Page 1 of 1
Arthur
Posted: Mon Jan 5, 2009 1:36 pm
by cedric76
guys ,i need help
if u r out of the play off race ,will arthur get more PT? what kind of stats do u see him averaging in march-april
thx
Re: Arthur
Posted: Mon Jan 5, 2009 2:00 pm
by GrizzledGrizzFan
Arthur will apparently continue to get consistently inconsistent PT. Start some game, barely play in others. Only the Shadow knows the way of the Ivy...
Re: Arthur
Posted: Mon Jan 5, 2009 4:41 pm
by cedric76
though memphis wanted to build around him
Re: Arthur
Posted: Mon Jan 5, 2009 4:45 pm
by GrizzledGrizzFan
Arthur is a rookie. He's a rookie who will be a future contributor. The Grizz are building around Mayo/Gay/Gasol - Arthur appears to be a piece of the puzzle, but not a key component at this time.
Re: Arthur
Posted: Tue Jan 6, 2009 9:28 am
by cedric76
so why not give him as much pt in the next few months?
Re: Arthur
Posted: Tue Jan 6, 2009 5:49 pm
by GrizzledGrizzFan
He had a minor injury that took away some PT. Hak has played a little better which took some PT. Darko being out will add to his PT. Depending on match ups, he should continue to get at least 20 min a night from here on out.
Re: Arthur
Posted: Tue Jan 6, 2009 8:00 pm
by It_Was_Typed
I would think so, he has all the tools to be a good power forward in the league.
He's a very good athlete with solid offensive skills and has shown he can rebound well. Once he adds some muscle and learns how to play defense without fouling, he'll be the goods.
Right now, he's in a Udonis Haslem-like role of hitting his mid-range jump shots and rebounding but in due time I think he can be like a slightly less athletic Antonio McDyess.
Re: Arthur
Posted: Fri Jan 9, 2009 9:20 pm
by cedric76
what will be the minutes distribution once darko si back?
will arthur still egt 20 min+?
thx
Re: Arthur
Posted: Sat Jan 10, 2009 5:40 pm
by It_Was_Typed
I think somewhere in the vicinity of 15-20 minutes is reasonable.
Re: Arthur
Posted: Mon Jan 12, 2009 3:50 am
by GoGrizz
I must say....that I have not seen too much from Arthur to think it was a good signing for us......
Re: Arthur
Posted: Mon Jan 12, 2009 2:00 pm
by jefe
GoGrizz wrote:I must say....that I have not seen too much from Arthur to think it was a good signing for us......
He was a late first round pick, widely considered to be a lottery pick until until later-proven-false health concerns caused him to drop. He wasn't a free agent signing.
Re: Arthur
Posted: Mon Jan 12, 2009 2:47 pm
by GrizzledGrizzFan
jefe wrote:GoGrizz wrote:I must say....that I have not seen too much from Arthur to think it was a good signing for us......
He was a late first round pick, widely considered to be a lottery pick until until later-proven-false health concerns caused him to drop. He wasn't a free agent signing.
If you're going to get technical jefe, go all the way, we didn't even draft him - we traded for him

Re: Arthur
Posted: Tue Jan 13, 2009 12:10 am
by cedric76
do u mind doing the minutes break down for ur PF and C?
thx
Re: Arthur
Posted: Tue Jan 13, 2009 7:10 pm
by It_Was_Typed
cedric76 wrote:do u mind doing the minutes break down for ur PF and C?
thx
Before Darko went down with his injury, it was working out like this:
Darko - 24-30 MPG
Marc - 28-32 MPG
Hak - 20-25 MPG
Darell - 15 MPG
Re: Arthur
Posted: Wed Jan 14, 2009 5:50 pm
by cedric76
thx