kalenclayton wrote:DocRI wrote:kalenclayton wrote:Whoops.
Sorry about that. We are interested in Stanley Johnson, but are unsure of how we can come up with extra value. What kind of value are you seeking for him? If we can't make a move for him, we are interested in future picks.
First off, no sweat on missing my first post!
I don't really see a way to make up the value difference between a two-spot jump and Stanley Johnson, especially since I already traded Marcus Morris. Is there any salary you want to dump? Are you interested in Ish Smith as a bridge PG to Fox? Any interest in Henry Ellenson? As for picks, I've got my 2018 2nd rounder, a really complicated 2019 2nd rounder (please look it up, it's conditions are too long to type out!), and all of my firsts, but I think a first rounder is too steep a price for moving up two spots and I doubt you're interested in a pick swap, correct? In any case, let me know if any of these dots connect in a way that suits you. Thanks again!
It's pretty normal for a team to include another first when moving up in the draft, especially this high in the draft. We are just talking about two spots, but if your guy is there, it might be in your best interest to move up. It's also a risk on my part because I risk the chance to draft my guy. I'm not trying to talk you into it, but I'm just trying to tell you that this is pretty normal.
Now, about us. Lol
I think the starting point would be sending 10 for 12 and a future first (probably '19). I don't know how you feel about that because it might feel like a bit too much. I just know that it's my starting point.
So just to be clear, there's nothing else on my roster other than Stanley Johnson or a future 1st rounder that'll entice you to trade back, right?
If so, what kind of protection are you willing to accept on a 2019 1st? 'Cuz if I do this, it's gonna need to be steep, and then convert to a pair of 2nds. I'm not talking about Nerlens-Noel-Trade-Level, "This first rounder will absolutely never actually convey" protection, but it's still gonna need to be significant.