GM A TEAM Spring 2011 - Writeups (FINAL RANKINGS PAGE 3)

Moderators: Snakebites, MadNESS, Fadeaway_J

MJallday59
Veteran
Posts: 2,696
And1: 116
Joined: Nov 16, 2007

Re: GM A TEAM Spring 2011 - Writeups 

Post#21 » by MJallday59 » Wed May 11, 2011 8:57 pm

Image


ImageImageImageImageImage



ImageImageImageImageImage






Lamar Odom |8,900,000| 8,400,000
Jason Richardson |5,800,000|6,324,000|6,869,000
Chris Paul |$16,359,805 | $17,779,458
Andrew Bogut |11,000,000|12,000,000|13,000,000|14,000,000
Luke Walton | 5,260,000|$5,680,00|$5,800,000
Greivis Vasquez |1,035,960|1,113,600|1,191,240|2,150,184|3,203,784|
Rudy Fernandez |1,246,680|2,180,443|3,187,808|
Mike Miller |5,400,000|6,000,000|6,400,000
Francisco Garcia |4,995,000|4,605,000|4,600,000
Chris Duhon |3,500,000| 3,500,000|3,500,000|
Kenyon Martin |3,000,000| $3,000,000
Ronny Turiaf |2,000,000|2,000,000

Picks: All of them


Trading Block: Everyone

Transactions:

Zach Randolph, OJ Mayo, Tony Allen, for Gasol, Barnes, Walton

Gasol for Chris Bosh

Darell Arthur for Dorell Wright

Matt Barnes for Toney Douglas

Douglas, Henry,2012 1st for Joe Johnson Dallas 2011 2nd

Traded for Lamar Odom, Andrew Bogut and Jason Richardson




Overall: We wanted to build a winning team around a sure fire all star. The current Grizzlies have experienced incredible success so far in the playoffs...we can only imagine how good they would be with Chris Paul at the healm. We think Bogut is an upgrade over Gasol and while Odom is a step down from Zbo, the addition of CP3, Jason Richardson, Ron Artest and Lamar Odom make up and surpass the difference.
User avatar
TMACFORMVP
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 18,947
And1: 161
Joined: Jun 30, 2006
Location: 9th Seed

Re: GM A TEAM Spring 2011 - Writeups 

Post#22 » by TMACFORMVP » Wed May 11, 2011 9:22 pm

Image
2010-2011 NBA Champions

STARTING LINEUP
ImageImageImageImageImage

[PG] - Tony Parker - $12,500,000 ||| $12,500,000
[SG] - Dwyane Wade - $15,691,000 ||| $17,182,000
[SF] - Wilson Chandler - $11,000,000 ||| $12,155,000 ||| $13,310,000
[PF] - Dirk Nowitzki - $19,092,873 ||| $20,907,128
[Cc] - Chris Kaman - $12,700,000 |||

BENCH
ImageImageImageImageImage

[PG/SG] - Louis Williams - $5,176,000 |||
[SF] - Grant Hill - $3,325,416 ||| $3,674,584
[PF/C] - Amir Johnson - $5,500,000 ||| $6,000,000 ||| $6,500,000
[Cc] - Jeff Foster - $1,500,000 |||
[SF/SG] - James Jones - $854,389 |||
[PF/C] - Kurt Thomas - $854,389 |||
[PG] - Mario Chalmers - $1,200,000 |||

DEPTH CHART

PG - Parker - Chalmers
SG - Wade - Williams
SF - Chandler - Hill - Jones
PF - Nowitzki - Johnson
Cc - Kaman - Foster - Thomas

DRAFT PICKS/TPE
- 2012 GSW 2ND
- 2014 MIL 1ST
- 6.4M TPE

Goal: When I took the Nuggets, I was looking for something different than the previous games.
The Nuggets team, unlike past teams I've taken was filled with good to very good assets, but none of which were near all-star status. I would like to emphasize that point because the Nuggets had:

a.) no franchise player, nor anyone remotely close enough to someone a team would want to build around.

And considering Afflalo, Smith, Chandler, and Nene were FA's that were to be paid (though Nene wasn't paid nearly as much as he was the last game) - their value was lesser than it should have been. Felton's play had started to drop, so his value wasn't as high as it was with the Knicks (lets be honest, RealGM is all about what you've done for me the last two weeks). So in essence, while they're all solid players, they had certain flaws with their value added onto the fact none of them were elite prospects/trading assets. Anyways, to cut it short, when we took the Nuggets, we wanted to turn solid assets into a team with exceptional talent that would claim to the best team in the NBA.

