The Unpopular Stars draft - Discussion thread
Moderators: Snakebites, MadNESS, Fadeaway_J
Re: The Unpopular Stars draft - Discussion thread
-
parsnips33
- General Manager
- Posts: 7,536
- And1: 3,467
- Joined: Sep 01, 2014
-
Re: The Unpopular Stars draft - Discussion thread
The Manu and Pierce picks by Wack were very shrewd. Liked them at the time, like them even more now
Re: The Unpopular Stars draft - Discussion thread
-
Fadeaway_J
- Forum Mod

- Posts: 28,625
- And1: 7,675
- Joined: Jul 25, 2016
- Location: Kingston, Jamaica
-
Re: The Unpopular Stars draft - Discussion thread
Laimbeer wrote:DRob/Timmy, Mike/Pippen... this was inevitable in this game I suppose
Up
Re: The Unpopular Stars draft - Discussion thread
- Laimbeer
- RealGM
- Posts: 43,098
- And1: 15,164
- Joined: Aug 12, 2009
- Location: Cabin Creek
-
Re: The Unpopular Stars draft - Discussion thread
Starting to wonder if some big names will go undrafted.
Comments to rationalize bad contracts -
1) It's less than the MLE
2) He can be traded later
3) It's only __% of the cap
4) The cap is going up
5) It's only __ years
6) He's a good mentor/locker room guy
1) It's less than the MLE
2) He can be traded later
3) It's only __% of the cap
4) The cap is going up
5) It's only __ years
6) He's a good mentor/locker room guy
Re: The Unpopular Stars draft - Discussion thread
-
wackbone
- RealGM
- Posts: 12,041
- And1: 3,707
- Joined: Jan 05, 2017
Re: The Unpopular Stars draft - Discussion thread
Snakebites wrote:You're right, got my wires crossed since I remember Fade picking right before me in round 1.
But that was a whole other thing.
Up
Re: The Unpopular Stars draft - Discussion thread
-
wackbone
- RealGM
- Posts: 12,041
- And1: 3,707
- Joined: Jan 05, 2017
Re: The Unpopular Stars draft - Discussion thread
I had Stockton+Kawhi+Certain PF MVP in mind when initially making my plans, and I think Snake might just do it here himself. Undeniable offensive cohesion
Re: The Unpopular Stars draft - Discussion thread
-
Fadeaway_J
- Forum Mod

- Posts: 28,625
- And1: 7,675
- Joined: Jul 25, 2016
- Location: Kingston, Jamaica
-
Re: The Unpopular Stars draft - Discussion thread
I'm coming to terms with the fact that I'm just going to have to start Big Al.
Re: The Unpopular Stars draft - Discussion thread
- Snakebites
- Forum Mod - Pistons

- Posts: 51,432
- And1: 18,307
- Joined: Jul 14, 2002
- Location: Looking not-so-happily deranged
-
Re: The Unpopular Stars draft - Discussion thread
Stockton Malone Kawhi is painfully unoriginal. But it works damn well.
Re: The Unpopular Stars draft - Discussion thread
-
parsnips33
- General Manager
- Posts: 7,536
- And1: 3,467
- Joined: Sep 01, 2014
-
Re: The Unpopular Stars draft - Discussion thread
Should we have done a smaller pool in hindsight? 90s to now with just 9 drafters is a little nuts
Re: The Unpopular Stars draft - Discussion thread
- Snakebites
- Forum Mod - Pistons

- Posts: 51,432
- And1: 18,307
- Joined: Jul 14, 2002
- Location: Looking not-so-happily deranged
-
Re: The Unpopular Stars draft - Discussion thread
I would have preferred a smaller draft pool for this game. Even with everyone taking on a black hole these teams still look stacked.
Re: The Unpopular Stars draft - Discussion thread
-
parsnips33
- General Manager
- Posts: 7,536
- And1: 3,467
- Joined: Sep 01, 2014
-
Re: The Unpopular Stars draft - Discussion thread
Snakebites wrote:I would have preferred a smaller draft pool for this game. Even with everyone taking on a black hole these teams still look stacked.
Great minds!
Re: The Unpopular Stars draft - Discussion thread
-
MadNESS
- Forum Mod

- Posts: 21,497
- And1: 4,063
- Joined: Jun 29, 2008
- Location: Wisco
- Contact:
-
Re: The Unpopular Stars draft - Discussion thread
Fadeaway_J wrote:MadNESS wrote:Don’t think i pick now it should haven’t started at the back again?
My bad.
Fade up for 2
LAKESHOW
Re: The Unpopular Stars draft - Discussion thread
- Snakebites
- Forum Mod - Pistons

