Non-Dynastic Vintage Champions - Discussion

migya · Post #21 » by **migya** » Sun Mar 16, 2025 10:35 am

Want to trade spots?

Laimbeer wrote:ok

Laimbeer · Post #22 » by **Laimbeer** » Sun Mar 16, 2025 4:34 pm

kdawg32086 wrote:This looks like a fun set of teams for a draft. I'm in, if I can team up with someone since I'm not sure if I can be active enough for the window between picks with my work schedule.

Up

Post #23 » by **kdawg32086** » Sun Mar 16, 2025 4:49 pm

migya wrote:...

Your turn to pick.

Post #24 » by **kdawg32086** » Sun Mar 16, 2025 5:23 pm

Laimbeer wrote:
kdawg32086 wrote:This looks like a fun set of teams for a draft. I'm in, if I can team up with someone since I'm not sure if I can be active enough for the window between picks with my work schedule.

Up

Nice pick. I was gonna take which ever one of the 2 centers that you didn't.

Laimbeer · Post #25 » by **Laimbeer** » Sun Mar 16, 2025 6:42 pm

kdawg32086 wrote:
Laimbeer wrote:
kdawg32086 wrote:This looks like a fun set of teams for a draft. I'm in, if I can team up with someone since I'm not sure if I can be active enough for the window between picks with my work schedule.

Up

Nice pick. I was gonna take which ever one of the 2 centers that you didn't.

Thanks. Wilt's 1964 season at 12.8 fga is absurd.

Post #26 » by **Fadeaway_J** » Sun Mar 16, 2025 6:56 pm

Laimbeer wrote:
kdawg32086 wrote:
Laimbeer wrote:
Up

Nice pick. I was gonna take which ever one of the 2 centers that you didn't.

Thanks. Wilt's 1964 season at 12.8 fga is absurd.

It's 1967 - 1964 is just a tad more expensive :lol:

Laimbeer · Post #27 » by **Laimbeer** » Sun Mar 16, 2025 6:59 pm

Fadeaway_J wrote:
Laimbeer wrote:
kdawg32086 wrote:
Nice pick. I was gonna take which ever one of the 2 centers that you didn't.

Thanks. Wilt's 1964 season at 12.8 fga is absurd.

It's 1967 - 1964 is just a tad more expensive

Oh yeah forgot Sixers were eligible.

JimmyPlopper · Post #28 » by **JimmyPlopper** » Sun Mar 16, 2025 7:22 pm

Laimbeer wrote:
Fadeaway_J wrote:
Laimbeer wrote:
Thanks. Wilt's 1964 season at 12.8 fga is absurd.

It's 1967 - 1964 is just a tad more expensive

Oh yeah forgot Sixers were eligible.

I'm guessing you were also looking at FG made instead of attempted since the 15.1 X 0.85 = 12.8.

Imagine if you took the 1962 season: 39.5 FGA/G :lol:

Post #29 » by **Snakebites** » Sun Mar 16, 2025 7:33 pm

I think you can make a case for either Wilt or Kareem for the first pick assuming the Sixers are eligible (which I understand they are). I don't think there's any case for Wilt as the first pick (and I don't know when I'd take him- not second either) if forced to take a Warriors season.

Seems like Laimbeer accidentally made a perfectly fine pick.

durantbird · Post #30 » by **durantbird** » Sun Mar 16, 2025 7:49 pm

Fade has my options for round 1. I'll be available to provide my round 2 selection only tomorrow, if you even get to me by EOD

Post #31 » by **Snakebites** » Mon Mar 17, 2025 12:01 am

Would have been cool to see the ABA Champion Nets and Pacers in this.

Obviously not suggesting anything be changed now- much too late. Would have been a cool nod though.

Post #32 » by **Fadeaway_J** » Mon Mar 17, 2025 1:16 am

MadNESS wrote:.

Up

Post #33 » by **MadNESS** » Mon Mar 17, 2025 1:49 am

wackbone wrote:Sure

Up

wackbone · Post #34 » by **wackbone** » Mon Mar 17, 2025 1:55 am

durantbird wrote:Fade has my options for round 1. I'll be available to provide my round 2 selection only tomorrow, if you even get to me by EOD

Fadeaway_J wrote:.

JimmyPlopper · Post #35 » by **JimmyPlopper** » Mon Mar 17, 2025 2:57 am

Snakebites wrote:Would have been cool to see the ABA Champion Nets and Pacers in this.

Obviously not suggesting anything be changed now- much too late. Would have been a cool nod though.

your turn Snake

migya · Post #36 » by **migya** » Mon Mar 17, 2025 2:59 am

Oscar Robertson should be viewed as the alltime great, arguably top ten player that he is. He is often overlooked. He is the most complete PG, probably among all guards, ever.

ReggiesKnicks · Post #37 » by **ReggiesKnicks** » Mon Mar 17, 2025 3:08 am

migya wrote:Oscar Robertson should be viewed as the alltime great, arguably top ten player that he is. He is often overlooked. He is the most complete PG, probably among all guards, ever.

I just hope that everyone views every single one of my draft picks as the best players in the draft.

JimmyPlopper · Post #38 » by **JimmyPlopper** » Mon Mar 17, 2025 3:10 am

ReggiesKnicks wrote:
migya wrote:Oscar Robertson should be viewed as the alltime great, arguably top ten player that he is. He is often overlooked. He is the most complete PG, probably among all guards, ever.

I just hope that everyone views every single one of my draft picks as the best players in the draft.

JimmyPlopper · Post #39 » by **JimmyPlopper** » Mon Mar 17, 2025 3:13 am

JimmyPlopper wrote:
ReggiesKnicks wrote:
migya wrote:Oscar Robertson should be viewed as the alltime great, arguably top ten player that he is. He is often overlooked. He is the most complete PG, probably among all guards, ever.

I just hope that everyone views every single one of my draft picks as the best players in the draft.

I'm a big O fan, so it will influence my votes.

I'm interested to see how many folks select players from the 60s which is usually off the table for us in these drafts. That adds a very fun element.

migya · Post #40 » by **migya** » Mon Mar 17, 2025 3:26 am

JimmyPlopper wrote:
JimmyPlopper wrote:
ReggiesKnicks wrote:
I just hope that everyone views every single one of my draft picks as the best players in the draft.

I'm a big O fan, so it will influence my votes.

I'm interested to see how many folks select players from the 60s which is usually off the table for us in these drafts. That adds a very fun element.

Wouldn't be right for lack of three point shooting of past eras, especially for alltime great perimeter players, to diminish them.