flaco wrote:Count me in.
Up bud
Moderators: Snakebites, MadNESS, Fadeaway_J

JimmyPlopper wrote:I haven't played in awhile but I really like how narrow this pool is. I don't remember getting to choose among such obscure players. And for me that is the most fun part.

Larry_Russell wrote:Jokic and Westbrook.....thoughts?

ardee wrote:JimmyPlopper wrote:I haven't played in awhile but I really like how narrow this pool is. I don't remember getting to choose among such obscure players. And for me that is the most fun part.
Sent you my list one more time friend, thanks.

Snakebites wrote:This is the first pool I’ve ever seen where I’m legit concerned I’m going to end up with like 10 extra FGA…

Laimbeer wrote:.

Snakebites wrote:My bad on not quoting. I was super busy for a minute there.
I’m definitely getting the pieces I need to make this team work. So far it’s pretty much the 2011 Mavericks with Klay, but I do think that prime Klay would add a dimension to that offense it didn’t have, and that he fits with their defensive identity like a glove.

Larry_Russell wrote:Snakebites wrote:My bad on not quoting. I was super busy for a minute there.
I’m definitely getting the pieces I need to make this team work. So far it’s pretty much the 2011 Mavericks with Klay, but I do think that prime Klay would add a dimension to that offense it didn’t have, and that he fits with their defensive identity like a glove.
excluding a DPOY backbone.

MadNESS wrote:Larry_Russell wrote:Snakebites wrote:My bad on not quoting. I was super busy for a minute there.
I’m definitely getting the pieces I need to make this team work. So far it’s pretty much the 2011 Mavericks with Klay, but I do think that prime Klay would add a dimension to that offense it didn’t have, and that he fits with their defensive identity like a glove.
excluding a DPOY backbone.
you crack me up man
Larry_Russell wrote:Snakebites wrote:My bad on not quoting. I was super busy for a minute there.
I’m definitely getting the pieces I need to make this team work. So far it’s pretty much the 2011 Mavericks with Klay, but I do think that prime Klay would add a dimension to that offense it didn’t have, and that he fits with their defensive identity like a glove.
excluding a DPOY backbone.
He is a career 33% three-point shooter on low volume. He is good defensively but at his price I can understand how he's rarely drafteddurantbird wrote:Really like the Josh Howard pick. For a long time I considered him in some constellation, but usually there are better paths to spending the FGA. But he's a legit offensive option with nice spacing and superb defense
Not sure, but I think everyone else had their starting point guard by the time you chose. Still getting your stars is more important than your role players and I think you did the right thing. I passed on Bowen and Green because I was afraid you might draft Dame.MadNESS wrote:Wanted Bowen then Luka, but I was scared someone would swipe him. I knew Bowen would go. Eh, you win some, you lose some.


Snakebites wrote:I personally would prefer to start Harden over rookie Luka.
I was considering 2012 Harden as a starter before Ness took him. He was great and only didn’t start because they already had a superstar ball handler.

Laimbeer wrote:Not sure, but I think everyone else had their starting point guard by the time you chose. Still getting your stars is more important than your role players and I think you did the right thing. I passed on Bowen and Green because I was afraid you might draft Dame.MadNESS wrote:Wanted Bowen then Luka, but I was scared someone would swipe him. I knew Bowen would go. Eh, you win some, you lose some.
Sent from my Pixel 6 using RealGM mobile app
Return to Trades and Transactions Games