NBA/ABA Decades League Discussion Thread

bastillon · Post #201 » by **bastillon** » Sun Feb 21, 2010 10:33 pm

who are gonna be the judges for the 2nd Round ?

All In The Name · Post #202 » by **All In The Name** » Mon Feb 22, 2010 12:53 am

All of the judges from the first round are welcome to judge, as are all eliminated first round posters.

Post #203 » by **CellarDoor** » Mon Feb 22, 2010 11:12 pm

It's odd that Sabas' team is called the "tall firs", and only one position features a player taller than mine.

Also, I'm very tempted to edit your post and screw with the team names and pictures...

Seriously, it's taking a lot of restraint.

SabasRevenge! · Post #204 » by **SabasRevenge!** » Mon Feb 22, 2010 11:46 pm

CellarDoor wrote:It's odd that Sabas' team is called the "tall firs", and only one position features a player taller than mine.

Also, I'm very tempted to edit your post and screw with the team names and pictures...

Seriously, it's taking a lot of restraint.

Yeah, well we play bigger!

...and Hawk is a tweener. Ha!

Post #205 » by **Gremz** » Tue Feb 23, 2010 12:27 am

I won't be judging this round.

Post #206 » by **Miller4ever** » Tue Feb 23, 2010 5:29 am

^^And that makes you Futurama-cancellation lame.

Post #207 » by **Snakebites** » Tue Feb 23, 2010 5:44 am

I, on the other hand, have every intention of judging.

Get your writeups up, people!

Post #208 » by **CellarDoor** » Tue Feb 23, 2010 6:18 am

Snakebites wrote:I, on the other hand, have every intention of judging.

Get your writeups up, people!

My team got past yours...surely that's worth a vote...right?

Right?

Post #209 » by **Snakebites** » Tue Feb 23, 2010 7:03 am

Warspite · Post #210 » by **Warspite** » Tue Feb 23, 2010 7:33 am

Snakebites wrote:I, on the other hand, have every intention of judging.

Get your writeups up, people!

+1

Yeah GMs clean up your BS and keep your propaganda to yourself. Your not going to be able to convince me that your PG can get 10rpg.

bastillon · Post #211 » by **bastillon** » Tue Feb 23, 2010 1:46 pm

some deadline to put up writeups would be nice :wink:

Post #212 » by **CellarDoor** » Tue Feb 23, 2010 4:40 pm

^Agreed...only three write-ups in is dragging this out hardcore. I'm already going to be writing up for two games at once soon here

Post #213 » by **Miller4ever** » Tue Feb 23, 2010 8:40 pm

I put my write-up up.

Post #214 » by **Snakebites** » Tue Feb 23, 2010 11:47 pm

I'd like to register my amusement that Cellar apologizes for the length of a writeup that is dwarfed by the first PORTION of one of Tmac's writeups in the previous game.

bastillon · Post #215 » by **bastillon** » Wed Feb 24, 2010 12:08 am

haha, I wish I was english-speaking native. well said. after all these great writeups in the first round I expected everyone to bring their A game, but can't say it's a lot more than C so far. btw. Black Ice vs Tmac matchups is AMAZING

Post #216 » by **CellarDoor** » Wed Feb 24, 2010 12:20 am

I've gotten a LOT of complaints in the past about the length of my write-ups...I'm making a conscious effort to shorten them up because of this.

Post #217 » by **Miller4ever** » Wed Feb 24, 2010 12:33 am

You can keep the length and do what I did: put hot pictures of hot girls in between segments and nobody will complain about how long it is.

EDIT: Seriously, though, I think writeups would be a lot less tedious if they were less stream of consciousness and more organized. You can always say more during a rebuttal. I know when I feel like I've won I write less, because the points speak for themselves.

SabasRevenge! · Post #218 » by **SabasRevenge!** » Wed Feb 24, 2010 2:33 am

Worked on my write up this morning and will have it up by tomorrow afternoon.

Post #219 » by **Snakebites** » Wed Feb 24, 2010 2:35 am

A note on rebuttals:

I'm only allowing one day after the second writeup is posted. After that point, I reserve to right to judge.

Post #220 » by **CellarDoor** » Wed Feb 24, 2010 2:48 am

Miller4ever wrote:You can keep the length and do what I did: put hot pictures of hot girls in between segments and nobody will complain about how long it is.

EDIT: Seriously, though, I think writeups would be a lot less tedious if they were less stream of consciousness and more organized. You can always say more during a rebuttal. I know when I feel like I've won I write less, because the points speak for themselves.

So what you're saying is TMAC's already lost?