82games.com now has 2010-11 stats up

[See5]

Gasol is having a monster season so far but it's kind of hard to compare to him to Kobe in some stats because of the large difference in minutes they're out on the court. Gasol is averaging 37.8mpg versus Kobe's 31.8.

Once the season starts getting in the groove their minutes will become more similar.

[Dekadez]

Lebron is no clutch player guys, just check the clutch statistics. Absolutely no clutch at all, that Lebrick.

[Voice-of-Reason]

http://www.82games.com/1011/1011LAL.HTM

Pau Gasol is the MVP and BEST player of that team, anyone who says otherwise is dumb and should look at the stats presented to you.

well..it would be interesting to see how the ratings match observation.

Do Laker fans think Odom > Barnes > Brown > Artest > Blake > Fisher in terms of impact?

Do Miami fans think Lebron > Wade > Z > Bosh > Arroyo > Jones > Anthony > House > Haslem?

You have to take into account garbage minutes too.

Before looking at the stats and just going based on what I see every night my order would be

Odom > Artest > Brown > Barnes = Blake > Fisher

[Imadogg]

I'm a Lakers fan and yea, so far Gasol has been our best player by far.

Haha wow, look at the on/off stats for the Lakers... Gasol is the only player where if he's off the court, we're in the negatives. Damn.

[Wavy Q]

Pau Gasol PER of 27.8
Kobe PER of 25.1

Looking at all the +/- ratings as well, Pau has Kobe dominated in most statistical categories and efficiency.

Show me 1 time where a great guard had better efficiency than a great big

[Dekadez]

All I can say is that Harangody is an absolute beast!

[Ming Kong!]

These stats are frigging useless.

[raptorforlife88]

These stats are frigging useless.

You wanna provide some reasoning for that? Or are you just going to make worthless blanket statements?

[Alex_De_Large]

Here's one you won't find on there:

Lebron James 20-71(28.2%) outside the paint. Mostly uncontested.

You can lie to us, but can you lie to yourself?

[Vincent 666]

Heat are -1 with Wade on the court.

[Atmanne]

It's so early, one good/bad game will swing these numbers wildly. But they don't help Love's case.

[iamworthy]

These stats are frigging useless.

Love the Sig!!

[Don Draper]

Raw +/- numbers are pretty useless.

Adjusted +/- are better.
http://basketballvalue.com/index.php

It's so early, one good/bad game will swing these numbers wildly. But they don't help Love's case.

+1

[Vinsanity420]

Rashard Lewis

Net points on court per 100 posessions - + 9.8
Net points off court per 100 possessions - + 10.6
Net impact = NEGATIVE .8

5.2 PER at SF, LOL
14.2 PER at PF

Opponent Counterpart Production

13.8 PER at SF
14.8 PER at PF

Negative on/off, Negative Production, Negative Simple Rating, AND WE PAY 20 MILLION FOR THIS? **** YOU LEWIS, **** YOU.

[john2jer]

Let it all out, Vinsanity, you're being far too kind.

[Jazzfan12]

Blake Griffin has a really bad +/-. Worst of anyone on the Clippers. CJ leading the team in +/- even though he isn't playing well because his ball handling allows the Jazz to play better offense.

[daschysta]

Hibbert shows as a massive positive in both adjusted and unadjusted plus minus.

[ahonui06]

DIRK is amazing.

+33.7 NET!

[hironimus]

too small sample size, its been 6 or 7 games ...

[Sleepy51]

IIRC, there used to be a commentary piece on 82games that described the methodology for charting/determining the opponent PER by position data on the player pages. I can't seem to find that article anymore. Does anyone know how they determine who a player's opponent counterpart is on a play by play/minute by minute basis. There are teams that cross matchups and play non-traditional lineups frequently that would seemingly complicate this kind of data.

Anyone know the ins and outs of the player page by position data? Do we already have a thread for this? (My search function is not being helpful)

Thanks