Future Draft Games

Moderators: Snakebites, MadNESS, Fadeaway_J

Zion Wembanyama
RealGM
Posts: 12,583
And1: 3,306
Joined: Mar 31, 2012
         

Re: Future Draft Games 

Post#681 » by Zion Wembanyama » Thu Oct 4, 2018 4:50 pm

8on wrote:
Super Powered wrote:
8on wrote:
edit #3:
1. one MVP, two All-Star
2. two 1st team, two All-Star
3. two 2nd team, six 3rd team
4. one DPOY (only restriction), three All-Defensive (no 1st team or MVP)


- 1 MVP, 1 3rd team, 1 all-Star
- 2 1st team, 2 all-star
- 2 2nd team, 2 3rd team, 3 all-star
- 1 dpoy, 3 all-def, 2 3rd team, 1 all-star


is that better?


Idk, just throwing things against the wall. To truly answer that, I'd need to know which years were using. Please say 60-18...
NBA - Pelicans,Hornets
NFL - Panthers
MLB - Braves
NHL - Ducks, Hurricanes
NCAAB - Tarheels, Wolverines, CHA 49ers
NCAAF - Tarheels, Wolverines, CHA 49ers
Soccer - PSG, CLT FC, USMNT, FRA, SCO
Golf - Tiger Woods
Tennis - Rafael Nadal
NASCAR - Joey Lagano
User avatar
Dr Positivity
RealGM
Posts: 63,016
And1: 16,448
Joined: Apr 29, 2009
       

Re: Future Draft Games 

Post#682 » by Dr Positivity » Thu Oct 4, 2018 4:56 pm

8on wrote:
Dr Positivity wrote:
8on wrote:Slight change:

one MVP, seven no accolades
two All-NBA 1st team, six no All-NBA (All-Star OK)
two All-NBA 2nd team, six All-NBA 3rd team, All-Star, or no accolades
one DPOY, seven All-NBA 3rd team, All-Star, or no accolades


2 all nba 1st and unlimited non all NBA all-stars is definitely stronger than MVP and no accolades to me


edit #3:
1. one MVP, two All-Star
2. two 1st team, two All-Star
3. two 2nd team, six 3rd team
4. one DPOY (only restriction), three All-Defensive (no 1st team or MVP)


That seems closer.
It's going to be a glorious day... I feel my luck could change
User avatar
Laimbeer
RealGM
Posts: 43,130
And1: 15,177
Joined: Aug 12, 2009
Location: Cabin Creek
     

Re: Future Draft Games 

Post#683 » by Laimbeer » Thu Oct 4, 2018 8:20 pm

What about a game where you give up FGAs to draft a player of a certain level? Everyone starts with 85, but you lose some if you draft certain players.

MVP - 15
First Team - 10
Second Team - 7
Third Team - 5
All-Star - 3
Comments to rationalize bad contracts -
1) It's less than the MLE
2) He can be traded later
3) It's only __% of the cap
4) The cap is going up
5) It's only __ years
6) He's a good mentor/locker room guy
Fadeaway_J
Forum Mod
Forum Mod
Posts: 28,698
And1: 7,692
Joined: Jul 25, 2016
Location: Kingston, Jamaica
   

Re: Future Draft Games 

Post#684 » by Fadeaway_J » Sat Oct 6, 2018 3:15 pm

Laimbeer wrote:What about a game where you give up FGAs to draft a player of a certain level? Everyone starts with 85, but you lose some if you draft certain players.

MVP - 15
First Team - 10
Second Team - 7
Third Team - 5
All-Star - 3

So if you draft Shaq for example it would cost you around 35 FGA?

I like the idea although it seems like one where Magic could end up running riot.
User avatar
Laimbeer
RealGM
Posts: 43,130
And1: 15,177
Joined: Aug 12, 2009
Location: Cabin Creek
     

Re: Future Draft Games 

Post#685 » by Laimbeer » Sat Oct 6, 2018 4:32 pm

Fadeaway_J wrote:
Laimbeer wrote:What about a game where you give up FGAs to draft a player of a certain level? Everyone starts with 85, but you lose some if you draft certain players.

