ImageImageImageImageImage

Javaris Crittenton

Moderators: montestewart, LyricalRico, nate33

User avatar
MJG
Assistant Coach
Posts: 4,403
And1: 151
Joined: Aug 14, 2004
Location: Northern Virginia

Re: Javaris Crittenton 

Post#41 » by MJG » Tue Dec 1, 2009 9:13 pm

jholmbe1 wrote:
Dat2U wrote:
hands11 wrote:Orlando is in for 74M next year. That would be a 40M cap hit DAME
http://hoopshype.com/salaries/orlando.htm


It's DAMN! DAMN! DAMN! WTF is DAME? I've read DAME for two **** years and I kept thinking it was a **** mistype, but every single **** time I read your posts I see a GAWDDAMN DAME!

:evil:


haha, that seems to enrage you as much as people spelling "lose" as "loose" or "losing" as "loosing" annoys me. Also, sooooo many people misspell this, is it really that hard? Just pronounce the word and you will see how stupid it sounds to get the spelling wrong.

I'll second you there. "Lose" versus "Loose" is high on my personal annoyance meter. I generally roll with these types of misspellings - I learned awhile ago that being a vocal grammar/spelling nazi isn't an especially endearing quality - but this one still bugs me when I see it.
LyricalRico
Forum Mod - Wizards
Forum Mod - Wizards
Posts: 30,560
And1: 851
Joined: May 23, 2002
Location: Back into the fray!
Contact:
       

Re: Javaris Crittenton 

Post#42 » by LyricalRico » Tue Dec 1, 2009 9:14 pm

I still say that nothing is as bad as "defence".

:nonono:

But getting back to the subject of the thread, if Critt comes back healthy some time soon and can at least distributed+defend, that could really make Foye expendable. Miller, Young, and Gil would take up all the SG minutes with Gil, Boykins, and Critt playing PG.
User avatar
bulletproof_32
Sixth Man
Posts: 1,597
And1: 42
Joined: Oct 25, 2005
 

Re: Javaris Crittenton 

Post#43 » by bulletproof_32 » Tue Dec 1, 2009 10:19 pm

Eye four won, don't really take offence to misspelled/ used words. I'm sure were all guilty of it and Eye no I do it allot of times. Butt I must say that "DAME" is pretty rediciulously funny too me.
User avatar
doclinkin
RealGM
Posts: 14,948
And1: 6,718
Joined: Jul 26, 2004
Location: .wizuds.

Re: Javaris Crittenton 

Post#44 » by doclinkin » Tue Dec 1, 2009 11:28 pm

jholmbe1 wrote:
Dat2U wrote:It's DAMN! DAMN! DAMN! WTF is DAME? I've read DAME for two **** years and I kept thinking it was a **** mistype, but every single **** time I read your posts I see a GAWDDAMN DAME!

:evil:


haha, that seems to enrage you as much as people spelling "lose" as "loose" or "losing" as "loosing" annoys me. Also, sooooo many people misspell this, is it really that hard? Just pronounce the word and you will see how stupid it sounds to get the spelling wrong.


See now that's where you're wrong.

English being a hodgepodge mutt of a language we have more exceptions than we have rules, but there's no visual clue whatsoever to discern between the two. Why should 'not-win' be pronounced 'looze' and 'not-tight' be pronounced 'luce'? The only difference in pronunciation is whether the 's' is sounded as a 'z'. And for those who are shaky spellers, aural more than visual users of the language, the word 'lose' tends to violate one of the general trends. It truly looks like it should be pronounced 'lows', or at least in general the silent 'e' after the consonant tends to indicate that we use a long 'o' sound.

The DAME thing is silly though, a fruity irony. In an attempt to be one of the boys, it tugs on a garter belt and sashays in a big poofy dress. Vernacular swagger transexed to doilies and hankies.

Understood it's a byproduct of that shaky speller running his argument through the spell-check so that the argument won't be dismissed as ig'nant. But grammar engines not being prescient, it chokes on 'damm' and coughs up -- well -- a tony british lady, overly fat, with haughty and pretentious airs. Just kinda funny. Thus weakening the argument and more likely to be dismissed. But true irony is rare, even when accidental. Seems to me y'might as well treasure it when you stumble upon it. It's hilarious. And it ain't your DAME business anyway.
User avatar
MJG
Assistant Coach
Posts: 4,403
And1: 151
Joined: Aug 14, 2004
Location: Northern Virginia

Re: Javaris Crittenton 

Post#45 » by MJG » Tue Dec 1, 2009 11:52 pm

Ha let's hope that Crittenton doesn't pull a Dixon and read his thread on this board. It can't be much of a confidence booster to see it turn into a discussion of grammatical pet peeves.
closg00
RealGM
Posts: 24,431
And1: 4,435
Joined: Nov 21, 2004

Re: Javaris Crittenton 

Post#46 » by closg00 » Tue Dec 22, 2009 6:33 pm

Looks like Crit is done for the season. Good-luck in FA Crit.

Javaris Crittenton has not made much progress on his injured left foot, which has sidelined him since training camp, and said that he plans to get a second opinion. He appeared despondent after the Wizards beat Golden State on Friday, claiming that he still had more pain in his foot after participating in some light practice drills on the West Coast trip. Crittenton had surgery on his foot in late October and had hoped to be participating in full practices at this point.
User avatar
nate33
Forum Mod - Wizards
Forum Mod - Wizards
Posts: 70,077
And1: 22,488
Joined: Oct 28, 2002

Re: Javaris Crittenton 

Post#47 » by nate33 » Tue Dec 22, 2009 7:38 pm

closg00 wrote:Looks like Crit is done for the season. Good-luck in FA Crit.