Why Should the Nuggets Be Ranked High? We accomplished that goal, the Nuggets were ranked as the 2010/2011 NBA Champions. The hardest thing to do in this game is trade for legitimate superstar players (there are only very few), while maintaining a solid well rounded supporting cast. With the Nuggets, we were able to get not only one, but TWO superstars in Wade and Nowitzki (Wade being one of the top 3 players in the game, and Dirk arguably being in the Top 5). And surrounding those two, we've got an all-star caliber PG that's proven he can thrive in a third option role in Parker (a definite top 10 PG in the league, I'd place him around #7).

At SF, we were able to trade back for Chandler, who I feel is a terrific fit in the starting lineup. He's young, can defend, create off the dribble, and help space the floor. Kaman isn't the most ideal fit, but it's undeniable he isn't a liability in our lineup. He can score in the post, shoot the mid-ranger, and has always been a good rebounder despite playing next to other very good rebounders. Hell, deserved or not, the man was an all-star caliber player just last season. Off the bench, we have one of the best true 6th men in Lou Williams (14 PPG in 23 mins extrapolates out to over 21 PPG PER36). In FA, we were able to acquire Grant Hill, who'll fill in minutes from anywhere from SG to PF depending on the matchup. His defensive stats were off the charts this season, and offensively, he's been revitalized scoring near 14 PPG this season. He's smart, and knows how to play the game. Then add Amir Johnson, who's another young gun that can rebound and block shots, with an ever improving offensive game, his per minute production makes him the perfect candidate to play both big man positions off the bench (13/9 with nearly 2 blocks PER36). With those three, we feel have one of the most productive trios off the bench to go along with our potent starting lineup.

Our fill in players are no joke either as all of them are contributing rotation players to playoff teams this season. Chalmers, and Jones have had huge games for the Heat in this post-season, Foster's elite rebounding, and hustle helped the Pacers make a competitive series with the Bulls. And even Kurt Thomas is still rebounding, defending, and knocking down the mid-ranger. There are no holes with this Nuggets team, and as GM, we wanted to build a team of this mold to bring the franchise their first championship.

Two superstars, an all-star caliber third option, and depth at every position, it's unlikely to have expected to maintain the Nuggets initial depth while adding players of Wade, Nowitzki and Parker's caliber, aforementioned, two of them being top five players in the game. That ultimately should be the reason we're ranked high.

Other details: With every other hardcore win now team, there are two major problems. We tend to forget about the salary cap, and the collective ages of our team.

We've tried to do as good a job as we could to avoid these two issues while maintaining one of the best teams in the NBA. We traded away the contract of Gooden late, and were able to get pure capspace later for Mike Miller. We're now under/around 90M ( --89M--). While that's hardly anything to brag about, the situation before FA looked like if we had used any of our MLE, we'd have been near the hardcap. So, to maintain a team with depth, that can and has already contended/won a championship, we feel the added payment isn't going to waste. Not to mention, the future salaries stay around the same, in fact they drop with our few expiring contracts. No on on the team would be classified as an undesirable contract.

As for our age, the ONLY four players above 30 years old on the roster are Dirk Nowitzki (who has shown no signs of slowing down), Grant Hill, Jeff Foster, and Kurt Thomas. THAT'S IT, and every contending team needs their slew of veterans.

The average age of our core eight guys is 28.6 years old. The average age for our extended rotation is 28.9 years old. And if it counts for ANYTHING, we have some flexibility for the future with TPE's, numerous 15 1st Rounders, Milwaukee's 14 1st rounder, and a few seconds here and there. Again, nothing to brag about, but some is better than none, lol.

Could probably go on a bit more, but will wrap it up. Vote Denver!
crazybranman360
Starter
Posts: 2,060
And1: 37
Joined: Aug 12, 2009
     

Re: GM A TEAM Spring 2011 - Writeups 

Post#23 » by crazybranman360 » Thu May 12, 2011 12:28 am

CLEVELAND CAVALIERS

Before:
Ramon Sessions-Anthony Parker-Alonzo Gee-Antwan Jamison-Anderson Varejo

Baron Davis-Daniel Gibson-Christian Eyenga-Samardo Samuels-Ryan Hollins

After:
Daniel Gibson-Alec Burks-CJ Miles-Andrea Barngiani-Ersan Illyasova

Gilbert Arenas-JJ Reddick-Joey Graham-Markieff Morris-Samardo Samuels


Why I should be ranked high:
When I took over this team I had 1 goal either A) try to get an franchise guy i can build around or B) build a supporting cast for that franchise guy that i can get later. I feel like i accomplished goal B very successfully. I feel that Andrea Barngiani and Alec Burks could easily be options 2 and 3 on a championship team. They can creat there own shots and don't depend on other teamates. They are also young and will be around for a long time. The supporting players around them are all good shooters and good defensive players. In 2012 i should get a top 5 pick and with a little bit of luck i should be able to get a guy that i can build a great team around.
Image
GameChannel
Bench Warmer
Posts: 1,499
And1: 1,328
Joined: Apr 17, 2010