MVP - 15
First Team - 10
Second Team - 7
Third Team - 5
All-Star - 3

So if you draft Shaq for example it would cost you around 35 FGA?

I like the idea although it seems like one where Magic could end up running riot.



It favors Magic less then, say, declining percentages. The premium on him is the same as on Mike or Shaq, rather than being based on his original FGAs.
Comments to rationalize bad contracts -
1) It's less than the MLE
2) He can be traded later
3) It's only __% of the cap
4) The cap is going up
5) It's only __ years
6) He's a good mentor/locker room guy
User avatar
Dr Positivity
RealGM
Posts: 63,016
And1: 16,448
Joined: Apr 29, 2009
       

Re: Future Draft Games 

Post#686 » by Dr Positivity » Sat Oct 6, 2018 4:44 pm

Laimbeer wrote:What about a game where you give up FGAs to draft a player of a certain level? Everyone starts with 85, but you lose some if you draft certain players.

MVP - 15
First Team - 10
Second Team - 7
Third Team - 5
All-Star - 3


I like the concept, some expensive teams though even if one goes the lower accolade route. Would something like this be worth considering

MVP: 12
First team: 7
Second team: 4
Third team: 2
All-star: 0

Same margins, the only difference is everything is less expensive vs non all-stars
It's going to be a glorious day... I feel my luck could change
Fadeaway_J
Forum Mod
Forum Mod
Posts: 28,698
And1: 7,692
Joined: Jul 25, 2016
Location: Kingston, Jamaica
   

Re: Future Draft Games 

Post#687 » by Fadeaway_J » Sat Oct 6, 2018 4:51 pm

Laimbeer wrote:
Fadeaway_J wrote:
Laimbeer wrote:What about a game where you give up FGAs to draft a player of a certain level? Everyone starts with 85, but you lose some if you draft certain players.

MVP - 15
First Team - 10
Second Team - 7
Third Team - 5
All-Star - 3

So if you draft Shaq for example it would cost you around 35 FGA?

I like the idea although it seems like one where Magic could end up running riot.



It favors Magic less then, say, declining percentages. The premium on him is the same as on Mike or Shaq, rather than being based on his original FGAs.

Yeah I agree. The alternative would be to assign a total FGA number (say 30 for all MVPs) but that takes away a lot of the individuality of each team.
Fadeaway_J
Forum Mod
Forum Mod
Posts: 28,698
And1: 7,692
Joined: Jul 25, 2016
Location: Kingston, Jamaica
   

Re: Future Draft Games 

Post#688 » by Fadeaway_J » Sat Oct 6, 2018 4:56 pm

Dr Positivity wrote:
Laimbeer wrote:What about a game where you give up FGAs to draft a player of a certain level? Everyone starts with 85, but you lose some if you draft certain players.

MVP - 15
First Team - 10
Second Team - 7
Third Team - 5
All-Star - 3


I like the concept, some expensive teams though even if one goes the lower accolade route. Would something like this be worth considering

MVP: 12
First team: 7
Second team: 4
Third team: 2
All-star: 0

Same margins, the only difference is everything is less expensive vs non all-stars

I prefer these numbers as well.
Fadeaway_J
Forum Mod
Forum Mod
Posts: 28,698
And1: 7,692
Joined: Jul 25, 2016
Location: Kingston, Jamaica
   

Re: Future Draft Games 

Post#689 » by Fadeaway_J » Sat Oct 6, 2018 10:40 pm

Laimbeer wrote:
lilroddyb wrote:What about doing another prediction draft for the upcoming season? and after the season we do playoffs


We really should get this going if we're doing it. Fade did a great job last time. :D


LA Bird wrote:I would be down for a prediction draft. (Putting my name here in case I miss the sign up thread later)

I know we've got another game going, but this one is time sensitive so I'll be doing signups tonight with a view to kicking off by Monday. We don't want it bleeding into the start of the season like last year.
User avatar
Laimbeer
RealGM
Posts: 43,130
And1: 15,177
Joined: Aug 12, 2009
Location: Cabin Creek
     

Re: Future Draft Games 

Post#690 » by Laimbeer » Thu Oct 11, 2018 12:21 am

Fadeaway_J wrote:
Laimbeer wrote:
Fadeaway_J wrote:So if you draft Shaq for example it would cost you around 35 FGA?