- Posts: 51,432
- And1: 18,307
- Joined: Jul 14, 2002
- Location: Looking not-so-happily deranged
-
Re: The Unpopular Stars draft - Discussion thread
parsnips33 wrote:Snakebites wrote:I would have preferred a smaller draft pool for this game. Even with everyone taking on a black hole these teams still look stacked.
Great minds!
Hah.
By the way, Wack’s team looking solid with Hakeem in round 4.
Baron Davis was the wrong choice. Should have given him 1994 Nique.
But then, it did help me land Stockton in round 2 by taking point guard off his board. Which was part of the motivation too.
Re: The Unpopular Stars draft - Discussion thread
- Dr Positivity
- RealGM
- Posts: 62,946
- And1: 16,433
- Joined: Apr 29, 2009
-
Re: The Unpopular Stars draft - Discussion thread
parsnips33 wrote:Should we have done a smaller pool in hindsight? 90s to now with just 9 drafters is a little nuts
We needed a few more unpopular stars in my opinion. The strategy of building a stacked team around a high FGA player has been a little bit interesting.
Liberate The Zoomers
Re: The Unpopular Stars draft - Discussion thread
-
Fadeaway_J
- Forum Mod

- Posts: 28,625
- And1: 7,675
- Joined: Jul 25, 2016
- Location: Kingston, Jamaica
-
Re: The Unpopular Stars draft - Discussion thread
Man parsnips got me good with the Big Al pick. 
Re: The Unpopular Stars draft - Discussion thread
-
Colbinii
- RealGM
- Posts: 34,243
- And1: 21,859
- Joined: Feb 13, 2013
Re: The Unpopular Stars draft - Discussion thread
Dr Positivity wrote:parsnips33 wrote:Should we have done a smaller pool in hindsight? 90s to now with just 9 drafters is a little nuts
We needed a few more unpopular stars in my opinion. The strategy of building a stacked team around a high FGA player has been a little bit interesting.
We should have done 90s to now for the pool of scrubs but the actual draft be 00s to now.
Hindsight is 20-20
Re: The Unpopular Stars draft - Discussion thread
-
parsnips33
- General Manager
- Posts: 7,536
- And1: 3,467
- Joined: Sep 01, 2014
-
Re: The Unpopular Stars draft - Discussion thread
Dr Positivity wrote:parsnips33 wrote:Should we have done a smaller pool in hindsight? 90s to now with just 9 drafters is a little nuts
We needed a few more unpopular stars in my opinion. The strategy of building a stacked team around a high FGA player has been a little bit interesting.
Definitely think the general conceit is a keeper, just thinking about tweaks for next time we run something like this
Re: The Unpopular Stars draft - Discussion thread
-
parsnips33
- General Manager
- Posts: 7,536
- And1: 3,467
- Joined: Sep 01, 2014
-
Re: The Unpopular Stars draft - Discussion thread
Fade with his own personal "all players had to have been teammates" challenge 
Re: The Unpopular Stars draft - Discussion thread
-
MadNESS
- Forum Mod

- Posts: 21,497
- And1: 4,063
- Joined: Jun 29, 2008
- Location: Wisco
- Contact:
-
Re: The Unpopular Stars draft - Discussion thread
lilroddyb wrote:I think some of you are overrating Cousins lol
One man's trash is another man's treasure I guess![]()
I'm going to sleep soon, can I send my list to someone?
Up
LAKESHOW
Re: The Unpopular Stars draft - Discussion thread
- Laimbeer
- RealGM
- Posts: 43,098
- And1: 15,164
- Joined: Aug 12, 2009
- Location: Cabin Creek
-
Re: The Unpopular Stars draft - Discussion thread
Fadeaway_J wrote:Man parsnips got me good with the Big Al pick.
Looks like he's headed to the bench after all? I like the Wallaces with MJ/Pippen.
GOATbrook has been tough as well. There were a number of good, cheap points in this one. And he had one of the higher fga's.
Comments to rationalize bad contracts -
1) It's less than the MLE
2) He can be traded later
3) It's only __% of the cap
4) The cap is going up
5) It's only __ years
6) He's a good mentor/locker room guy
1) It's less than the MLE
2) He can be traded later
3) It's only __% of the cap
4) The cap is going up
5) It's only __ years
6) He's a good mentor/locker room guy
Re: The Unpopular Stars draft - Discussion thread
-
Fadeaway_J
- Forum Mod

- Posts: 28,625
- And1: 7,675
- Joined: Jul 25, 2016
- Location: Kingston, Jamaica
-
Re: The Unpopular Stars draft - Discussion thread
I'd probably add a stipulation that the unpopular stars have to start and play 30+ minutes.
With that said, you might have to tweak the rules to create a baseline level of talent. One-off All-NBA Third Team guys like Big Al and Juwan Howard aren't really in the same bracket as a Westbrook or even a DeRozan.
With that said, you might have to tweak the rules to create a baseline level of talent. One-off All-NBA Third Team guys like Big Al and Juwan Howard aren't really in the same bracket as a Westbrook or even a DeRozan.
Return to Trades and Transactions Games