Re: GM A TEAM Spring 2011 - Writeups 

Post#24 » by GameChannel » Thu May 12, 2011 3:57 am

hey guys, I will post my roster in the morning. PC isnt working, will have to do it from work. Sorry abt the delay.
User avatar
BIRDMAN BIRDMAN
Head Coach
Posts: 6,198
And1: 2,353
Joined: Mar 22, 2009
 

Re: GM A TEAM Spring 2011 - Writeups 

Post#25 » by BIRDMAN BIRDMAN » Thu May 12, 2011 11:41 am

Spurs

- will edit asap
:hug:
User avatar
lukekarts
Head Coach
Posts: 7,168
And1: 336
Joined: Dec 11, 2009
Location: UK
   

Re: GM A TEAM Spring 2011 - Writeups 

Post#26 » by lukekarts » Thu May 12, 2011 3:11 pm

If writeups are not up by 7pm ET tonight (8 hours time) then I will get the rankings started without you.

Rankings to be posted in this thread. Email confirmation coming later...
There is no consolation prize. Winning is everything.
User avatar
lukekarts
Head Coach
Posts: 7,168
And1: 336
Joined: Dec 11, 2009
Location: UK
   

Re: GM A TEAM Spring 2011 - Writeups 

Post#27 » by lukekarts » Fri May 13, 2011 10:02 am

Ok, the following teams are eligible to be ranked.

BOS
CHI
CLE
DAL
DEN
IND
GSW
LAC
MEM
MIL
MIN
NJN
NOH
NYK
ORL
PHI
PHO
POR
TOR
UTA
WAS

Thanks guys for contributing with writeups. 21 is a decent number.

Rankings can now be posted. Please put post them in this topic.

Rank 1-20 on best overall job (excluding your own team).
Nominate the team you think will be the 2011/12 NBA Champions.
Nominate the team you think will be best in 5 years time.
There is no consolation prize. Winning is everything.
User avatar
lukekarts
Head Coach
Posts: 7,168
And1: 336
Joined: Dec 11, 2009
Location: UK
   

Re: GM A TEAM Spring 2011 - Writeups 

Post#28 » by lukekarts » Fri May 13, 2011 10:29 am

Utah's Overall Rankings are now in:

1. Washington
2. Denver
3. New York
4. New Jersey
5. Minnesota
6. Indiana
7. Portland
8. Toronto
9. Phoenix
10. GSW
11. Philly
12. Orlando
13. NOH
14. Dallas
15. Chicago
16. LA Clippers
17. Memphis
18. Cleveland
19. Boston
20. Milwaukee
There is no consolation prize. Winning is everything.
User avatar
lukekarts
Head Coach
Posts: 7,168
And1: 336
Joined: Dec 11, 2009
Location: UK
   

Re: GM A TEAM Spring 2011 - Writeups 

Post#29 » by lukekarts » Fri May 13, 2011 11:19 am

Portland's rankings

1. WAS - Really good job to acquire Rose, got Gasol at just the right time. Support cast is nice though probably lacks a true 2nd option to contend. Well placed to trade for one though.

2. NJN - BI accomplishes the ownerships goal of contending for titles. Probably only has a two year window, but then has the opportunity to retool via FA when Nash, Calderon, Manu and VC are off the books.

3. MIN - Not a title favourite but will make the playoffs and has some great complimentary pieces and a good front court, as well as excellent D. +30-35 wins IMO.

4. DEN - Good job on becoming a title contender, though the payroll will be hurting.

5. NYK - Much deeper and better defensively, though a little old in places. I think lacks a true second scorer next to Melo to win a title but will push New Jersey hard in the conference finals.

6. TOR - good progress for the Raptors though I question re-acquiring Bosh.

7. GSW - stellar job considering the team inherited, really could've done with acquiring a better Center in FA but other than that, pretty good.

8. IND - a nice rebuild in terms of getting good prospects together, unlucky not to have moved Roy

9. UTA - Loaded with assets, Biyombo, Nogueira, Jones, Casspi, Lee represenets a lot of potential off the bench. Fields, Gallo, Favors will be a good core. Lacks a real elite scoring talent but well placed to acquire one in the future.

10. BOS - really tough for me to rank. I think there are improvements over current Boston, although I am not sure how Pierce will cope at SG (defensively) and other teams around have got stronger (NY/NJ)

11. PHO - Kees' first good job. Would've been better with Gasol instead of Jefferson, but has at least given the franchise two long-term pieces which is a big step forward.

12. PHI - Totally gutted the team to build around Cousins, Young and the number 2 pick. In the long run will reap the benefits, in the short term the team will struggle particularly due to the erratic front court non-existent back court.

