+1 Monte. Blatch is just a different player at PF than C. He can use his length better, and he's still quick enough to get around most PFs.
If tend to think that Blatche is destined for a KG-lite line: 20/11/4 with decent teammates. And you know what? That's freaking fantastic.
Uhm, I guess this is the Nets game thread, pretty much, no?
Moderators: montestewart, LyricalRico, nate33
Re: Uhm, I guess this is the Nets game thread, pretty much, no?
- Illuminaire
- Veteran
- Posts: 2,970
- And1: 606
- Joined: Jan 04, 2010
-
Re: Uhm, I guess this is the Nets game thread, pretty much, no?
-
- Banned User
- Posts: 31,171
- And1: 2,444
- Joined: May 16, 2005
Re: Uhm, I guess this is the Nets game thread, pretty much, no?
Illuminaire wrote:+1 Monte. Blatch is just a different player at PF than C. He can use his length better, and he's still quick enough to get around most PFs.
If tend to think that Blatche is destined for a KG-lite line: 20/11/4 with decent teammates. And you know what? That's freaking fantastic.
Those are KGs 4th year numbers after many many starts and minutes.
Not exactly KG lite.
KG would have already started 250 games with associated minutes and was their primary focus the whole time I believe. Dray has started like 72 games with limited minutes.
I don't want to get to ahead of myself since Drays sample size with high production is small but....it makes you wonder.
But I'm happy Dray had a chance to mess up and get his head on straight and turn into 7DD.
Dray had a longer road to travel maturity wise.