I like the idea although it seems like one where Magic could end up running riot.



It favors Magic less then, say, declining percentages. The premium on him is the same as on Mike or Shaq, rather than being based on his original FGAs.

Yeah I agree. The alternative would be to assign a total FGA number (say 30 for all MVPs) but that takes away a lot of the individuality of each team.


That's actually an interesting idea - same cost for all players of a particular level - just add like 15 to that original scale. Thirty for a MVP would generally be a little cheaper than FGA + 15 (most MVPs are above 15 FGAs). Would get us closer to the cost Dr P recommended.
Comments to rationalize bad contracts -
1) It's less than the MLE
2) He can be traded later
3) It's only __% of the cap
4) The cap is going up
5) It's only __ years
6) He's a good mentor/locker room guy
User avatar
Dr Positivity
RealGM
Posts: 63,016
And1: 16,448
Joined: Apr 29, 2009
       

Re: Future Draft Games 

Post#691 » by Dr Positivity » Thu Oct 11, 2018 1:23 am

Laimbeer wrote:That's actually an interesting idea - same cost for all players of a particular level - just add like 15 to that original scale. Thirty for a MVP would generally be a little cheaper than FGA + 15 (most MVPs are above 15 FGAs). Would get us closer to the cost Dr P recommended.


I think MJ is overpowered if he costs the same as other MVPs, same for Tmac and 1st team All-NBAs. I prefer your original idea
It's going to be a glorious day... I feel my luck could change
Fadeaway_J
Forum Mod
Forum Mod
Posts: 28,698
And1: 7,692
Joined: Jul 25, 2016
Location: Kingston, Jamaica
   

Re: Future Draft Games 

Post#692 » by Fadeaway_J » Thu Oct 11, 2018 1:24 am

Laimbeer wrote:
Fadeaway_J wrote:
Laimbeer wrote:

It favors Magic less then, say, declining percentages. The premium on him is the same as on Mike or Shaq, rather than being based on his original FGAs.

Yeah I agree. The alternative would be to assign a total FGA number (say 30 for all MVPs) but that takes away a lot of the individuality of each team.


That's actually an interesting idea - same cost for all players of a particular level - just add like 15 to that original scale. Thirty for a MVP would generally be a little cheaper than FGA + 15 (most MVPs are above 15 FGAs). Would get us closer to the cost Dr P recommended.

I don't know, I'm still leaning more towards the strategic twist of adding FGAs. Everyone paying the exact same price for the same category of player would just make the paths too similar, IMO.
migya
General Manager
Posts: 8,207
And1: 1,518
Joined: Aug 13, 2005

Re: Future Draft Games 

Post#693 » by migya » Thu Oct 11, 2018 3:08 pm

How about something along the lines of what has been talked about recently:

The Accolades cost more draft -
-MVPs cost 5fgas more than their season fga,
-all nba 1st teamers cost 3fgas more,
-2nd teamers cost 2fgas more,
-3rd teamers cost 1fgas more,
-Allstars cost 0.5fgas more

85fga max for team like usual.
User avatar
Laimbeer
RealGM
Posts: 43,130
And1: 15,177
Joined: Aug 12, 2009
Location: Cabin Creek
     

Re: Future Draft Games 

Post#694 » by Laimbeer » Thu Oct 11, 2018 4:00 pm

Fadeaway_J wrote:
Dr Positivity wrote:
Laimbeer wrote:What about a game where you give up FGAs to draft a player of a certain level? Everyone starts with 85, but you lose some if you draft certain players.

