Common Theme Pairs Draft 2.0 - R2 - Laimbeer* vs Dr Positivity

Moderators: Snakebites, MadNESS, Fadeaway_J

Which team wins?

Poll ended at Sun Mar 16, 2025 3:07 am

Laimbeer
5
50%
Dr Positivity
5
50%
 
Total votes: 10

durantbird
General Manager
Posts: 8,318
And1: 1,732
Joined: Nov 30, 2019

Common Theme Pairs Draft 2.0 - R2 - Laimbeer* vs Dr Positivity 

Post#1 » by durantbird » Fri Mar 14, 2025 5:53 pm

Here is a quick list of what you need in your writeup.

1. Specific years for each player on your team
2. Rotations and minutes for each player
3. Reasoning as to why your team will win and/or why people should vote for you.

Do not vote in this thread until both managers have submitted their writeups. Once the writeups are posted, I will add a poll, and the team with the most votes after 24 hours will advance. EACH MANAGER SHOULD ALSO VOTE FOR THEIR OWN TEAM IN THE POLL - IF YOU FAIL TO DO THIS, YOU ARE SIMPLY GIVING AWAY A VOTE. If the votes are tied, we will decide the matchup via AI vote.

You are not required to state or explain your vote, but you are free to comment in the thread if you want to.

If writeups aren't posted within 24 hours, we will vote solely based on the players they have drafted (and any rotations they have posted on their roster page).

Laimbeer wrote:

Dr Positivity wrote:
User avatar
Dr Positivity
RealGM
Posts: 62,382
And1: 16,276
Joined: Apr 29, 2009
       

Re: Common Theme Pairs Draft 2.0 - R2 - Laimbeer vs Dr Positivity 

Post#2 » by Dr Positivity » Fri Mar 14, 2025 6:42 pm

PG: Chris Paul (2015: 14.3 FGA)
SG: Michael Cooper (1986: 7.4 FGA)
SF: Jalen Williams (2024: 14.0 FGA)
PF: Karl Malone (1998: 18.2 FGA)
C: Pau Gasol (2009: 12.9 FGA)

PG/SG: James Harden (10.1 FGA)
SF: Joe Ingles (2017: 5.5 FGA)
PF: Robert Covington (2023: 4.8 FGA)

87.2 / 88

PG: Chris Paul (38) / James Harden (10)
SG: Michael Cooper (26) / James Harden (22)
SF: Jalen Williams (24) / Joe Ingles (20) / Michael Cooper (4)
PF: Karl Malone (28) / Jalen Williams (10) / Robert Covington (10)
C: Pau Gasol (38) / Karl Malone (10)

GL Laimbeer

Defensive matchups: Paul on Moncrief, Cooper on Allen, Wililams on Pippen, Malone on Schrempf, Pau on Davis

- He has some downgrades like 2024 Davis, 1998 Rodman, and 1997 Barry is a 32% 3pt, league average player. When added to how Udoh is about as weak a C as we draft, his bench is certainly worse.

- With two playmaking guards in Paul/Harden and bigs in Malone/Pau, the chemistry between them should be pretty good, with the latter being able to finish off them or be used in playmaking role.

- We have solid D against his perimeter which has two average shooting wings in Moncrief and Pippen.
Liberate The Zoomers
User avatar
Laimbeer
RealGM
Posts: 42,796
And1: 15,023
Joined: Aug 12, 2009
Location: Cabin Creek
     

Re: Common Theme Pairs Draft 2.0 - R2 - Laimbeer vs Dr Positivity 

Post#3 » by Laimbeer » Sat Mar 15, 2025 2:16 am

Anthony Davis ( 2024 ) 16.9
Dennis Rodman ( 1998 ) 4.5
Detlef Schrempf ( 1995 ) 12.2
Scottie Pippen ( 1996 ) 15.8
Ray Allen ( 2001 ) 16.0
Sidney Moncrief ( 1986 ) 13.2

Ekpe Udoh ( 2018 ) 3
Detlef Schrempf ( 1995 ) 12.2
Brent Barry ( 1997 ) 6.4

88.0

Anthony Davis (38) / Ekpe Udoh (8) / Dennis Rodman (2)
Dennis Rodman (30) / Detlef Schrempf (12)
Scottie Pippen (30) / Detlef Schrempf (18)
Ray Allen (38) / Brent Barry (10)
Sidney Moncrief (38) / Scottie Pippen (10)

Good luck Dr P.

Davis, Pippen, Moncrief and Allen give us really high level offense at four positions while Rodman contributes a fistful of offensive rebounds. Gasol as the anchor of their defense is sub-standard and AD should have a big series.