13. NOH - solid rebuild, I have more faith in Turner than most and Rubio will be an asset at PG if he adapts to the NBA. Took a chance on Blatche, has a good defensive core, though at this moment in time lacks scoring. Decent position for a tough franchise.

14. MEM - Probably hurts due to the Grizzlies good playoff run, but I think the upgrades at PG and C are notable. Only concern is the team maybe lacks wing scoring but J-Rich plays well off a good PG and Odom is a nice 4th option. All goes wrong if CP3 leaves though.

15. DAL - solid rebuild job but puts too much faith in Hayward and Henderson.

16 LAC - this team drew the most widely dispersed rankings and I can see why. I don't see JaVale as an improvement on DeAndre; the subtraction of Kaman is a loss but given his injury history, not too significant. Overall, improvements at PG, SF and depth, loss at SG and C.

17. ORL - better positioned in the long run but lacks interior defence which will mean the team is stuck in current NY territory. Dumped the bad deals but also lost Dwight

18. CHI - solid rebuild job though I am not sure rebulding the league's top ranked team makes sense.

19. CLE - minor improvements, was unlucky to miss on a top pick, probably shouldn't have traded Varejao and Hickson

20. MIL - I drafted Kyrie Irving with the Milwaukee 1st, which had been traded. Says it all really.

I have to say, this set of rankings was the toughest across the last 3 games, mainly because so many people who did writeups did really good jobs. Only 4 teams IMO got worse than they started, and even then (Orlando specifically), it was a necessary evil due to where they started.

2012 Champion - New Jersey Nets.
Went all out to acquire Dwight and Nash, added a great closer in Manu, which is a really well balanced trio. Nash and Manu may fade but the front court is young and this team would be great to watch.

Best team in 5 years - Washington Wizards.
Prime Rose, Prime Marc Gasol, and whatever becomes of the supporting cast. It's a safe bet; teams like Utah, Indiana and Minnesota push bryant close on this one, and deserve a mention

Edited - re-read my rankings and made a small tweak to 13-16.
There is no consolation prize. Winning is everything.
moss_is_1
RealGM
Posts: 10,971
And1: 2,385
Joined: May 20, 2009
   

Re: GM A TEAM Spring 2011 - Writeups 

Post#30 » by moss_is_1 » Fri May 13, 2011 5:49 pm

1. Denver - Took a team that had no true franchise player, and brings in 2 top 5 players, an all-star pg, an all-star center(even if he may not be deserving), and a great complimentary piece in Chandler. Then he also has a very good bench. Money will be tight, but he has most of his key guys locked in for awhile.

2. Washington - Didn't have a whole lot to work with, got a true franchise guy in Rose, and a real nice front court in Lee and Gasol. Really helped out when he ended up getting the Milwaukee 1st and then Milwaukee decided to rebuild.

3. Minnesota - Has a good player at every spot in the starting 5. Has real good defense, and very athletic as well.

4.NJN - Has 2 superstars and a borderline star in Manu. Dwight/Nash should be a really good combo for the next couple of seasons, also has a couple nice roleplayers to fit in as well.

5. GSW - Considering what the Gm before had done, he really improved them. Used his capspace very well, and acquired a PF who is rising fast with his play in the postseason.

6. Portland - Got rid of the older bigger contracts in Roy, Camby, Miller. Got a nice core to go with Aldridge, although I'm not near as high on Irving as everyone else, he should still be a good player. Deng is a really nice player, and is showing his value this season.

7. Utah - Has a bunch of good assets to rebuild with. Should be able to find a core group and then use the others in trades to get some bigger names/better scoring.

8. NYK - Did a solid job of building around Melo. Made the team a lot more balanced instead of being very reliant on 2-3 guys. Should have really good defense all around Melo, might lack shooting though.

9. Memphis - Acquired a legit superstar, and the 2nd-3rd best center in the game. Artest/Jrich give him some solid vets to help out, and then his bench has a couple okay pieces as well.

10. Indiana - Has a lot of nice young pieces, and even with Roy should be able to afford a real nice player in the offseason.

11. Boston - Has more depth, and a few more assets then current Boston. Although like Luke, I'm not too sold on Pierce at sg on defense.

12. LAC - Upgraded the PG spot, got rid of bad contracts and stayed nearly the same in talent. Also has a lot of money to throw at someone in the offseason.

13. NOH - I love Rubio, but he needs some more scoring to go with him. AV doesn't really fit in age-wise with the rest of the team either.

14. PHO - Did a nice job to get rid of the longer deals, but I've seen what Al does as the #1 guy, and it's not great. The pieces around him aren't great, but Felton should give him a nice pg to grow with as they are similar in age.

