Rookie + 1 Sophomore Draft - Discussion Thread
Moderators: Snakebites, MadNESS, Fadeaway_J
Re: Rookie + 1 Sophomore Draft - Discussion Thread
-
- Lead Assistant
- Posts: 4,970
- And1: 1,022
- Joined: Feb 22, 2016
Re: Rookie + 1 Sophomore Draft - Discussion Thread
I'm going to reiterate my previous statement. Thoughts on lowering the required votes to 4? Maybe 3 for the next round? Getting 5 is impossible with only 8 people if the vote is split, and it also required basically 100% voter participation, which is realistically not going to happen. Thoughts?
Greatest Bulls of All Time: 1. TONY SNELL 2. Jordan 3. Pippen 4. Rose 5. Gilmore
Re: Rookie + 1 Sophomore Draft - Discussion Thread
- Dr Positivity
- RealGM
- Posts: 59,792
- And1: 15,522
- Joined: Apr 29, 2009
Re: Rookie + 1 Sophomore Draft - Discussion Thread
I think 3 or 4 is a good idea as well
Re: Rookie + 1 Sophomore Draft - Discussion Thread
-
- Starter
- Posts: 2,139
- And1: 341
- Joined: Aug 26, 2015
Re: Rookie + 1 Sophomore Draft - Discussion Thread
Yeah it really can't be 5 since it allows a situation where neither one gets 5 votes. So does 4 so I'd have 3 votes for win but would be fine with 4
Lähetetty minun LG-M250 laitteesta Tapatalkilla
Lähetetty minun LG-M250 laitteesta Tapatalkilla
Re: Rookie + 1 Sophomore Draft - Discussion Thread
-
- Rookie
- Posts: 1,127
- And1: 296
- Joined: Jun 11, 2013
Re: Rookie + 1 Sophomore Draft - Discussion Thread
Clearly most aren't interested in the voting process and are preoccupied with their own teams.
Re: Rookie + 1 Sophomore Draft - Discussion Thread
-
- Lead Assistant
- Posts: 4,970
- And1: 1,022
- Joined: Feb 22, 2016
Re: Rookie + 1 Sophomore Draft - Discussion Thread
Hooplah wrote:Clearly most aren't interested in the voting process and are preoccupied with their own teams.
I think we've had at least 4 out of a possible 6 votes in all matchups. 66% voter turnout is pretty great for one of these games. 5 votes is just impossible.
Greatest Bulls of All Time: 1. TONY SNELL 2. Jordan 3. Pippen 4. Rose 5. Gilmore
Re: Rookie + 1 Sophomore Draft - Discussion Thread
-
- Rookie
- Posts: 1,127
- And1: 296
- Joined: Jun 11, 2013
Re: Rookie + 1 Sophomore Draft - Discussion Thread
Tony Snell wrote:Hooplah wrote:Clearly most aren't interested in the voting process and are preoccupied with their own teams.
I think we've had at least 4 out of a possible 6 votes in all matchups. 66% voter turnout is pretty great for one of these games. 5 votes is just impossible.
Voting is about par for the course. As difficult as it is to get a vote cast, it's probably about as difficult to get people interested in the process of making the vote. Considering the amount of draft games on here and the length of write ups, time doesn't seem to be an issue, so I figure it's a lack of interest.
Re: Rookie + 1 Sophomore Draft - Discussion Thread
-
- Veteran
- Posts: 2,687
- And1: 643
- Joined: Aug 19, 2015
Re: Rookie + 1 Sophomore Draft - Discussion Thread
Tony Snell wrote:I'm going to reiterate my previous statement. Thoughts on lowering the required votes to 4? Maybe 3 for the next round? Getting 5 is impossible with only 8 people if the vote is split, and it also required basically 100% voter participation, which is realistically not going to happen. Thoughts?
Im thinking of opening up the voting (if not completed after everyone has voted) to Laimbeer , Fadeaway , Snakebites . Would u agree with that
Re: Rookie + 1 Sophomore Draft - Discussion Thread
-
- Rookie
- Posts: 1,127
- And1: 296
- Joined: Jun 11, 2013
Re: Rookie + 1 Sophomore Draft - Discussion Thread
Blazers-1977 wrote:Tony Snell wrote:I'm going to reiterate my previous statement. Thoughts on lowering the required votes to 4? Maybe 3 for the next round? Getting 5 is impossible with only 8 people if the vote is split, and it also required basically 100% voter participation, which is realistically not going to happen. Thoughts?
