The Grizz and the Mystery of Lester Hudson
Posted: Fri Jan 29, 2010 3:57 am
I have been thinking, why would the Grizzlies claim an unproven product like Lester Hudson off of waivers.
1) They did so knowing that his contract would become guaranteed.
2) He has proven to be an effective player in the league, despite having some talent.
3) He doesn't play a position of need or provide any real depth that this team could use.
I mean I suppose he could serve as 3rd string PG/SG in the event that we move Marcus Williams but I don't think they claim him unless they are committed to either waiving or trading Williams, which I do expect to happen at some point.
But there are other more experienced players aside from Hudson they could have used to fill that spot. Yes his minimum salary is good, but I also think that this has some to do with Boston as well.
I know they really tried hard to trade Hudson to save money but couldn't find a team as a taker and were forced to waive him. I wonder if this was something the Grizzlies or Chris Wallace did as a favor to the Celtics (things like that does happen). And if so, could there be a reaping of the favor for Memphis this season, in the form of a player that could help us.
Like an Eddie House (my preference) or a Tony Allen?
I wouldn't rule it out.
1) They did so knowing that his contract would become guaranteed.
2) He has proven to be an effective player in the league, despite having some talent.
3) He doesn't play a position of need or provide any real depth that this team could use.
I mean I suppose he could serve as 3rd string PG/SG in the event that we move Marcus Williams but I don't think they claim him unless they are committed to either waiving or trading Williams, which I do expect to happen at some point.
But there are other more experienced players aside from Hudson they could have used to fill that spot. Yes his minimum salary is good, but I also think that this has some to do with Boston as well.
I know they really tried hard to trade Hudson to save money but couldn't find a team as a taker and were forced to waive him. I wonder if this was something the Grizzlies or Chris Wallace did as a favor to the Celtics (things like that does happen). And if so, could there be a reaping of the favor for Memphis this season, in the form of a player that could help us.
Like an Eddie House (my preference) or a Tony Allen?
I wouldn't rule it out.