15. Philly - Not a big fan of Cousins like everyone else, but he should have a very good frontcourt in the future with him, Randolph, and Derrick Williams, but the backcourt is really really weak. Flynn is terrible, and Anderson is a big ? without seeing much time at all.

16. Dallas - Decided to rebuild and did a solid job overall. I am a big fan of Oden if he can get healthy, and he's a nice compliment to Lopez. Henderson is emerging as a real nice player, and he should have a lot of space to sign another piece.

17. Chicago - Has a lot of assets, although I wouldn't of decided to blow it up, he did a nice job on it. Has a hole at sf that I would of liked to see him flip Augustin, Bledsoe, or one of the crawfords for, but he should have cap as well to get one.

18. Orlando - Traded Dwight, and has a lot of bad deals on the books as well. Should be awhile before he gets to fully rebuild, and he should be stuck in no mans land where he might make the playoffs but won't get far.

19. Cleveland- Pretty weak defensively, and not a fan of a Bargs/Ilyasova frontcourt.

20. Milwaukee - I think he struggled at first to decide what he wanted to do. He wanted to contend so he traded his draft pick, and then decided to rebuild and lost out on #1 overall. I think he saw an improvement when he took over on the PHX job because he stuck with a plan for the most part.

Nominate the team you think will be the 2011/12 NBA Champions. - Denver Nuggets again. Just too much star power IMO, and he also has a great bench.

Nominate the team you think will be best in 5 years time - Wizards. Rose will keep getting better as Gasol, Batum, Matthews will as well.
sterncohen
Bench Warmer
Posts: 1,423
And1: 59
Joined: Oct 07, 2006

Re: GM A TEAM Spring 2011 - Writeups & Rankings (from p2)) 

Post#31 » by sterncohen » Fri May 13, 2011 6:50 pm

LAC rankings

1. Denver. Championship contender for several years to come. And it's a real team, with a bench and everything, and pieces that fit together. Terrific job.

2. Minnesota. Gave up one proven star (Love) and some big maybes (Rubio, Beasley, Johnson), wound up with one All-Star (Horford) and three near All-Stars (Nene, Gay, Iguodala). Not a great shooting team, but huge improvement.

3. Washington. Again, giant leap in total talent. Basically upgraded every position in the lineup. I'm not as high on Batum or Matthews as some others are, and I don't see this as a championship caliber team, but given the starting point a huge accomplishment.

4. Toronto. Bosh and Johnson are much better than anybody on the current Raptors, and Holiday is likely to be as well. This was a team I thought you couldn't do much with, and Moss proved me wrong.

5. Golden State. Extra credit for making something decent after the previous owner took a bad team and made it worse.

6. Boston. I haven't seen this approach to the Celtics before in the game - hold on to enough talent to stay in competition, and arguably even go further right now because the team has a real C in Okafor, while getting younger with Boozer and Wallace replacing Garnett and Allen. Would have been higher but for the nutty contract for Jeff Green.

7. Indiana. Noah and Davis are a vastly improved front-court. If Walker is a big-time scorer, this will be a good team; if not, though, I don't see where the offense comes from. Better than the current Pacers either way.

8. New York. Mixed on this. Lots of talent but I don't see it adding up to a championship, and given the age of Garnett and Battier it will decline pretty fast. Unless Devin Harris returns to his play of two years ago, which now looks like a real long-shot, the offense is pretty much limited to Anthony, and he can't get it done by himself.

9. Portland. Big points for acquiring Kyrie Irving. Deng will fit beautifully, and he cleared away Roy's contract. Downsides are that center is a significant weakness and no wing other than Deng can guard anybody.

10. Sacramento. Given the continued chance that Cousins flames out, replacing him with Love is a big plus. There are some other nice pieces and I think the overall talent level here is probably higher than the starting point, despite the trade of Evans; not convinced it's enough for a real contender.

11. New Jersey. Black Ice has done his usual great job at bringing in a lot of talent, so I realize I'm going lower here than many others will. But I see this as a team poised to fall apart - not quite good enough to win now, and given the age of Nash and Ginobili, and the near impossibility of adding more talent, I think the risk that Howard leaves is very high.

12. Memphis. Not sure what to think here. Paul and Bogut is a wonderful combo, and there are enough good role players around them to make this team interesting in the short run. But with Richardson and Odom aging, does Paul really stay in Memphis for more than a year?

13. Utah. I agree with the decision to break the team down. Favors and Gallinari could both be very good; much less convinced about the rest of the cast, and PG is a serious weakness. I don't think there's enough here to attract a top-tier free agent next year.

14. New Orleans. Similar to the above - good choice to go young, but not convinced by the level of the talent brought in.

