
Do you really not realize that winning more games makes it more likely that EG will keep his job?
Moderators: montestewart, LyricalRico, nate33
tontoz wrote:TheBabyMaker wrote:tontoz wrote:This team hasn't won over 45 games since the 70s. That is the real problem. It isn't just about the last 4 years.
30 wins should never be a goal.
30 wins should not be a goal but, tanking games and praying to get the top pick shoud not be a goal eighter (its not like there is a Lebron or Kobe in the draft every year). I just don't get the losing mentality of this board (tanking and losing on purpose) maybe thats what the problem with this organizating, just a losing mentality and environment with fans accepting it year after year, why even bother to play the game if you want to lose. You can't only win through the draft, you need free agents too but who would want to play here (any good free agent) in this constant losing environment. No wonder I don't bother to post here often I get tired of reading this crap.
Tanking isn't a goal, it is a means to an end.
This team is over the cap so it doesn't matter whether free agents want to play here or not. How exactly do you propose bringing in the talent to make this team a good one?
The mentality of the fans isn't going to cause the team to lose games year after year. Lack of talent is what causes that.
TheBabyMaker wrote:Means to an end of what, winning, ( or you mean losing)we have been doing that for years. Seriously I just don't get it. But keep playing the lottery and hope to hit the jackpot, not much is going to change unless management changes and get a decent Coatching and trainer staff.
tontoz wrote:^^ So the past doesn't matter unless it suits your argument, right?
Do you really not realize that winning more games makes it more likely that EG will keep his job?
payitforward wrote:tontoz wrote:^^ So the past doesn't matter unless it suits your argument, right?
Do you really not realize that winning more games makes it more likely that EG will keep his job?
Unfortunately, I am completely unable to figure out what would actually lead to EG being fired! But, surely "tanking" (i.e. losing more or less on purpose) wouldn't do it. It'd be another case of Ernie following Ted's "strategy."
You tell me how a GM who has averaged less than 30 wins for a decade still has a job?
tontoz wrote:
The whole point of the Okariza deal was to help the team win more games in the short term and try to make the playoffs. That failed and a big reason why it failed is all the mistakes EG made leading up to the Okariza deal.
Ted hasn't been the owner for a decade so is probably excusing some of what happened under Abe. However it remains to be seen how long he is going to listen to EG's excuses. EG only has 1 year left on his deal.
Last year the team finished with 6 straight wins. What has been the long term benefit of those wins? There certainly wasn't any carryover to this season.
DCZards wrote:C'mon, tontoz, you know the big reason the Zards aren't going to make the playoffs is because Wall missed the first two months of the season. It's also the main reason there was no carryover from the end of last sason. This IS a playoff team when Wall is healthy. EG was right about that.
Isn't there some benefits in a team developing a winning--rather than losing--mindset, even if they're not going to win 50 games? Isn't there some benefit to having young players like Beal and Wall experience what it's like to win more often than not?