euroleague wrote:Some of these dips were tempting, but I couldn’t resist Rodman here. 18rpg makes him unreal value off the bench
Only need 42 for the next 7 guys, meaning 6 per guy. Initially, it’s 8 per guy, which is quite a bit harder
Up
Moderators: Snakebites, MadNESS, Fadeaway_J
euroleague wrote:Some of these dips were tempting, but I couldn’t resist Rodman here. 18rpg makes him unreal value off the bench
Only need 42 for the next 7 guys, meaning 6 per guy. Initially, it’s 8 per guy, which is quite a bit harder

parsnips33 wrote:Wade and Kobe pairing![]()
Has that ever been done before?
Snakebites wrote:Heat4lyf wrote:I’m going full fun in this one. There will still be conventional picks from time to time, but no boring picks.
Up.
Hornets all in on the wings. Will be a challenge to build the rest of that team.
Snakebites wrote:In terms of general draft comments- I'll say this:
I thought KG would go higher. Like, I’d have taken him as high as 4 or 5 even. Most of the big rebounders present a conundrum- you need good rebounders at other spots too, but spacing becomes a concern since the big rebounders are usually not good shooters. KG is a stretch big who's also a great rebounder and can therefore potentially be paired with another great rebounder without compromising fit.
That's huge.


ardee wrote:Up.


MadNESS wrote:I forgot Snake picked before me![]()
Giannis, Pippen, Hill - bing bang boom

Snakebites wrote:MadNESS wrote:I forgot Snake picked before me![]()
Giannis, Pippen, Hill - bing bang boom
Sorry Ness. I thought I might be screwing you there.
Hill is pretty valuable here. I’d have been surprised to see him reach you even if I’d gone another way.
There’s another player I really live who I haven’t used much who I wanted to take, but Hill just made too much sense especially given I can even use him as a point guard if things get tight.
wackbone wrote:There are lots of MVPs still on the board, but two in particular stand out. One is a center who doesn't have a great FGA to RPG ratio, and the other is a PG with an even worse ratio, but again he should theoretically have the fewest on the team anyways. Tons of other options too. There's one PG who stands out for his high RPG numbers for his position. I am interested to see where all these guys get taken!

Laimbeer wrote:wackbone wrote:There are lots of MVPs still on the board, but two in particular stand out. One is a center who doesn't have a great FGA to RPG ratio, and the other is a PG with an even worse ratio, but again he should theoretically have the fewest on the team anyways. Tons of other options too. There's one PG who stands out for his high RPG numbers for his position. I am interested to see where all these guys get taken!
I realize the rebounding angle, but I'm still shocked those two have slid this far.
Snakebites wrote:Laimbeer wrote:wackbone wrote:There are lots of MVPs still on the board, but two in particular stand out. One is a center who doesn't have a great FGA to RPG ratio, and the other is a PG with an even worse ratio, but again he should theoretically have the fewest on the team anyways. Tons of other options too. There's one PG who stands out for his high RPG numbers for his position. I am interested to see where all these guys get taken!
I realize the rebounding angle, but I'm still shocked those two have slid this far.
In fairness, I once won non-rebounding themed game after taking Robinson over the center you speak of.
You know what’s not going to be a thing in this game? Small ball lineups.


Return to Trades and Transactions Games