Laimbeer wrote:durantbird wrote:Snakebites wrote:I was pretty eager to give him the benefit of the doubt when he picked Wilt. It's a lot harder to do that now.
And yes, this move does affect my draft board. I'll acknowledge that now to get ahead of any bias allegations.
And it's the second time in recent drafts I've been impacted by someone picking a player specifically to mess up the board (and to their teams' own detriment).
If it's going to become a larger trend these games might not be for me anymore TBH.
Yeah it doesn't contribute in any way
Did you assume Wilt and Ewing wouldn't be taken even if I hadn't? Were you targeting them? Snakebites, Fade and Jon all still needed centers. And Fade is the only one who took one. I'm not sure what the assumptions were. FWIW, Reed is a pretty good get for not having to use category one or two. And there were other centers very comparable to Ewing still available.
Wilt and Walton I couldn't take because they were on Ray's spot. Moses as well because I already had Houston and Philly occupied. Ewing was my prime target but I had a bunch of other backup plans, Reed was one of them, also at least two other great centers, plus others who are defensive anchors along with two elite PFs who are still available.
So taking Ewing didn't made me lose all my options, but he was still my favorite choice.
I wouldn't even care if he ended up with someone who needed him like Jon, I was only annoyed/upset because his pick seemed to make absolutely zero sense unless you were trying to mess others' plans.
Like Dr P said, I think taking Wilt is justifiable especially with his low cost. Garnett can play SF, Embiid is ok at PF. I wasn't upset at that. Taking Ewing when you already have three other bigs doesn't seem justifiable at all though if your goal is to maximize your own team.