ImageImageImageImageImage

You've seen enough: To Beal or not to Beal? (Poll)

Moderators: LyricalRico, nate33, montestewart

What should the Wizards do with Bradley Beal?

Offer the max right away
4
5%
Negotiate and match any offer
19
26%
Negotiate but don't match too high an offer
30
41%
Let him walk, sign and trade if possible
20
27%
 
Total votes: 73

Dat2U
RealGM
Posts: 24,142
And1: 7,903
Joined: Jun 23, 2001
Location: Columbus, OH
       

Re: You've seen enough: To Beal or not to Beal? (Poll) 

Post#161 » by Dat2U » Tue Jun 7, 2016 12:00 am

I'd be a very happy man if we could get one of these packages for Beal.

Philadelphia. Nerlens Noel & Robert Covington
Boston. Avery Bradley & Kelly Olynyk
New York. Carmelo Anthony
Charlotte. Cody Zeller or Frank Kaminsky & Jeremy Lamb
Cleveland. Kevin Love (I would have no problem expanding it to a Beal/Kieff for Love/Shump swap as Lyrical mentioned)

Other offers I'd consider:

Dallas. Wesley Matthews & 2017 1st round pick
Sacramento. Willie Cauley Stein, Omri Casspi & Ben McLemore
Denver. Jusuf Nurkic & Gary Harris
LyricalRico
Forum Mod - Wizards
Forum Mod - Wizards
Posts: 30,562
And1: 853
Joined: May 23, 2002
Location: Back into the fray!
Contact:
       

Re: You've seen enough: To Beal or not to Beal? (Poll) 

Post#162 » by LyricalRico » Tue Jun 7, 2016 6:09 pm

Dat2U wrote:I'd be a very happy man if we could get one of these packages for Beal.

Philadelphia. Nerlens Noel & Robert Covington
Boston. Avery Bradley & Kelly Olynyk
New York. Carmelo Anthony
Charlotte. Cody Zeller or Frank Kaminsky & Jeremy Lamb
Cleveland. Kevin Love (I would have no problem expanding it to a Beal/Kieff for Love/Shump swap as Lyrical mentioned)

Other offers I'd consider:

Dallas. Wesley Matthews & 2017 1st round pick
Sacramento. Willie Cauley Stein, Omri Casspi & Ben McLemore
Denver. Jusuf Nurkic & Gary Harris


Whoa, a Melo shout-out. Nice! For a while he was my Plan B if KD2DC doesn't happen. I've been exploring other things more recently, but I still wouldn't be opposed to it. Especially considering he and Beal will be making nearly the same amount.

Also, if I was ordering the list, I might move the Sacto package up into the "happy" section and the Charlotte package down to the "consider" section.
User avatar
daSwami
Assistant Coach
Posts: 4,284
And1: 563
Joined: Jun 14, 2002
Location: Charlottesville
         

Re: You've seen enough: To Beal or not to Beal? (Poll) 

Post#163 » by daSwami » Tue Jun 7, 2016 6:32 pm

#4
:banghead:
payitforward
RealGM
Posts: 24,554
And1: 9,075
Joined: May 02, 2012
Location: On the Atlantic

Re: You've seen enough: To Beal or not to Beal? (Poll) 

Post#164 » by payitforward » Tue Jun 7, 2016 7:23 pm

I wish I'd remember to track the first Melo sighting in the yearly off season thread. Somehow it seems like the older he gets and the more he declines the earlier his name comes up. I can't imagine a worse salary to take on. I'd rather max Beal than trade him straight up for Melo.

The rest of those deals, I'm struggling to see teams go for, although, like LR, I really like the Sac'to deal -- except substitute either Quincy Acy or Seth Curry (both?? :) ) for Ben McLemore. I also like the Denver deal, even though Nurkic hasn't done anything yet.
Ruzious
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 47,909
And1: 11,582
Joined: Jul 17, 2001
       

Re: You've seen enough: To Beal or not to Beal? (Poll) 

Post#165 » by Ruzious » Tue Jun 7, 2016 8:46 pm

Yeah, Melo at 32 isn't who I'd be looking to acquire. Besides, Melo has said he doesn't want to come back to the area. I'm trying to face the fact that we're going to likely pay Beal the max to stay - which I think is a big mistake.
"A common mistake that people make when trying to design something completely foolproof is to underestimate the ingenuity of complete fools." - Douglas Adams
fishercob
RealGM
Posts: 13,922
And1: 1,571
Joined: Apr 25, 2002
Location: Tenleytown, DC

Re: You've seen enough: To Beal or not to Beal? (Poll) 

Post#166 » by fishercob » Mon Jun 13, 2016 12:31 pm

Beal has declared himself to be a max player. What if the market disagrees -- i.e. what if he finds himself in a Bledsoe or Greg Monroe situation whereby no team is willing to give him a max contract as an RFA?

