Snakebites wrote:Okay.
It's wack's turn
Moderators: Snakebites, MadNESS, Fadeaway_J
Snakebites wrote:Okay.


Dr Positivity wrote:Oh thank god undrafted guys count, the 3 and D pool was looking bleak without them.
Snakebites wrote:Jeez the pool of role players has thinned out.

wackbone wrote:Snakebites wrote:Jeez the pool of role players has thinned out.
Hey, I’ll be able to make my own 8th round pick after all. Undecided about the two names I sent you. Thanks for your help!

wackbone wrote:In.
GeorgeMarcus wrote:Ok I'll join
Snakebites wrote:wackbone wrote:Snakebites wrote:Jeez the pool of role players has thinned out.
Hey, I’ll be able to make my own 8th round pick after all. Undecided about the two names I sent you. Thanks for your help!
There was another point guard I was surprised to see you weren't considering.
I more or less managed to build exactly the team I thought I'd be able to build when I drafted AD in round 1- I think I got all of the pieces I needed.
Not sure it'll be enough here. Lots of good teams.

flaco wrote:Was ready to take Bam in round 4. Opinions on a potential Bam-Jokic fit? Don't think I've seen them drafted together in our games.
I'd argue it's a perfect fit on defense, but reduces Bam to a cutter/screener on offense. Can't take advantage of his passing and ball handling alongside Jokic. I think Timelord offers that exact same package for 6.0 FGA instead of 11.0. Would have still taken Bam though for the star power.
Larry_Russell wrote:yup

wackbone wrote:Snakebites wrote:wackbone wrote:Hey, I’ll be able to make my own 8th round pick after all. Undecided about the two names I sent you. Thanks for your help!
There was another point guard I was surprised to see you weren't considering.
I more or less managed to build exactly the team I thought I'd be able to build when I drafted AD in round 1- I think I got all of the pieces I needed.
Not sure it'll be enough here. Lots of good teams.
Who? I went through all my available drafts and can't find who you are referring to. No one left is going to take a high volume PG so it's safe to namedrop.

JimmyPlopper wrote:flaco wrote:Was ready to take Bam in round 4. Opinions on a potential Bam-Jokic fit? Don't think I've seen them drafted together in our games.
I'd argue it's a perfect fit on defense, but reduces Bam to a cutter/screener on offense. Can't take advantage of his passing and ball handling alongside Jokic. I think Timelord offers that exact same package for 6.0 FGA instead of 11.0. Would have still taken Bam though for the star power.
Agreed it's great in defense. On offense I consider Bam a lot stronger with the ball in his hands which is also the case for Joker. Feels like a bit too much overlap on offense to justify the Bam pick but thats just my own view
Snakebites wrote:wackbone wrote:Snakebites wrote:There was another point guard I was surprised to see you weren't considering.
I more or less managed to build exactly the team I thought I'd be able to build when I drafted AD in round 1- I think I got all of the pieces I needed.
Not sure it'll be enough here. Lots of good teams.
Who? I went through all my available drafts and can't find who you are referring to. No one left is going to take a high volume PG so it's safe to namedrop.
Embiids real life teammate.
Return to Trades and Transactions Games