Texas Draft 2.0 - Discussion

Moderators: Snakebites, MadNESS, Fadeaway_J

durantbird
General Manager
Posts: 9,696
And1: 1,890
Joined: Nov 30, 2019

Re: Texas Draft 2.0 - Discussion 

Post#41 » by durantbird » Thu Dec 11, 2025 8:04 pm

Gilmore isn't a conventional second round pick but his ABA peak is also rarely available. He might have been a more frequent early pick if it was available more
durantbird
General Manager
Posts: 9,696
And1: 1,890
Joined: Nov 30, 2019

Re: Texas Draft 2.0 - Discussion 

Post#42 » by durantbird » Thu Dec 11, 2025 8:08 pm

Left my options to JimmyPlopper
User avatar
Laimbeer
RealGM
Posts: 43,200
And1: 15,203
Joined: Aug 12, 2009
Location: Cabin Creek
     

Re: Texas Draft 2.0 - Discussion 

Post#43 » by Laimbeer » Thu Dec 11, 2025 9:01 pm

parsnips33 wrote:
durantbird wrote:
Laimbeer wrote:McGrady/DRob is a great pairing. I like Paul/Howard as well and it's really cheap.

It's Nash Howard


Which I'm sure he likes even more! :lol:


I like it yep.
Comments to rationalize bad contracts -
1) It's less than the MLE
2) He can be traded later
3) It's only __% of the cap
4) The cap is going up
5) It's only __ years
6) He's a good mentor/locker room guy
User avatar
JimmyPlopper
General Manager
Posts: 7,606
And1: 10,282
Joined: Sep 25, 2020
Location: Donald B's is the place to give me the pace

Re: Texas Draft 2.0 - Signups 

Post#44 » by JimmyPlopper » Thu Dec 11, 2025 11:10 pm

MadNESS wrote:In


Up
Intentions never mattered if they weren't accompanied by effort. Trying mattered, even when it didn’t work.
MadNESS
Forum Mod
Forum Mod
Posts: 21,560
And1: 4,071
Joined: Jun 29, 2008
Location: Wisco
Contact:
     

Re: Texas Draft 2.0 - Signups 

Post#45 » by MadNESS » Thu Dec 11, 2025 11:41 pm

parsnips33 wrote:What the hell I've had enough time off

I'll play


Up
LAKESHOW
parsnips33
General Manager
Posts: 7,622
And1: 3,514
Joined: Sep 01, 2014
 

Re: Texas Draft 2.0 - Discussion 

Post#46 » by parsnips33 » Thu Dec 11, 2025 11:56 pm

Figured I'd go with the proven Nash/Marion combo, and Dwight should fit nicely into that
User avatar
Larry_Russell
RealGM
Posts: 11,908
And1: 6,155
Joined: Jun 23, 2021

Re: Texas Draft 2.0 - Discussion 

Post#47 » by Larry_Russell » Fri Dec 12, 2025 1:52 am

I thought about brunson and lowry

But I really like Porter, cheap, great defemder and shooter and I think pairs better with Robinson ms McGrady
Fadeaway_J
Forum Mod
Forum Mod
Posts: 28,765
And1: 7,704
Joined: Jul 25, 2016
Location: Kingston, Jamaica
   

Re: Texas Draft 2.0 - Discussion 

Post#48 » by Fadeaway_J » Fri Dec 12, 2025 3:41 am

GeorgeMarcus wrote:.

Up again
User avatar
JimmyPlopper
General Manager
Posts: 7,606
And1: 10,282
Joined: Sep 25, 2020
Location: Donald B's is the place to give me the pace

Re: Texas Draft 2.0 - Discussion 

Post#49 » by JimmyPlopper » Fri Dec 12, 2025 6:27 am

George Gervin and Dirk Nowitzki complement each other beautifully because they operate from entirely different parts of the floor—Gervin attacks vertically with floaters, finger rolls, slashes, and movement-based mid-range shots, while Dirk works horizontally with pick-and-pops, high-post face-ups, and perimeter gravity. Their differing geometries force defenses to guard both the rim and the high elbow/arc, creating space, cleaner drives, easier post-ups, and better passing windows for Deron Williams. Gervin, who excelled even without spacing, would thrive with Dirk stretching defenses, while Dirk benefits from a downhill slasher who forces panicked help and opens his lethal pop game. Their usage blends naturally because Dirk is efficient and low-touch while Gervin is a quick decision-maker who doesn’t dominate the ball. With Deron orchestrating, shifting pace, and feeding both scorers, this trio becomes structurally devastating—hard to scheme for, impossible to load up on, and capable of long stretches of elite offensive efficiency.
Intentions never mattered if they weren't accompanied by effort. Trying mattered, even when it didn’t work.
durantbird
General Manager
Posts: 9,696
And1: 1,890
Joined: Nov 30, 2019