Im thinking of opening up the voting (if not completed after everyone has voted) to Laimbeer , Fadeaway , Snakebites . Would u agree with that
It's your game open it up to anyone you want to. It can't end unless others vote, so if anyone is willing to vote why not.
Re: Rookie + 1 Sophomore Draft - Discussion Thread
-
- Lead Assistant
- Posts: 4,970
- And1: 1,022
- Joined: Feb 22, 2016
Re: Rookie + 1 Sophomore Draft - Discussion Thread
Blazers-1977 wrote:Tony Snell wrote:I'm going to reiterate my previous statement. Thoughts on lowering the required votes to 4? Maybe 3 for the next round? Getting 5 is impossible with only 8 people if the vote is split, and it also required basically 100% voter participation, which is realistically not going to happen. Thoughts?
Im thinking of opening up the voting (if not completed after everyone has voted) to Laimbeer , Fadeaway , Snakebites . Would u agree with that
Sure. It is your call, but i would support anything to keep the game moving.
Greatest Bulls of All Time: 1. TONY SNELL 2. Jordan 3. Pippen 4. Rose 5. Gilmore
Re: RE: Re: Rookie + 1 Sophomore Draft - Discussion Thread
-
- Starter
- Posts: 2,139
- And1: 341
- Joined: Aug 26, 2015
Re: RE: Re: Rookie + 1 Sophomore Draft - Discussion Thread
I'd still drop it down to 4 votes. It's your callBlazers-1977 wrote:Tony Snell wrote:I'm going to reiterate my previous statement. Thoughts on lowering the required votes to 4? Maybe 3 for the next round? Getting 5 is impossible with only 8 people if the vote is split, and it also required basically 100% voter participation, which is realistically not going to happen. Thoughts?
Im thinking of opening up the voting (if not completed after everyone has voted) to Laimbeer , Fadeaway , Snakebites . Would u agree with that
Lähetetty minun LG-M250 laitteesta Tapatalkilla
Re: Rookie + 1 Sophomore Draft - Discussion Thread
-
- Veteran
- Posts: 2,687
- And1: 643
- Joined: Aug 19, 2015
Re: Rookie + 1 Sophomore Draft - Discussion Thread
Tony Snell wrote:Blazers-1977 wrote:Tony Snell wrote:I'm going to reiterate my previous statement. Thoughts on lowering the required votes to 4? Maybe 3 for the next round? Getting 5 is impossible with only 8 people if the vote is split, and it also required basically 100% voter participation, which is realistically not going to happen. Thoughts?
Im thinking of opening up the voting (if not completed after everyone has voted) to Laimbeer , Fadeaway , Snakebites . Would u agree with that
Sure. It is your call, but i would support anything to keep the game moving.
Im going to open up voting
Re: Rookie + 1 Sophomore Draft - Discussion Thread
-
- General Manager
- Posts: 8,444
- And1: 1,869
- Joined: Mar 26, 2014
Re: Rookie + 1 Sophomore Draft - Discussion Thread
Blazers-1977 wrote:Tony Snell wrote:Blazers-1977 wrote:
Im thinking of opening up the voting (if not completed after everyone has voted) to Laimbeer , Fadeaway , Snakebites . Would u agree with that
Sure. It is your call, but i would support anything to keep the game moving.
Im going to open up voting
open it to everyone. why limit voting to only the players on these drafts, that keeps perspectives to narrow
Re: Rookie + 1 Sophomore Draft - Discussion Thread
-
- Veteran
- Posts: 2,687
- And1: 643
- Joined: Aug 19, 2015
Re: Rookie + 1 Sophomore Draft - Discussion Thread
Alright Im going to make it to 4 votes
Re: Rookie + 1 Sophomore Draft - Discussion Thread
- Dr Positivity
- RealGM
- Posts: 59,792
- And1: 15,522
- Joined: Apr 29, 2009
Re: Rookie + 1 Sophomore Draft - Discussion Thread
I'm willing to go to 3 votes for the final if we want to end the semi
Blazers-1977 wrote:
Return to Trades and Transactions Games