Moderators: LyricalRico, nate33, montestewart
Yet another...closg00 wrote:AFM wrote:GUESS ITS US WIZ FANS THAT BE TAKIN IT IN THA ASS!!!!!!!!!!!
fitting that we have Dwight then....for the next TWO YEARS, another Ernie signed player enjoying a rehab on Ted’s dime.
WallToWall wrote:FAH1223 wrote:
Well, 30 games was the over/under that I set up when we signed him...
If he comes back in mid march, that would put him at 30 games played for the season.
nate33 wrote:Hopefully, he'll play just long enough and just well enough to opt out of his 2nd year.
He's getting over.Wizardspride wrote:nate33 wrote:Hopefully, he'll play just long enough and just well enough to opt out of his 2nd year.
To be honest, I wouldn't mind him returning next season.
It's not like he's making big money.
nate33 wrote:WallToWall wrote:Wizardspride wrote:To be honest, I wouldn't mind him returning next season.
It's not like he's making big money.
I would want him to come back next year. For the money, if next year we get 45 games out of him, with 25 mins and 10 pts/game, 8 rbs/game average, I would say its money well spent. If we get more production than that from him, then I'd call it a "good deal" from the Wizards perspective.
You have to factor that we will (hopefully) already have a capable center in Bryant. Assuming we play a traditional center for roughly 40 minutes a game, Bryant should already be getting 30-32 of them. We would be paying Howard $6M to play 8-10 minutes (or to play him in place of Bryant, which would be a marginal upgrade at best).
If there's any money at all to spend after resigning Sato and Bryant, I'd rather that money going toward another quality power forward (maybe another season of Jeff Green?). Porter and Brown can't play all of the forward minutes next year and we definitely want at least 1 guy who can play some smallball center.
FAH1223 wrote:2 months later...
