ImageImageImageImageImage

GT #63: Bucks @ Wizards 7 PM CSN

Moderators: montestewart, LyricalRico, nate33

User avatar
tontoz
RealGM
Posts: 20,252
And1: 5,029
Joined: Apr 11, 2005

Re: GT #63: Bucks @ Wizards 7 PM CSN 

Post#101 » by tontoz » Fri Mar 15, 2013 3:18 am

^^ So the past doesn't matter unless it suits your argument, right? :roll:

Do you really not realize that winning more games makes it more likely that EG will keep his job?
"bulky agile perimeter bone crunch pick setting draymond green" WizD
TheBabyMaker
Starter
Posts: 2,130
And1: 852
Joined: Apr 01, 2009
Location: Truth or Consequences, NM
     

Re: GT #63: Bucks @ Wizards 7 PM CSN 

Post#102 » by TheBabyMaker » Fri Mar 15, 2013 5:20 am

tontoz wrote:
TheBabyMaker wrote:
tontoz wrote:This team hasn't won over 45 games since the 70s. That is the real problem. It isn't just about the last 4 years.

30 wins should never be a goal.


30 wins should not be a goal but, tanking games and praying to get the top pick shoud not be a goal eighter (its not like there is a Lebron or Kobe in the draft every year). I just don't get the losing mentality of this board (tanking and losing on purpose) maybe thats what the problem with this organizating, just a losing mentality and environment with fans accepting it year after year, why even bother to play the game if you want to lose. You can't only win through the draft, you need free agents too but who would want to play here (any good free agent) in this constant losing environment. No wonder I don't bother to post here often I get tired of reading this crap. :roll:



Tanking isn't a goal, it is a means to an end.

This team is over the cap so it doesn't matter whether free agents want to play here or not. How exactly do you propose bringing in the talent to make this team a good one?

The mentality of the fans isn't going to cause the team to lose games year after year. Lack of talent is what causes that.


Means to an end of what, winning, ( or you mean losing) :lol: we have been doing that for years. Seriously I just don't get it. But keep playing the lottery and hope to hit the jackpot, not much is going to change unless management changes and get a decent Coatching and trainer staff.
nuposse04
RealGM
Posts: 11,298
And1: 2,440
Joined: Jul 20, 2004
Location: on a rock
   

Re: GT #63: Bucks @ Wizards 7 PM CSN 

Post#103 » by nuposse04 » Fri Mar 15, 2013 5:59 am

Whats the point of tanking if EG is drafting...if the tanking is the means here, its just going to lead to a soul crushing end anyways with that cum dumpster drafting for us.
User avatar
tontoz
RealGM
Posts: 20,252
And1: 5,029
Joined: Apr 11, 2005

Re: GT #63: Bucks @ Wizards 7 PM CSN 

Post#104 » by tontoz » Fri Mar 15, 2013 11:16 am

TheBabyMaker wrote:Means to an end of what, winning, ( or you mean losing) :lol: we have been doing that for years. Seriously I just don't get it. But keep playing the lottery and hope to hit the jackpot, not much is going to change unless management changes and get a decent Coatching and trainer staff.



If those 6 straight wins at the end of last season had cost us the chance to draft Beal then i think you would get it. The goal is to be a regular 50+ win team. Winning a handful more games this year does nothing to help accomplish that goal.

Losing now not only improves our draft position/lottery odds but also makes it more likely that EG gets canned.
"bulky agile perimeter bone crunch pick setting draymond green" WizD
Ruzious
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 47,909
And1: 11,582
Joined: Jul 17, 2001
       

Re: GT #63: Bucks @ Wizards 7 PM CSN 

Post#105 » by Ruzious » Fri Mar 15, 2013 11:41 am

In the grand scheme of things, would you rather win 32 games because you played a beat up Nene 34 minutes a game (while icing his shoulder and foot on the sidelines when he's not playing). or would you rather sit him, let him heal, give that time to Seraphin and Vesely, and lose a few more games enabling the team to get a better player in the draft and reducing the chance that we end up with another Vesely?
"A common mistake that people make when trying to design something completely foolproof is to underestimate the ingenuity of complete fools." - Douglas Adams
payitforward
RealGM
Posts: 24,534
And1: 9,066
Joined: May 02, 2012
Location: On the Atlantic

Re: GT #63: Bucks @ Wizards 7 PM CSN 

Post#106 » by payitforward » Fri Mar 15, 2013 12:10 pm

tontoz wrote:^^ So the past doesn't matter unless it suits your argument, right? :roll:

Do you really not realize that winning more games makes it more likely that EG will keep his job?

Unfortunately, I am completely unable to figure out what would actually lead to EG being fired! But, surely "tanking" (i.e. losing more or less on purpose) wouldn't do it. It'd be another case of Ernie following Ted's "strategy."

