wackbone wrote:Dr Positivity wrote:Dr Positivity wrote:
Or a draft where everyone has to draft 1 player from each of Lakers, Celtics, Spurs, Warriors, Sixers, Pistons, Suns, Blazers - or whatever 8 teams is determined to have the best pool. We could also have 9 teams but you are allowed to pass on one, which would give people a little more flexibility
I'm thinking about starting this as the next game unless Laimbeer wants to do the stair step. Any disagreement on which 8 teams should be picked? (maybe Rockets instead of Blazer or Suns) If there has to be 16 players from each franchise taken, I figure having the eight most stacked franchises helps
Depending on the years we would be using, I would rather use the Heat and/or Rockets over the Blazers for sure, and possibly also the Suns. Lakers, Celtics, Spurs, Warriors, Sixers, and Pistons should all be definitely in, with the Rockets as my next team up, and the Heat/Suns/Bulls/Jazz in contention for the final spot(s). Again, it heavily depends on the time period being used. I for one have become exhausted from the high amounts of 90s to present games recently, but we are collectively much more comfortable drafting people we have watched. Post-Merger would certainly increase the talent pool, especially for a team like the Sixers who would otherwise be pretty shallow. If we do Post-Merger than the Blazers would also be in contention.
This is why I wanted to know the time frame, because you'd have to go post-merger or 80s to now to justify including the Sixers.
That's just me though.