15. Philadelphia. Another one where I could see a much higher ranking by others, and if Cousins turns out to be a superstar it would be justified. But the potential frontcourt gains seem to me to be pretty much offset by significant declines on the wing and especially at PG.

16. Phoenix. Didn't he have Bosh for a minute there? Holding on to him probably would have left this team higher.

17. Dallas. The three best players are centers, and there's just not enough talent elsewhere.

18. Chicago. Big improvement at SG with Eric Gordon more than offset by declines at every other position in the starting lineup.

19. Orlando. If Evans had a second year like his first, I'd revise this quite a bit upward. Without that, though, this looks like a team that has lost one of the three or four best players in the league without making up the difference elsewhere.

20. Cleveland. No better off than before, I'm afraid.

21. Milwaukee. Gave up the team's best assets (Bogut, multiple first round picks, Jennings) without returning value.

Likeliest team to win now: Denver
5 years from now: I'm stumped.
User avatar
why22
Analyst
Posts: 3,530
And1: 16
Joined: Nov 26, 2008
Location: T Dot

Re: GM A TEAM Spring 2011 - Writeups & Rankings (from p2)) 

Post#32 » by why22 » Fri May 13, 2011 7:12 pm

Washington
2. Denver
3. New York
4. New Jersey
5. Minnesota
6. Indiana
7. Portland
8. Toronto
9. Phoenix
10. GSW
11. Philly
12. Orlando
13. NOH
14. Dallas
15. Boston
16. LA Clippers
17. Memphis
18. Cleveland
19. Chicago
20. Milwaukee
Basketball_Jones wrote:BC holding Casey accountable would go like this:

BC: so I see you played Andrea quite a bit there when he was struggling
Casey: yeah I know, we needed spacing
BC: play him more (walks away)
Crispy
Senior
Posts: 589
And1: 12
Joined: Feb 19, 2009

Re: GM A TEAM Spring 2011 - Writeups & Rankings (from p2)) 

Post#33 » by Crispy » Fri May 13, 2011 8:17 pm

1. Washington. Just a huge upgrade all around and they managed to stay young as well.

2. Denver. Wade and Dirk is a great duo and they have above avg role players around them.

3. Toronto. Just like Minny, had little to work with before (maybe even less), and ended up with a team that could legitimately contend.

4. Minnesota. Love what they did here, great improvement all around.

5. Boston. Really like what they did, definitely have one of the best teams in the league.

6. Portland. Were able to stay young while making a legit contender. Irving/Aldridge should be nice.

7. Los Angeles Clippers. Love what they did here. Liked that Harden/Lawson for Gordon trade.

8. Golden State. Considering what they started with, I really like their trio of Curry/Smith/Z-Bo going forward.

9. New York. Really improved defensively, should have enough scoring between Melo, Harris, Hill, KG, West.

10. Memphis. I like this team a lot, definitely improved from before. But will it be enough for CP3 to stay?

11. Indiana. A great rebuilding job. Has the potential to be a really well balanced team.

12. New Jersey. They definitely have enough for a 1 year run at a title. But if they fall short, it will be a fail.

13. Chicago. Yeah they have a great future, but there wasn't really a logical reason to rebuild.

14. Sacramento. Like the pieces they added, but I kind of liked the Evans/Cousins duo more.

15. Utah. Decent job here. I'm high on Favors, so good job keeping him.

16. Phoenix. Considering they were taken over late in the game, I'll say their heading in a good direction.

17. New Orleans. To me, they didn't get enough for CP3, and I'm not all that high on Rubio.

18. Orlando. Evans/Stoudemire was a nice return for Dwight, but they weren't able to imrpove anywhere else.

19. Dallas. Lopez and two top picks in 2012 are a big plus, but they don't have much else.

20. Cleveland. Don't see any improvement really.

21. Milwaukee. Trading their picks will really set them back, and they didn't get back enough talent.


Win Now: Denver
5 Years: Bulls. Team has 4 potential All-Stars in the starting 5, not to mention guys like Augustin, Bledsoe, Vesley, and Crawford on the bench.
User avatar
-Kees-
Lead Assistant
Posts: 5,155
And1: 54
Joined: Jan 16, 2011
   

Re: GM A TEAM Spring 2011 - Writeups & Rankings (from p2)) 

Post#34 » by -Kees- » Fri May 13, 2011 11:35 pm

RANKINGS:

1. DEN: They have a legit title contender, and maybe the best team in the league. They have a future as well in Parker, Amir, Chandler, Lou ect.

2. NJ: Really a perfect fit of players here, with Nash being the playmaker/shooter, Dwight being the low post scorer/defensive stopper, and Manu as the closer.

3. TOR: A little worried about the age difference between Jrue and the rest, but a great job here. Really balanced, and all 5 guys have a distinct role that fits them well.

