005

 

Post#15 » by grizzleGM » Fri May 30, 2008 12:04 am

Yeah... So why do you keep coming back?
User avatar
Double Dribble
Junior
Posts: 426
And1: 0
Joined: May 14, 2007

 

Post#16 » by Double Dribble » Fri May 30, 2008 11:54 am

Had I known it was another stupid trade thread, I wouldn't have. Typical of most Grizzlies fans, though, you seem to prefer dealing with fantasy hypotheticals instead of reality.
hptmatthew
Senior
Posts: 570
And1: 3
Joined: Jan 25, 2007

 

Post#17 » by hptmatthew » Fri May 30, 2008 3:30 pm

Double Dribble wrote:there isn't anything constructive about any of these worthless trade "scenarios".


there doesn't have to be. The activity of reading/posting around here is something most of us deem "recreation" or "entertainment". Perhaps you should view it as such and you wouldn't be so inclined to spew venom.

Then again, maybe doing what you do on these boards (well, this board anyway) is entertainment from your perspective.
M-Town's Finest
Sophomore
Posts: 133
And1: 0
Joined: Jun 03, 2007

 

Post#18 » by M-Town's Finest » Fri May 30, 2008 10:14 pm

Double Dribble wrote:Had I known it was another stupid trade thread, I wouldn't have. Typical of most Grizzlies fans, though, you seem to prefer dealing with fantasy hypotheticals instead of reality.


Because the title was so very misleading.
User avatar
Double Dribble
Junior
Posts: 426
And1: 0
Joined: May 14, 2007

 

Post#19 » by Double Dribble » Fri May 30, 2008 11:51 pm

M-Town's Finest wrote:-= original quote snipped =-
Because the title was so very misleading.
No, it was vague.
jefe
General Manager
Posts: 8,304
And1: 744
Joined: Apr 27, 2005
Location: memphis

 

Post#20 » by jefe » Mon Jun 2, 2008 4:37 am

Double Dribble wrote:Should have known it would be another ridiculous trade thread.

Here's a trade idea:

Memphis trades the Grizzlies to some other sucker city.


Aw, still don't have anything else to do with yourself these days besides this?

Are you a Grizz hater, a self-loathing Memphian, or both?

Return to Memphis Grizzlies