Re: Texas Draft 2.0 - Signups 

Post#50 » by durantbird » Fri Dec 12, 2025 9:39 am

Fadeaway_J wrote:In

Up
Fadeaway_J
Forum Mod
Forum Mod
Posts: 28,765
And1: 7,704
Joined: Jul 25, 2016
Location: Kingston, Jamaica
   

Re: Texas Draft 2.0 - Discussion 

Post#51 » by Fadeaway_J » Fri Dec 12, 2025 11:02 am

Man this team feels depressingly paint-by-numbers. :-?
MadNESS
Forum Mod
Forum Mod
Posts: 21,560
And1: 4,071
Joined: Jun 29, 2008
Location: Wisco
Contact:
     

Re: Texas Draft 2.0 - Discussion 

Post#52 » by MadNESS » Fri Dec 12, 2025 11:43 am

Dammit Fade
LAKESHOW
MadNESS
Forum Mod
Forum Mod
Posts: 21,560
And1: 4,071
Joined: Jun 29, 2008
Location: Wisco
Contact:
     

Re: Texas Draft 2.0 - Signups 

Post#53 » by MadNESS » Fri Dec 12, 2025 11:45 am

Mr Ringer wrote:No doubt I'm in


Up
LAKESHOW
Fadeaway_J
Forum Mod
Forum Mod
Posts: 28,765
And1: 7,704
Joined: Jul 25, 2016
Location: Kingston, Jamaica
   

Re: Texas Draft 2.0 - Discussion 

Post#54 » by Fadeaway_J » Fri Dec 12, 2025 12:03 pm

MadNESS wrote:Dammit Fade

Sorry, got bored with the usual Hakeem formula and decided to try something different.
MadNESS
Forum Mod
Forum Mod
Posts: 21,560
And1: 4,071
Joined: Jun 29, 2008
Location: Wisco
Contact:
     

Re: Texas Draft 2.0 - Discussion 

Post#55 » by MadNESS » Fri Dec 12, 2025 12:47 pm

Fadeaway_J wrote:
MadNESS wrote:Dammit Fade

Sorry, got bored with the usual Hakeem formula and decided to try something different.


Was going all euro…. :D
LAKESHOW
durantbird
General Manager
Posts: 9,696
And1: 1,890
Joined: Nov 30, 2019

Re: Texas Draft 2.0 - Discussion 

Post#56 » by durantbird » Fri Dec 12, 2025 3:11 pm

MadNESS wrote:Dammit Fade

Up
durantbird
General Manager
Posts: 9,696
And1: 1,890
Joined: Nov 30, 2019

Re: Texas Draft 2.0 - Signups 

Post#57 » by durantbird » Fri Dec 12, 2025 4:04 pm

Snakebites wrote:Fine. Talked myself into it.

Up
User avatar
Laimbeer
RealGM
Posts: 43,200
And1: 15,203
Joined: Aug 12, 2009
Location: Cabin Creek
     

Re: Texas Draft 2.0 - Discussion 

Post#58 » by Laimbeer » Fri Dec 12, 2025 4:32 pm

I don't think pick and roll as we know it was around in Hayes' day and I read he wasn't a good screen setter. He was an agile low(mostly)-to-mid scorer, rim protector, and athletic for his size. He definitely was a lob threat, so he'd be a good complement even if not off a true pick and roll play. Excellent defender. But he kind of gets the Elgin Baylor treatment here.
Comments to rationalize bad contracts -
1) It's less than the MLE
2) He can be traded later
3) It's only __% of the cap
4) The cap is going up
5) It's only __ years
6) He's a good mentor/locker room guy
User avatar
Dr Positivity
RealGM
Posts: 63,102
And1: 16,470
Joined: Apr 29, 2009
       

Re: Texas Draft 2.0 - Discussion 

Post#59 » by Dr Positivity » Fri Dec 12, 2025 4:37 pm

My comp for Hayes is Jermaine O’Neal if he was the biggest iron man in the league.
It's going to be a glorious day... I feel my luck could change
User avatar
Snakebites
Forum Mod - Pistons
Forum Mod - Pistons
Posts: 51,781
And1: 18,571
Joined: Jul 14, 2002
Location: Looking not-so-happily deranged
   

Re: Texas Draft 2.0 - Discussion 

Post#60 » by Snakebites » Fri Dec 12, 2025 5:14 pm

Laimbeer wrote:I don't think pick and roll as we know it was around in Hayes' day and I read he wasn't a good screen setter. He was an agile low(mostly)-to-mid scorer, rim protector, and athletic for his size. He definitely was a lob threat, so he'd be a good complement even if not off a true pick and roll play. Excellent defender. But he kind of gets the Elgin Baylor treatment here.

You are up.

Return to Trades and Transactions Games