JimmyPlopper wrote:.
Up
Moderators: Snakebites, MadNESS, Fadeaway_J
JimmyPlopper wrote:.
Jon_3232 wrote:.
Fadeaway_J wrote:Oops, I quoted Jimmy instead of Jon by mistake.Jon_3232 wrote:.
Doubt it will matter as he hasn't been online since last November...
JimmyPlopper wrote:Fadeaway_J wrote:Oops, I quoted Jimmy instead of Jon by mistake.Jon_3232 wrote:.
Doubt it will matter as he hasn't been online since last November...
I think Jon was quoted before you quoted me. But I will allow Jon to take Cam Johnson if he does want him and I will repick.
flaco wrote:.
wackbone wrote:Was between Powell and Pritchard for my pick. Love seeing him get taken.
Fadeaway_J wrote:Will leave the waiver period open until midnight in case Jon shows up by some miracle.
MadNESS wrote:Fadeaway_J wrote:Will leave the waiver period open until midnight in case Jon shows up by some miracle.
We doing one more waiver period?
Fadeaway_J wrote:Picks
R1: Anthony Davis
R2: Devin Booker
R3: Jaylen Brown
R4: Jalen Suggs
R5: Jaden McDaniels
R6: James Harden
R7: Draymond Green
R8: Brook Lopez
R9: Jalen Johnson
R10: Zach LaVine
Waiver: Ivica Zubac
wackbone wrote:If I had a healthy Kawhi, Ingram, and Lively I like my team:
Jalen Brunson (32) / Norman Powell (16)
Desmond Bane (32) / Jalen Green (16)
Kawhi Leonard (32) / OG Anunoby (16)
Pascal Siakam (32) / Brandon Ingram (16)
Nikola Jokic (38) / Dereck Lively II (10)
Without those three, things get a bit dicey:
Jalen Brunson (36) / Norman Powell (12)
Desmond Bane (36) / Norman Powell (12)
Jalen Green (28) / OG Anunoby (14) / Norman Powell (6)
Pascal Siakam (26) / OG Anunoby (22)
Nikola Jokic (38) / Pascal Siakam (10)
Still a solid team with Jokic, likely All-NBA Brunson, fringe All-NBA Powell, Green, and Siakam, and solid contributors Bane and Anunoby. But having Kawhi specifically would really put the whole team over the top.
Fade, how do we evaluate injuries for this exercise again? If they played fewer than 41 games we can't include them?
Fadeaway_J wrote:durantbird wrote:In a regular draft we don't really factor in injuries, it's merely a question of whether the player is eligible or not.
How do we evaluate them here? Suppose I pick Kawhi and I didn't drop him but he ended up playing only 20 games. How is he judged?
Again, I don't want to impose a games minimum as there's no way to predict beforehand that enough of your players will meet it. This is why we're doing rankings based on season performance as opposed to playoffs.
You will have to use your judgement to determine how much you penalise for missed games. Think of it somewhat like awards voting (prior to the games minimums being implemented). 20 games is obviously too extreme, but you may decide 55 games of one player is more valuable than 70 games of another.
Fadeaway_J wrote:wackbone wrote:If I had a healthy Kawhi, Ingram, and Lively I like my team:
Jalen Brunson (32) / Norman Powell (16)
Desmond Bane (32) / Jalen Green (16)
Kawhi Leonard (32) / OG Anunoby (16)
Pascal Siakam (32) / Brandon Ingram (16)
Nikola Jokic (38) / Dereck Lively II (10)
Without those three, things get a bit dicey:
Jalen Brunson (36) / Norman Powell (12)
Desmond Bane (36) / Norman Powell (12)
Jalen Green (28) / OG Anunoby (14) / Norman Powell (6)
Pascal Siakam (26) / OG Anunoby (22)
Nikola Jokic (38) / Pascal Siakam (10)
Still a solid team with Jokic, likely All-NBA Brunson, fringe All-NBA Powell, Green, and Siakam, and solid contributors Bane and Anunoby. But having Kawhi specifically would really put the whole team over the top.
Fade, how do we evaluate injuries for this exercise again? If they played fewer than 41 games we can't include them?
Here's my response from earlier in the thread:Fadeaway_J wrote:durantbird wrote:In a regular draft we don't really factor in injuries, it's merely a question of whether the player is eligible or not.
How do we evaluate them here? Suppose I pick Kawhi and I didn't drop him but he ended up playing only 20 games. How is he judged?
Again, I don't want to impose a games minimum as there's no way to predict beforehand that enough of your players will meet it. This is why we're doing rankings based on season performance as opposed to playoffs.
You will have to use your judgement to determine how much you penalise for missed games. Think of it somewhat like awards voting (prior to the games minimums being implemented). 20 games is obviously too extreme, but you may decide 55 games of one player is more valuable than 70 games of another.
wackbone wrote:Fadeaway_J wrote:wackbone wrote:If I had a healthy Kawhi, Ingram, and Lively I like my team:
Jalen Brunson (32) / Norman Powell (16)
Desmond Bane (32) / Jalen Green (16)
Kawhi Leonard (32) / OG Anunoby (16)
Pascal Siakam (32) / Brandon Ingram (16)
Nikola Jokic (38) / Dereck Lively II (10)
Without those three, things get a bit dicey:
Jalen Brunson (36) / Norman Powell (12)
Desmond Bane (36) / Norman Powell (12)
Jalen Green (28) / OG Anunoby (14) / Norman Powell (6)
Pascal Siakam (26) / OG Anunoby (22)
Nikola Jokic (38) / Pascal Siakam (10)
Still a solid team with Jokic, likely All-NBA Brunson, fringe All-NBA Powell, Green, and Siakam, and solid contributors Bane and Anunoby. But having Kawhi specifically would really put the whole team over the top.
Fade, how do we evaluate injuries for this exercise again? If they played fewer than 41 games we can't include them?
Here's my response from earlier in the thread:Fadeaway_J wrote:Again, I don't want to impose a games minimum as there's no way to predict beforehand that enough of your players will meet it. This is why we're doing rankings based on season performance as opposed to playoffs.
You will have to use your judgement to determine how much you penalise for missed games. Think of it somewhat like awards voting (prior to the games minimums being implemented). 20 games is obviously too extreme, but you may decide 55 games of one player is more valuable than 70 games of another.
Oy vey okay, thanks. No idea how to handle that lol
Return to Trades and Transactions Games