The Pacific Division Draft v2 (80s to now) - Discussion

Post #21 » by **Fadeaway_J** » Mon May 22, 2023 4:38 pm

10th is definitely a good spot - wasn't expecting that pairing to be available.

Post #22 » by **Snakebites** » Mon May 22, 2023 4:45 pm

Fadeaway_J wrote:10th is definitely a good spot - wasn't expecting that pairing to be available.

No disrespect to Kobe but I thought AD had more value and should have been his pick.

I think CP also has more value in a vacuum than Nash, but Nash/AD is a better pair IMO so I won’t be too upset about CP3 being the one to fall.

Still, that pair with the top of round 3 pick is rough.

Fade has been very successful in 2023. That might continue.

wackbone · Post #23 » by **wackbone** » Mon May 22, 2023 5:15 pm

Fadeaway_J wrote:
damecurry wrote:.

Up

Up Dame

Post #24 » by **MadNESS** » Mon May 22, 2023 5:15 pm

wackbone wrote:
Fadeaway_J wrote:
damecurry wrote:.

Up

Up Dame

Up wack

Post #25 » by **Fadeaway_J** » Mon May 22, 2023 7:17 pm

Colbinii wrote:.

Up

Post #26 » by **Fadeaway_J** » Mon May 22, 2023 7:37 pm

Dr Positivity wrote:.

Up

Colbinii · Post #27 » by **Colbinii** » Mon May 22, 2023 8:09 pm

Pretty happy with Barkley/Kawhi. Interesting draft pool.

Post #28 » by **Snakebites** » Mon May 22, 2023 8:38 pm

Man this is getting dicey FAST.

Post #29 » by **Fadeaway_J** » Mon May 22, 2023 9:12 pm

A pox upon the house of flaco

Dr Positivity · Post #30 » by **Dr Positivity** » Mon May 22, 2023 9:19 pm

I was no in mood to end up with someone like the We Believe guy or one of the Kings guys as my starting PG

Post #31 » by **Snakebites** » Mon May 22, 2023 9:34 pm

durantbird wrote:
Larry_Russell wrote:Sorry everyone, thought i added yesterday.

We're only waiting for your ranking. The deadline past but I'll give you some more time.

Up

Larry_Russell · Post #32 » by **Larry_Russell** » Mon May 22, 2023 11:04 pm

Fadeaway_J wrote:
Colbinii wrote:.

Up

Up fade

durantbird · Post #33 » by **durantbird** » Mon May 22, 2023 11:09 pm

I was pretty sure Larry would take the guy I passed on which wasn't the greatest fit with LeBron

Colbinii · Post #34 » by **Colbinii** » Mon May 22, 2023 11:59 pm

Surprised Larry didn't opt for Green over Mitch.

Not a big fan of his fit with CP3/AD but the talent is there and defensive is always a fit.

Post #35 » by **Fadeaway_J** » Tue May 23, 2023 12:00 am

Not a perfect fit but I think Clippers CP3 works well enough with Draymond.

Post #36 » by **Fadeaway_J** » Tue May 23, 2023 12:10 am

Colbinii wrote:Surprised Larry didn't opt for Green over Mitch.

Not a big fan of his fit with CP3/AD but the talent is there and defensive is always a fit.

He won't be doing all the handoff stuff as much but he can still make plays off the short roll for AD. Kinda similar to how CP3's PF with Clippers operated.

I feel like people have gotten away with way wonkier fits for Draymond - I mean I lost to a team with CP3, Draymond, and Grant Hill a couple years ago. :lol:

Colbinii · Post #37 » by **Colbinii** » Tue May 23, 2023 12:11 am

Fadeaway_J wrote:
Colbinii wrote:Surprised Larry didn't opt for Green over Mitch.

Not a big fan of his fit with CP3/AD but the talent is there and defensive is always a fit.

He won't be doing all the handoff stuff as much but he can still make plays off the short roll for AD. Kinda similar to how CP3's PF with Clippers operated.

I feel like people have gotten away with way wonkier fits for Draymond - I mean I lost to a team with CP3, Draymond, and Grant Hill a couple years ago.

I feel like CP3/Draymond would love to play with each other.

wackbone · Post #38 » by **wackbone** » Tue May 23, 2023 12:25 am

Given the Cs in this pool and who I could see potentially fitting with Nash, I MIGHT do something a bit radical. Time will tell.

Post #39 » by **MadNESS** » Tue May 23, 2023 12:28 am

wackbone wrote:Given the Cs in this pool and who I could see potentially fitting with Nash, I MIGHT do something a bit radical. Time will tell.

Up

wackbone · Post #40 » by **wackbone** » Tue May 23, 2023 12:36 am

damecurry wrote:.

Up Dame