MVP - 15
First Team - 10
Second Team - 7
Third Team - 5
All-Star - 3


I like the concept, some expensive teams though even if one goes the lower accolade route. Would something like this be worth considering

MVP: 12
First team: 7
Second team: 4
Third team: 2
All-star: 0

Same margins, the only difference is everything is less expensive vs non all-stars

I prefer these numbers as well.


Scale it down by 20% maybe?

MVP: 12
First team: 8
Second team: 6
Third team: 4
All-star: 2

Really don't like all-stars at zero.
Comments to rationalize bad contracts -
1) It's less than the MLE
2) He can be traded later
3) It's only __% of the cap
4) The cap is going up
5) It's only __ years
6) He's a good mentor/locker room guy
User avatar
Laimbeer
RealGM
Posts: 43,130
And1: 15,177
Joined: Aug 12, 2009
Location: Cabin Creek
     

Re: Future Draft Games 

Post#695 » by Laimbeer » Thu Oct 11, 2018 4:47 pm

Comments to rationalize bad contracts -
1) It's less than the MLE
2) He can be traded later
3) It's only __% of the cap
4) The cap is going up
5) It's only __ years
6) He's a good mentor/locker room guy
Fadeaway_J
Forum Mod
Forum Mod
Posts: 28,698
And1: 7,692
Joined: Jul 25, 2016
Location: Kingston, Jamaica
   

Re: Future Draft Games 

Post#696 » by Fadeaway_J » Thu Oct 11, 2018 6:59 pm

Laimbeer wrote:
Fadeaway_J wrote:
Dr Positivity wrote:
I like the concept, some expensive teams though even if one goes the lower accolade route. Would something like this be worth considering

MVP: 12
First team: 7
Second team: 4
Third team: 2
All-star: 0

Same margins, the only difference is everything is less expensive vs non all-stars

I prefer these numbers as well.


Scale it down by 20% maybe?

MVP: 12
First team: 8
Second team: 6
Third team: 4
All-star: 2

Really don't like all-stars at zero.

Prefer this to the declining by round idea.
euroleague
General Manager
Posts: 8,448
And1: 1,871
Joined: Mar 26, 2014
 

Re: Future Draft Games 

Post#697 » by euroleague » Thu Oct 11, 2018 9:19 pm

Isn’t 7 FGA for 1st team all-NBA a little cheap?
User avatar
Laimbeer
RealGM
Posts: 43,130
And1: 15,177
Joined: Aug 12, 2009
Location: Cabin Creek
     

Re: Future Draft Games 

Post#698 » by Laimbeer » Fri Oct 12, 2018 1:45 pm

euroleague wrote:Isn’t 7 FGA for 1st team all-NBA a little cheap?


It's their FGAs plus a 7 FGA premium - or do you think that's not enough?
Comments to rationalize bad contracts -
1) It's less than the MLE
2) He can be traded later
3) It's only __% of the cap
4) The cap is going up
5) It's only __ years
6) He's a good mentor/locker room guy
User avatar
Laimbeer
RealGM
Posts: 43,130
And1: 15,177
Joined: Aug 12, 2009
Location: Cabin Creek
     

Re: Future Draft Games 

Post#699 » by Laimbeer » Fri Oct 12, 2018 2:17 pm

Fadeaway_J wrote:
Laimbeer wrote:
Fadeaway_J wrote:I prefer these numbers as well.


Scale it down by 20% maybe?

MVP: 12
First team: 8
Second team: 6
Third team: 4
All-star: 2

Really don't like all-stars at zero.

Prefer this to the declining by round idea.


I'll make a signup later today.
Comments to rationalize bad contracts -
1) It's less than the MLE
2) He can be traded later
3) It's only __% of the cap
4) The cap is going up
5) It's only __ years
6) He's a good mentor/locker room guy
User avatar
Dr Positivity
RealGM
Posts: 63,016
And1: 16,448
Joined: Apr 29, 2009
       

Re: Future Draft Games 

Post#700 » by Dr Positivity » Tue Oct 16, 2018 2:34 am

Anyone interested in a relatively unrestricted draft? Might get some sign-ups
It's going to be a glorious day... I feel my luck could change

Return to Trades and Transactions Games