4. WAS: First of all to get rid of Shard's contract without giving up much was amazing. Then you bring in a very solid starting 5 that is very young.

5. NY: Took a need and filled it, which was defense. A little worried about scoring, but I think West/KG/Harris can score enough with Melo to get them to the Conference Finals.

6. IND: I really like what they did here. Reminds me somewhat of the OKC team in RL. I think Kemba can be that star, Noah/Davis is the best future defensive front court out there, and both George and Wes have star potential and both focus on D.

7. LAC: If there was one place for a knucklehead like McGee to be, it would be next to good character players, and that's where he is. I also see Harden>=Gordon, because of defensive reasons, and Lawson/Wright are great compliments to the rest of the team.

8. POR: Irving/LMA will be very good in the future. I think the team is very well rounded as well.

9. MIN: Solid starting 5, but worried about the bench. Also, having Turk on a younger team like this doesn't help things out.

10. SAC: I think Roddy is extremely underrated, I think he can be a 20 ppg player. I like Afflalo, I think he's a solid piece to win a title. Jordan makes up for Love's lack of defensive ability.

11. GSW: Did well considering what they started with. A little concerned about Smoove playing on the perimeter the whole game though.

12. BOS: In better position then where they were, adding Hickson was a great move. Concerned about Pierce playing the 2, he's having trouble staying in front of 3's right now...

13. NOH: Built what I think is a great core of players. Rubio/Turner/Dudley/Blatche/Andy is a great lineup that really fits well together.

14. MEM: Got CP3, Bogut which is very good. I think age is a bit of an issue, and can they keep CP3 with this team? I'm not sure.

15. UTA: Don't really like the lack of PG, but I can understand wanting CP3/DWILL, but I think that's a bit too much of a risk. Favors/Gallo is a nice 1-2 punch, but not sure if it's A) enough to get a top tier PG and B) got the defensive strengths to win a title.

16. PHI: Has lots and lots of young talent, but needs to spread it out. Not all of Cousins/Young/Williams/Randolph can play at the end of games together, but I think one trade solves that problem.

17. CHI: 2 things. 1. There was no reason to rebuild. 2. Even though you did, I don't think it's a good fit. I think Monroe/Hibbert on the floor together will limit you offensively, and you don't have a consistent SF or PF.

18. CLE: Bargs and Burks are 2 nice building pieces, but taking on Arenas' contract is tough. Otherwise it's a good job.

19. DAL: Not too thrilled with this team. I don't think Oden/Lopez is a good fit, as they are both true C's. Also, there isn't much on the wing. Hayward/Henderson are decent, but not fully developed and not too strong defensively.

2012 TITLE WINNER: NJ
2017 TITLE WINNER: IND

Nice job guys. Thanks to Luke for being the commish and for BI for helping with the draft/approving trades.
skorff26
Analyst
Posts: 3,000
And1: 17
Joined: Dec 05, 2006

Re: GM A TEAM Spring 2011 - Writeups 

Post#35 » by skorff26 » Sat May 14, 2011 5:55 am

lukekarts wrote:Utah's Overall Rankings are now in:

1. Washington
2. Denver
3. New York
4. New Jersey
5. Minnesota
6. Indiana
7. Portland
8. Toronto
9. Phoenix
10. GSW
11. Philly
12. Orlando
13. NOH
14. Dallas
15. Chicago
16. LA Clippers
17. Memphis
18. Cleveland
19. Boston
20. Milwaukee

Thanks I didn't know if I'd be on to post it or not.

