llcc25 wrote:I've seen enough through 30 games that although it may seem likes he's progressing given his stats, that's fools gold...He may put up 24 and 6 assists, which any pg would like, but if you factor in his fg %, turnovers, pourous defense, and individual play down the stretch (forced jump shots, not getting others involved, etc.)., we're better off without him...
See, I don't see Gil this way at all. First off, he's not the only one taking bad shots but he does seem to be the only one making nice passes most of the time. Second, if he had his explosion back 100% and was getting calls from the refs like he should, he wouldn't be taking as many jumpers in the 4th. Third, you can't get others involved if they aren't running the same offense you are. If Butler's not in the right spot or Jamison is hanging out at the 3pt line instead of banging in the paint, that's not Gil's fault.
And the part I find funny is that if the guy is such a net negative, why would you then turn around and say that he would make another team a contender? That doesn't make sense. Either the guy can help a team win or he can't. And if he can, then we need to put the right kinds of players around him to maximize his value - not dump him for peanuts.