Our defense is absolutely elite at four positions and they'll struggle mightily to score. AD/Gasol, Rodman/Malone, Pippen/Williams, Allen/Cooper, and Moncrief/Paul will be stifling. Williams is the only reliable volume three point shooter for Paul to set up.

Detlef coming off the bench makes us at least a wash there.

Better defense and more favorable match-ups win this for us.
Comments to rationalize bad contracts -
1) It's less than the MLE
2) He can be traded later
3) It's only __% of the cap
4) The cap is going up
5) It's only __ years
6) He's a good mentor/locker room guy
durantbird
General Manager
Posts: 8,318
And1: 1,732
Joined: Nov 30, 2019

Re: Common Theme Pairs Draft 2.0 - R2 - Laimbeer vs Dr Positivity 

Post#4 » by durantbird » Sat Mar 15, 2025 3:08 am

migya wrote:

Larry_Russell wrote:

Fadeaway_J wrote:

wackbone wrote:

ReggiesKnicks wrote:

parsnips33 wrote:

MadNess wrote:

Snakebites wrote:

durantbird wrote:

GeorgeMarcus wrote:

Laimbeer wrote:

Dr Positivity wrote:


Voting is open. Laimbeer and Dr, please vote for yourselves
durantbird
General Manager
Posts: 8,318
And1: 1,732
Joined: Nov 30, 2019

Re: Common Theme Pairs Draft 2.0 - R2 - Laimbeer vs Dr Positivity 

Post#5 » by durantbird » Sun Mar 16, 2025 6:25 am

ChatGPT vote Laimbeer - Laimbeer advances

Spoiler:
This is a close matchup between two well-balanced teams with strong defensive structures, playmaking, and offensive weapons. Let's break it down by key factors.

Offensive Matchups

Dr Positivity's Team:

Chris Paul and James Harden provide elite playmaking, while Karl Malone and Pau Gasol can operate effectively in the mid-post and high post.

Jalen Williams is a solid secondary scorer, but he's their only true high-volume three-point shooter.

Michael Cooper adds defensive value and some three-point shooting, but he's not a high-usage offensive option.

Bench offense is fairly limited, with Ingles and Covington being low-usage shooters.


Laimbeer's Team:

Anthony Davis is a dominant inside presence and should have a strong series against Gasol.

Ray Allen provides elite perimeter scoring, and Sidney Moncrief is an efficient, slashing guard.

Scottie Pippen and Detlef Schrempf add secondary scoring and playmaking.

Dennis Rodman doesn't add scoring but can create extra possessions through rebounding.

Bench offense isn't great, but Brent Barry and Schrempf add spacing and IQ.



Defensive Matchups

Dr Positivity's Team:

Chris Paul on Moncrief (good matchup for Paul, as Moncrief isn’t a high-volume scorer).

Michael Cooper on Ray Allen (elite perimeter defender against an elite shooter).

Jalen Williams on Scottie Pippen (Pippen has a size/defensive advantage).

Karl Malone on Detlef Schrempf (fairly even matchup, but Malone isn't a great perimeter defender).

Pau Gasol on Anthony Davis (AD has a clear athletic and defensive edge).


Laimbeer's Team:

Moncrief on Chris Paul (elite defender against an elite playmaker).

Ray Allen on Cooper (not a great defensive matchup, but Cooper isn’t a high-volume threat).

Pippen on Williams (Pippen should neutralize Williams).

Rodman on Malone (Rodman can limit Malone’s scoring efficiency).

Davis on Gasol (AD is the better two-way big).



Key Advantages

Laimbeer’s Team:

Better overall defense. AD, Pippen, Moncrief, and Rodman form an elite defensive core that can neutralize Dr P’s primary offensive options.

More offensive versatility. Pippen, Allen, Schrempf, and AD can create offense in multiple ways.

Rebounding edge. Rodman and AD are dominant on the boards, while Gasol and Malone are good but not elite rebounders.


Dr Positivity’s Team:

Stronger half-court offense. Paul, Harden, Malone, and Gasol fit well together, and their pick-and-roll options are elite.

More stable playmaking. Paul and Harden give them two elite offensive initiators, whereas Laimbeer's team relies on Pippen for secondary playmaking.

Perimeter defense on Ray Allen. Cooper is a great defender to slow down Allen’s scoring.



Final Verdict:

Laimbeer’s team has the defensive versatility to neutralize Paul, Harden, and Malone while winning the rebounding battle and creating enough offense through Allen, Pippen, and AD. Dr Positivity’s team would have strong stretches where they control the pace through Paul’s playmaking, but Laimbeer’s defense would hold up over a seven-game series.

Prediction: Laimbeer wins in 6 or 7 games.
His combination of elite defense, rebounding, and offensive versatility gives him the slight edge.

Return to Trades and Transactions Games