Knowing the cap is going up even more next summer, would Beal consider taking the QO from the Wizards and betting on himself doing better next summer? If I was his agent, I'd certainly advise against it. But pride is a funny thing.

Here's my question: if Beal indeed signs a qualifying offer and becomes a UFA next summer, would the Wizards still be able to offer him that additional fifth year, whereby other teams could not?
"Some people have a way with words....some people....not have way."
— Steve Martin
verbal8
General Manager
Posts: 8,352
And1: 1,377
Joined: Jul 20, 2006
Location: Herndon, VA
     

Re: You've seen enough: To Beal or not to Beal? (Poll) 

Post#167 » by verbal8 » Mon Jun 13, 2016 12:52 pm

fishercob wrote:Here's my question: if Beal indeed signs a qualifying offer and becomes a UFA next summer, would the Wizards still be able to offer him that additional fifth year, whereby other teams could not?


He would still be a Birds-right FA, so they can resign him to the 5th year and higher raises.

It would seem like really bad negotiating that would lead to Beal even threatening to go the QA route. The Wizards have a strong case for any 4 year deal over $95 million since that is the most another team can offer. With the 5th year the best case(QA followed by 4 year max deal with higher cap) for Beal is $118 million. The 5 year max from the Wizards is $128 million.
User avatar
tontoz
RealGM
Posts: 20,253
And1: 5,029
Joined: Apr 11, 2005

Re: You've seen enough: To Beal or not to Beal? (Poll) 

Post#168 » by tontoz » Mon Jun 13, 2016 4:07 pm

Ben Gordon was better than Beal but the Bulls refused to max him when he became a RFA. He ended up taking the QO after the Bulls pulled their offer. Then he left the following year for nothing. Smart move by the Bulls.
"bulky agile perimeter bone crunch pick setting draymond green" WizD
Slimreaper703
Sophomore
Posts: 164
And1: 137
Joined: Feb 16, 2015

Re: You've seen enough: To Beal or not to Beal? (Poll) 

Post#169 » by Slimreaper703 » Wed Jun 15, 2016 1:16 pm

The market has changed.
The Max really doesn't mean Elite anymore, it has extended to role players and starters.

Case in point.. Their talking about giving Harrison Barnes the max

Wesley Matthews, Brook Lopez, Greg Monroe, Enes Kanter, Reggie Jackson and Tristan Thompson all got max deals of varying lengths and salaries this past offseason.


So yea Max Bradley Beal...
User avatar
tontoz
RealGM
Posts: 20,253
And1: 5,029
Joined: Apr 11, 2005

Re: You've seen enough: To Beal or not to Beal? (Poll) 

Post#170 » by tontoz » Wed Jun 15, 2016 1:26 pm

Slimreaper703 wrote:The market has changed.
The Max really doesn't mean Elite anymore, it has extended to role players and starters.

Case in point.. Their talking about giving Harrison Barnes the max

Wesley Matthews, Brook Lopez, Greg Monroe, Enes Kanter, Reggie Jackson and Tristan Thompson all got max deals of varying lengths and salaries this past offseason.


So yea Max Bradley Beal...


Some of those guys got the max recently, meaning that the GM's knew the cap was about to go way up so those max deals wouldn't hurt their cap situation as much going forward. Can't compare maxing Beal to those deals because it isn't the same situation. A max deal now would be far more than those guys got.
"bulky agile perimeter bone crunch pick setting draymond green" WizD
pcbothwel
Head Coach
Posts: 6,213
And1: 2,778
Joined: Jun 12, 2010
     

Re: You've seen enough: To Beal or not to Beal? (Poll) 

Post#171 » by pcbothwel » Wed Jun 15, 2016 4:40 pm

Exactly tontoz. Reggie Jackson making 16M is much better than Barnes at 22M. If the salary cap stayed the same (70M), Barnes & Beal are 12M per year players. With an increase to 92M, that pushes them up to about 16M. The further increase to 108M pushes them to 18M.

So a fair contract-ish for both of them would be about 4/72-75M
16/17 - 16M
17/18 - 18M
18/19 - 19M
19/20 - 20M

I would still max Beal if need be, but i wouldnt like it (though 3/60M would be easier to swallow)

Return to Washington Wizards