Mascot wrote:simming it on 2k9 worked well last game.
I agree. It is an extremely fair way to go and worked out perfectly last game IMO.
Moderators: Snakebites, MadNESS, Fadeaway_J

Mascot wrote:simming it on 2k9 worked well last game.

 
                                                                                                          DGrangeRx33 wrote:Mascot wrote:BlackIce wrote:
they are gone
Yup, ok give me the wizards. A healthy wizards team, combined with a top 3 pick seems like a good base to work off of.
Someone has the Wizards.

 
                                      
                                                        
               BlackIce wrote:I looked at the list and washington was empty, no email. Thats fine though lets try this again. I'll take the lakers.
tsherkin wrote:The important thing to take away here is that Klomp is wrong.
Esohny wrote:Why are you asking Klomp? "He's" actually a bot that posts random blurbs from a database.
Klomp wrote:I'm putting the tired in retired mod at the moment
BlackIce wrote:DGrangeRx33 wrote:Mascot wrote:
they are gone
Yup, ok give me the wizards. A healthy wizards team, combined with a top 3 pick seems like a good base to work off of.
Someone has the Wizards.
I looked at the list and washington was empty, no email. Thats fine though lets try this again. I'll take the lakers.
 
                                                                                                          Mascot wrote:BlackIce wrote:I didn't participate in the last one, but I'll sign up to this one if I am allowed to. Give me the hornets.
allstar_1264@hotmail.com
they are gone
edit: im sure it said wizards when i posted this first, did you edit it after you posted it? and then i clicked the quote thing and it was changed to hornets? lol
the wizards are gone, new orleans you can have.
 
                                                                                                          skorff26 wrote:I just talked to BlackIce and he wants Detroit.
 
                    
                                                                          
               
 
                                                                                                          Mascot wrote:my bad, but i read your post as Washington, and i even went back to check to see who had them! lol
skorff26 wrote:nba_addict wrote:I will take chicago.
I'll assume that you have the same e-mail address as last game, if not let me know.

nba_addict wrote:Just a suggestion - Why dont we use the actual standings and available lotto simulator instead for the draft order. Realgm and ESPN have their own lotto simulator.

 to the gameplan you laid out.
 to the gameplan you laid out.
nba_addict wrote:skorff26 wrote:nba_addict wrote:I will take chicago.
I'll assume that you have the same e-mail address as last game, if not let me know.
Yes same email address skorff.
Just a suggestion - Why dont we use the actual standings and available lotto simulator instead for the draft order. Realgm and ESPN have their own lotto simulator.
 
                    
                                      
                                                    skorff26 wrote:We have done that in the past but I think most people preferred the sim and then lotto simulator over real life standings.
If someone would prefer the real life standings, send me an e-mail; if I get 3 e-mails of people wanting the real life standings then lotto simulator instead of the sim then lotto simulator; I will open a poll.

 
                    
                                      
                                                    bcortell wrote:I really think we should just start with the draft.. the season is practically over, no need to have a trading period for this year. Wasn't that what the last game was for? (So count me as 1 who wants to draft on real life standings right now.. i.e. without a trading period)


 
                                      
                                                        
               bcortell wrote:I really think we should just start with the draft.. the season is practically over, no need to have a trading period for this year. Wasn't that what the last game was for? (So count me as 1 who wants to draft on real life standings right now.. i.e. without a trading period)
tsherkin wrote:The important thing to take away here is that Klomp is wrong.
Esohny wrote:Why are you asking Klomp? "He's" actually a bot that posts random blurbs from a database.
Klomp wrote:I'm putting the tired in retired mod at the moment
 
                    
                                                                          
               
 
                    
                                      
                                                    Mascot wrote:I see what your saying about Washington but they are the only team in that situation I would think if the draft lottery was held right now.
but by the time June rolls around every team is going to have different rosters. Who's to say that by June Washington wont have LeBron, do they really deserve the #1 pick then?

Return to Trades and Transactions Games