Brief reason why
1. Washington - Not only did they acquire the MVP of the NBA, but they were able to upgrade the other 4 positions with young talent.
2. Denver - They have 2 superstars on their team, and their other 3 starters are pretty solid as well.
3. New York - Great team with players that compliment each other well. It's a solid core of players.
4. New Jersey - There team compliments each other very nicely, but they would have a short window to win. Might not be the best moves for the long-term, but NJ is dying for a competitive team and they have one now
5. Minnesota - Awesome team, would be higher but w/o a clear cut #1 option I'm not sure if they can really be consistent title contenders.
6. Indiana - A few years, this team will be scary if they develop.
7. Portland - I really like pairing Deng and Irving with LMA.
8. Toronto - Instead of having mediocre talent making a lot of money, they now got some players who can play making a lot of money and can be a solid playoff team for a few years.
9. Phoenix - Felton is a nice Nash successor, and BigAl finally gives them a decent big man
10. GSW - The reason they're so high is the addition of Josh Smith, Josh Smith and Curry would be great building blocks for this team.
11. Philly - a nice young duo with Williams and Cousins.
12. Orlando - same as NOH, hard to trade your star player, but he did get out of some ugly contracts as well, and Evans and Amare are some nice build blocks.
13. NOH - Having to trade Paul hurts, but having quite a few 1st rounders in 2012, Turner, Donatas, and Rubio; it's started to go in the right direction
14. Dallas - I really like their future, but as evident in this years playoffs, they are title contenders before the game started. And as much as I like their core of young guys, I think there's 2-3 teams out their that have a better future then they do.
15. Chicago - Might be a bit of an unfair ranking, but they are a young team that have a chance to win multiple titles prior to the game. Right now they still have a solid team for the future, but I think they've pushed back a title opportunity by 4 years.
16. LA Clippers - Uprgrade PG and SF which is a big need, but trading Gordon hurts since I don't see an impact player that can replace him.
17. Memphis - hard to put them this low when they get Chris Paul, but they're an injury away (with some injury prone players) from being a very mediocre team (like the current NOH team) and I don't think Paul has a good enough supporting cast to want to stay.
18. Cleveland - Their current roster and new roster have a lot of similarities, they are lower since I think they could have gotten a better player then Burks with their 1st rounder, and they ended up with Arenas which almost automatically drops you 5 spots.
19. Boston - This was tough putting them so low, but IMO the current Boston team is better then this team. I think the downgrade from KG to Boozer really hurts.
20. Milwaukee - I don't want to be too harsh, but Milwaukee was voted the worst team during the regular season and somehow had traded their #1 pick this year and next. Plus there's no one near Bogut's value on the team right now, and I think Humphries and Brooks got severely overpaid.

2012 Champion - I think San Antonio would win it but no rankings were submitted... so my pick is the New Jersey Nets.

Best Team in 5 years - Chicago, Wall/Gordon/Monroe with HIbbert and Vesley has a chance to be something special
User avatar
babyjax13
RealGM
Posts: 35,895
And1: 18,411
Joined: Jul 02, 2006
Location: Fresno, eating Birria
     

Re: GM A TEAM Spring 2011 - Writeups & Rankings (from p2)) 

Post#36 » by babyjax13 » Sat May 14, 2011 3:51 pm

Dallas Rankings
Washington
Denver
New York
New Jersey
Golden State
Minnesota
LA Clippers
Indiana
Philadelphia
Toronto
Portland
Sacramento
Orlando
Utah
Chicago
Phoenix
Memphis
New Orleans
Milwaukee

Now: Denver
5-years: Washington
Image

JazzMatt13 wrote:just because I think aliens probably have to do with JFK, doesn't mean my theory that Jazz will never get Wiggins, isn't true.

JColl
User avatar
dan_atko97
Lead Assistant
Posts: 4,645
And1: 287
Joined: Jul 08, 2010
Location: Brisbane
   

Re: GM A TEAM Spring 2011 - Writeups & Rankings (from p2)) 

Post#37 » by dan_atko97 » Sun May 15, 2011 6:14 am

Washington Wizards
Denver Nuggets
Toronto Raptors
New Jersey Nets
Portland Trail Blazers
Golden State Warriors
Memphis Grizzlies
New York Knicks
Indiana Pacers
LA Clippers
Utah Jazz
Boston Celtics
Dallas Mavericks
Philadelphia 76ers
Phoenix Suns
New Orleans Hornets
Chicago Bulls
Orlando Magic
Cleveland Caveliers
Milwaukee Bucks

Winner Next 2011/2012= Nuggets vs Nets...?
Winner 5 years= Wizards
Image
london sonic
Pro Prospect
Posts: 906
And1: 0
Joined: May 24, 2008

Re: GM A TEAM Spring 2011 - Writeups & Rankings (from p2)) 

Post#38 » by london sonic » Sun May 15, 2011 11:57 pm

WINNER- DENVER
BEST TEAM IN 5 YRS- WIZARDS
NBA Champs
Banned User
Posts: 258
And1: 0
Joined: Apr 24, 2011

Re: GM A TEAM Spring 2011 - Writeups & Rankings (from p2)) 

Post#39 » by NBA Champs » Mon May 16, 2011 12:06 am

Winner - Celtics.
User avatar
TMACFORMVP
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 18,947
And1: 161
Joined: Jun 30, 2006
Location: 9th Seed

Re: GM A TEAM Spring 2011 - Writeups & Rankings (from p2)) 

Post#40 » by TMACFORMVP » Tue May 17, 2011 2:55 am

I'm real sorry, very busy at the moment. I'll have a little time tomorrow, where I could do the rankings, but I don't think it matters too much, does it? I'd have Washington first as well (I TOLD him this a LONG time ago that he had this on lock). I'd probably have a variation of Toronto, New Jersey, Minnesota, among others as the other contenders. I'll try to get in a full ranking tomorrow if allowed, but unfortunately can't make any promises.

Return to Trades and Transactions Games