Javaris Crittenton has not made much progress on his injured left foot, which has sidelined him since training camp, and said that he plans to get a second opinion. He appeared despondent after the Wizards beat Golden State on Friday, claiming that he still had more pain in his foot after participating in some light practice drills on the West Coast trip. Crittenton had surgery on his foot in late October and had hoped to be participating in full practices at this point.

That's really too bad.

It was beginning to look like Crittenton was actually going to get a shot here since Foye has been a failure at PG. Crittenton only had to beat out Boykins - and the bloom is already off the rose with Boykins.
User avatar
MJG
Assistant Coach
Posts: 4,403
And1: 151
Joined: Aug 14, 2004
Location: Northern Virginia

Re: Javaris Crittenton 

Post#48 » by MJG » Tue Dec 22, 2009 8:34 pm

It sounds a little silly, but I actually was slightly looking forward to his comeback. In a season that's been much more down than up, and looks like it'll continue along that path, the return of a young player at a position of need would have provided a nice glimmer of interest. Sure, odds are that he would've wound up playing a few token four minute games and not really doing anything with them, but it still would be more interesting than him just not playing at all.
hands11
Banned User
Posts: 31,171
And1: 2,444
Joined: May 16, 2005

Re: Javaris Crittenton 

Post#49 » by hands11 » Fri Dec 25, 2009 3:47 pm

I'm not giving up on the Critter just yet. While I like Boyk, I still want to see other options.

As for the spelling thing, if it bothers you that much...see a doctor. You need professional attention. If you want to get upset about something, find a worthy topic. Maybe people who curse to much..specially around kids. Or people that smoke with kids in the car. Personally, I hate people who drive to close to other vehiculars... specially in the snow or rain. In general, I don't like rude people.

But if you think pointing out peoples bad spelling in a angry tone does anything more than make you look simple minded and unbalanced then you sadly mistaken. A simple.. hey Hands...FYI it's spelled damn not dame would have been effective and a classier move.

I usually do something that is a least phonetically correct. But even that can cause problems since that would require one hearing the word pronounced correctly.

For example. Restaurant.
[French, restorative soup, restaurant, from present participle of restaurer, to restore, from Old French restorer; see restore.]
[from French, from restaurer to restore]

Interesting in deed. I just learned something new. Anyway. Most pronounce this .. restront or resteront, restaront. Well, unless your from the South or from the country then it ... restrant or resterant. But a French person would pronounce it as it's spelled. Res-ta-urant

I believe people who took Latin and other foreign languages probably have a leg up. Thank God for spell check. Even though it doesn't help with everything..than or then.. or damn/dam/dame, it does catch a lot.

As for Dame. Yeah, that one didn't make much sense. Not sure what had me typing it like that. Probably because I know dam wasn't correct. Spelling it damn wouldn't have been my first guess. Damn pronounced dam. Hmm. I have more of a silver tongue then a silver pen. But I'm still willing to learn the writing part.

As for the spoken word, I have noticed the evolution of the double word. You know... It's not big....it's big big. Well, this seems to have indirectly influenced people into saying doodoo. Listen.. you'll hear it. You probably do it yourself. People usually don't believe they say it until I point it out. It goes something like this. They will say, " I think I do do that. " I believe this was born of the double emphasis phenomenon. It wasn't deep, it was deep deep. Its become so prevalent that when I point it out and ask them to try saying the sentence without the doodoo they can't think of how to do it. So I ask, well how would you write that it? You would just say, I think I do that. Personally, I find people speaking incorrectly more of a problem.

Ok, back to damn.

Damn
Etymology: Middle English dampnen, from Anglo-French dampner, from Latin damnare, from damnum damage, loss, fine
Date: 13th century

Ok, now I can see where the "n" comes from.

For fun, I looked up dame. But I don't think most people understand what dame really means.

dame (dm)
n.
1. Used formerly as a courtesy title for a woman in authority or a mistress of a household.
2.
a. A married woman; a matron.
b. An elderly woman.
3. Slang A woman.
4. Chiefly British
a. A woman holding a nonhereditary title conferred by a sovereign in recognition of personal merit or service to the country.
b. The wife or widow of a knight.
c. Used as the title for such a woman.
[Middle English, from Old French, from Latin domina, feminine of dominus, lord, master; see dem- in Indo-European roots.]

Ok, I think I have my arms around this damn thing.


Merry Christmas. Happy Holidays to other. And a happy new year to all.
User avatar
willbcocks
Analyst
Posts: 3,629
And1: 278
Joined: Mar 17, 2003
Location: Wall-E has come to save Washington!

Re: Javaris Crittenton 

Post#50 » by willbcocks » Fri Dec 25, 2009 4:36 pm

LyricalRico wrote:I still say that nothing is as bad as "defence".

:nonono:


Don't loose too much sleep over "defence." It's not even incorrect in most English-speaking countries...

Hands: FYI: "indeed" not "in deed." The latter could be used in a sentence like "in word as in deed," but that's a totally different meaning.

Return to Washington Wizards