TS% question

Moderator: Doctor MJ

Reservoirdawgs
Starter
Posts: 2,013
And1: 966
Joined: Dec 21, 2004
Location: Stuck in the middle with you.
     

TS% question 

Post#1 » by Reservoirdawgs » Wed Dec 1, 2010 5:31 pm

What is considered average, good, and elite for TS%? Would average be considered around .500?
So when is this plane going down? I'll ride it til' it hits the ground!
Malinhion
Banned User
Posts: 10,071
And1: 3
Joined: Oct 03, 2006
Location: Holding a Players-Only Meeting

Re: TS% question 

Post#2 » by Malinhion » Wed Dec 1, 2010 5:34 pm

1. Depends on the position.

2. No.
User avatar
Ming Kong!
RealGM
Posts: 24,480
And1: 31
Joined: Nov 21, 2002
Location: Jazz fan in Miami, FL.

Re: TS% question 

Post#3 » by Ming Kong! » Wed Dec 1, 2010 5:45 pm

I could never figure out why people are so obsessed with advanced stats. To me it's nice that it's available but I find it so much easier to just use raw stats. In the end of the day you'll never be able to factor in intangibles, true defensive impact, and how much the stats are stat padding versus impacting the outing of the game. Take guys like Sefelosha and Bruce Bowens, all the stats in the world wont be able to measure these guys, while a Zach Randolph looks like a stud if you don't have knowledge of the game, or actually follow the NBA tightly.
User avatar
Sinant
Head Coach
Posts: 7,141
And1: 140
Joined: Aug 24, 2010

Re: TS% question 

Post#4 » by Sinant » Wed Dec 1, 2010 5:50 pm

Hoopdata says the league average TS% is 54.4, however, to determine what's good or not really depends on the position of the player.
User avatar
CellarDoor
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 11,146
And1: 972
Joined: May 11, 2008
         

Re: TS% question 

Post#5 » by CellarDoor » Wed Dec 1, 2010 5:52 pm

TS% is great when you use it as it should be used: as a tool.

Imagine going to BBR and looking a given stat and sorting while not looking at anything else. You'd think some random PF that made the only 3 they attempted all year was the greatest 3pt shooter. You'd think a bench warmer who hit two FTs then got cut was the best FT shooter in the league. You'd think Randolph was a better offensive player than Tim Duncan, etc. The beauty of the statistics is that you can use them in concert with other statistics and hopefully your own eyes to form conclusions.

I'll take a shot at average/good/elite TS though. For perimeter players, good TS is around 56-57% and elite is north of 58%. Average is 53-54% imo. Interior players you're looking north of 60% for elite imo.
tsherkin wrote:You can run away if you like, but I'm not done with this nonsense, I'm going rip apart everything you've said so everyone else here knows that you're completely lacking in basic basketball knowledge...
DSMok1
Sophomore
Posts: 118
And1: 113
Joined: Jul 26, 2010
Location: Maine
Contact:
 

Re: TS% question 

Post#6 » by DSMok1 » Wed Dec 1, 2010 6:23 pm

Ming Kong! wrote:I could never figure out why people are so obsessed with advanced stats. To me it's nice that it's available but I find it so much easier to just use raw stats. In the end of the day you'll never be able to factor in intangibles, true defensive impact, and how much the stats are stat padding versus impacting the outing of the game. Take guys like Sefelosha and Bruce Bowens, all the stats in the world wont be able to measure these guys, while a Zach Randolph looks like a stud if you don't have knowledge of the game, or actually follow the NBA tightly.


By Advanced SPM, Thabo is 3rd on OKC this year and not far short of KD. ASPM is just a weighted combination of stats like TS%. :)
Developer of Box Plus/Minus and VORP

@DSMok1 on Twitter (no longer active)
DSMok1
Sophomore
Posts: 118
And1: 113
Joined: Jul 26, 2010
Location: Maine
Contact:
 

Re: TS% question 

Post#7 » by DSMok1 » Wed Dec 1, 2010 6:26 pm

CellarDoor wrote:
I'll take a shot at average/good/elite TS though. For perimeter players, good TS is around 56-57% and elite is north of 58%. Average is 53-54% imo. Interior players you're looking north of 60% for elite imo.


I don't think you should go by position in evaluating "good" TS%, but rather by the player's usage% (adjusted for TO%). A post w/ 20% USG and 55% TS% is about the same as a PG with the same numbers.
Developer of Box Plus/Minus and VORP

@DSMok1 on Twitter (no longer active)

Return to Statistical Analysis