You tell me how a GM who has averaged less than 30 wins for a decade still has a job?
User avatar
tontoz
RealGM
Posts: 20,252
And1: 5,029
Joined: Apr 11, 2005

Re: GT #63: Bucks @ Wizards 7 PM CSN 

Post#107 » by tontoz » Fri Mar 15, 2013 12:28 pm

payitforward wrote:
tontoz wrote:^^ So the past doesn't matter unless it suits your argument, right? :roll:

Do you really not realize that winning more games makes it more likely that EG will keep his job?

Unfortunately, I am completely unable to figure out what would actually lead to EG being fired! But, surely "tanking" (i.e. losing more or less on purpose) wouldn't do it. It'd be another case of Ernie following Ted's "strategy."

You tell me how a GM who has averaged less than 30 wins for a decade still has a job?



The whole point of the Okariza deal was to help the team win more games in the short term and try to make the playoffs. That failed and a big reason why it failed is all the mistakes EG made leading up to the Okariza deal.

Ted hasn't been the owner for a decade so is probably excusing some of what happened under Abe. However it remains to be seen how long he is going to listen to EG's excuses. EG only has 1 year left on his deal.

Last year the team finished with 6 straight wins. What has been the long term benefit of those wins? There certainly wasn't any carryover to this season.
"bulky agile perimeter bone crunch pick setting draymond green" WizD
DCZards
RealGM
Posts: 11,114
And1: 4,968
Joined: Jul 16, 2005
Location: The Streets of DC
     

Re: GT #63: Bucks @ Wizards 7 PM CSN 

Post#108 » by DCZards » Fri Mar 15, 2013 1:03 pm

tontoz wrote:

The whole point of the Okariza deal was to help the team win more games in the short term and try to make the playoffs. That failed and a big reason why it failed is all the mistakes EG made leading up to the Okariza deal.

Ted hasn't been the owner for a decade so is probably excusing some of what happened under Abe. However it remains to be seen how long he is going to listen to EG's excuses. EG only has 1 year left on his deal.

Last year the team finished with 6 straight wins. What has been the long term benefit of those wins? There certainly wasn't any carryover to this season.


C'mon, tontoz, you know the big reason the Zards aren't going to make the playoffs is because Wall missed the first two months of the season. It's also the main reason there was no carryover from the end of last sason. This IS a playoff team when Wall is healthy. EG was right about that.

If I understand you correctly, the best thing the Zards can do is have the worst record in the NBA.

Isn't there some benefits in a team developing a winning--rather than losing--mindset, even if they're not going to win 50 games? Isn't there some benefit to having young players like Beal and Wall experience what it's like to win more often than not?

Yes, only winning 35 games sucks--and is not acceptable. But it's easier to build on growth, improvement and wins than it is to build on a losing mentality. Trying to keep your win total low with the thought that one or two draft picks are going to take you from a 25-30 win team to a 50 win team the next season is downright foolish. I know that's not exactly what you're saying but that's what it sounds like.
User avatar
tontoz
RealGM
Posts: 20,252
And1: 5,029
Joined: Apr 11, 2005

Re: GT #63: Bucks @ Wizards 7 PM CSN 

Post#109 » by tontoz » Fri Mar 15, 2013 1:10 pm

DCZards wrote:C'mon, tontoz, you know the big reason the Zards aren't going to make the playoffs is because Wall missed the first two months of the season. It's also the main reason there was no carryover from the end of last sason. This IS a playoff team when Wall is healthy. EG was right about that.




Wall being out two months is one of the reasons they aren't going to make the playoffs. However the biggest reason is that there are too many players on the roster who suck. If any of the top 7 players are hurt it is a big blow because their replacements are so bad.

Even when everyone is healthy this is a weak offensive team. When key guys are out it is an awful offensive team.

Very few teams stay healthy all year.

Isn't there some benefits in a team developing a winning--rather than losing--mindset, even if they're not going to win 50 games? Isn't there some benefit to having young players like Beal and Wall experience what it's like to win more often than not?



Yes, but it is too late in the game for this to be anything but a lousy season. A few extra wins will be like whipped cream on a turd. It might look a little better but it is still a turd.
"bulky agile perimeter bone crunch pick setting draymond green" WizD
truwizfan4evr
Assistant Coach
Posts: 3,924
And1: 642
Joined: Jul 07, 2008
Location: tanking
 

Re: GT #63: Bucks @ Wizards 7 PM CSN 

Post#110 » by truwizfan4evr » Sun Mar 17, 2013 1:43 am

I'm a guy who want us to tank but this is so refreshing to see us playing well like this.
You Shouldn't Play For Money, But You Should Play Because You Have A Passion For It -- Bradley Beal
truwizfan4evr
Assistant Coach
Posts: 3,924
And1: 642
Joined: Jul 07, 2008
Location: tanking
 

Re: GT #63: Bucks @ Wizards 7 PM CSN 

Post#111 » by truwizfan4evr » Sun Mar 17, 2013 4:05 am

You Shouldn't Play For Money, But You Should Play Because You Have A Passion For It -- Bradley Beal

Return to Washington Wizards