Ringer's Top 100 NBA Players

[AFM]

Apologies if this was discussed in another thread but I found this list interesting and sure to spark some debate:

https://nbarankings.theringer.com/

They have 3 Wizards in the top 100:

-Beal @ 36
-Porzingis @ 53
-Kuzma @ 82

I'm a little surprised to see Davis at number 8 especially since they seem to factor reliability into their rankings.

[nate33]

Lebron is WAY too high. The guy is posting a below-average TS% of .558 and takes a ton of plays off on defense. At this point, he's basically a rich man's Kyle Kuzma - a borderline All-Star player but no longer in the top 15.

The rest of the list is pretty good. I'd move Mikal Bridges up a bit and Trae Young down a bit,

[payitforward]

Well, they aren't going to be wrong about Jokic or Giannis or Steph, are they? But, in a zillion ways this set of rankings, overall, seems way way off to me.

On the one hand, as most such tend to be, it's a legacy listing -- LeBron so high, for example (as has been pointed out).
On the other hand, I don't see how they can possibly list Jimmy Butler so low.

For that matter, no, Jayson Tatum is not the 6th best player in the game (or the 16th: is he really even the 26th?). He's not as good as Tyrese Haliburton. & that's no insult, btw, as I don't think there are 5 players in the game right now who are on a tier with Tyrese Halliburton!

SG-A is a much better player than Devin Booker. Chris Paul is still one of the top players in the league.

In all, it's pretty awful.

[keynote]

These sorts of lists don't strive for accuracy; they strive for virality.

Sent from my Pixel 6 Pro using RealGM mobile app

[DCZards]

Kyrie at 66? Really? He at least has to be a top 50 NBA player…even with his piss poor D and off court issues.

[montestewart]

Kyrie at 66? Really? He at least has to be a top 50 NBA player…even with his piss poor D and off court issues.

Playing 124 games in four years with Brooklyn probably factored into the rating.