ImageImageImageImageImage

Line-ups, rotation, analysis thread.

Moderators: LyricalRico, nate33, montestewart

prime1time
Assistant Coach
Posts: 4,011
And1: 2,224
Joined: Nov 02, 2016
         

Re: Line-ups, rotation, analysis thread. 

Post#1001 » by prime1time » Fri Oct 28, 2022 5:22 pm

dckingsfan wrote:
prime1time wrote:
doclinkin wrote:
That something miraculous happened and he had a basketball transplant? The ghost of somebody with basketball skill has possessed his body?

Nate's point shows that even playing next to Beal or ANYbody on court, Rui has a negative effect on the team's +/-. Rui is not in the negative solely because he is playing with the bench. But the bench is at least partly in the negative because they are playing with Rui.

For example, Deni is noted as a +/- king on this team. We knock him a bit because he defers to other players to set them up to score. But even without him shooting much, or well, the team benefits with him on the court. Put him next to anybody bench or starter, and he has a positive +/-.

Well not quite anybody. Scroll down to the 2-man line-ups.

https://www.basketball-reference.com/players/a/avdijde01/lineups/2023

Pick a bench player, any of them, and even those that have been struggling the most have some player who they have a positive +/- next to. (Deni usually, but generally one other as well). Gafford plays well next to Morris. Gill played in the positive with any starter, and even Davis. But not Rui. Bad effect next to anybody. Small sample sizes of course, but at least he is consistent.

Delon Wright is an interesting case. He played in the negative with everybody but Deni. So much for his defense making all the difference. Not sure what to make of it, except that his reluctance to take a shot means teams can ignore him on that end, and concentrate on others. The bench will look better when Kispert comes back and adds a floor spacer, back door lane attacker. Hopefully his willingness to shoot will force teams to chase outside.

Delon Wright going down makes me think Deni will pick up slack playmaking in the 2nd unit. Will Barton can't carry all the ballhandling duties, some starter or another is going to have to play minutes with the bench at all times.

Let's remove Rui from the conversation and insert generic role-player A. Are you arguing that the right role player could turn the Wizards into a championship contender?

I thought this was the line-ups, rotation, analysis thread? I think that the last question is kind of a false dilemma vs. the spectrum of possibilities with this current team and possible line-ups.

I think the questions should be: with Rui out of the lineup, would we see an improvement?

Also, doc seems to have touched on another really interesting factoid: Wright and Deni. You would think those two playing together would be a disaster, but not so much.

The reason why I asked if replacing Hachimura with a generic role player would turn us into a championship contender, was because what I understand implicitly is that wide swings in on/off are led by elite players. Utilizing on/off to argue for removing someone from the lineup is a non-sequitor due to all the confounding variables that are inherent in the dataset. From a purely logical point of view, the argument itself becomes a Rorschach test of the poster's own pre-conceived opinions. Hachimura sucks so I'm going go and find some dataset that reinforces what I believe and build an argument around it. As of right now Rui is shooting 50/42.9/100 from the field. He is the only Wizards player shooting 50/40/90. Obviously, we should bench him. In addition we should point out that Todd and Davis both have higher on/off than Beal. So obviously they should get more playing time. All this really comes down to is the continued hate of Hachimura.
montestewart
Forum Mod - Wizards
Forum Mod - Wizards
Posts: 14,815
And1: 7,939
Joined: Feb 25, 2009

Re: Line-ups, rotation, analysis thread. 

Post#1002 » by montestewart » Fri Oct 28, 2022 5:24 pm

nate33 wrote:
Zonkerbl wrote:What is Porzingis' +-?

https://www.basketball-reference.com/

Let me Google that for you
tleikheen
Assistant Coach
Posts: 4,094
And1: 1,103
Joined: Feb 07, 2010

Re: Line-ups, rotation, analysis thread. 

Post#1003 » by tleikheen » Fri Oct 28, 2022 5:32 pm

The reason why I asked if replacing Hachimura with a generic role player would turn us into a championship contender, was because what I understand implicitly is that wide swings in on/off are led by elite players. Utilizing on/off to argue for removing someone from the lineup is a non-sequitor due to all the confounding variables that are inherent in the dataset. From a purely logical point of view, the argument itself becomes a Rorschach test of the poster's own pre-conceived opinions. Hachimura sucks so I'm going go and find some dataset that reinforces what I believe and build an argument around it. As of right now Rui is shooting 50/42.9/100 from the field. He is the only Wizards player shooting 50/40/90. Obviously, we should bench him. In addition we should point out that Todd and Davis both have higher on/off than Beal. So obviously they should get more playing time. All this really comes down to is the continued hate of Hachimura.


I 2nd this ,ive been saying the same thing over and over .....what NBA team would trade a career 48 per cent shooter who's only 24 and shooting 50/40 right now ,his game doesnt go into a shooting slump.

The one thing I didn't see was the Wiz struggling on offense ,ranking 21st. So dumping the most efficient scorer the Wizards have is a minor league move,dumping young ascending talent to teams that want to win.
montestewart
Forum Mod - Wizards
Forum Mod - Wizards
Posts: 14,815
And1: 7,939
Joined: Feb 25, 2009

Re: Line-ups, rotation, analysis thread. 

Post#1004 » by montestewart » Fri Oct 28, 2022 5:39 pm

nate33 wrote:
payitforward wrote:[As to prime's question: not only is there no role player who "could turn the Wizards into a championship contender," but there is also no single player in the league, none, not even Giannis, who would turn the Wizards into a championship contender.

I don't think that's true at all. You are wildly underestimating how a first rate superstar bends a defense and makes life easier for teammates. Note only that, but a superstar would bump everyone else down the rotation a notch, putting them into a role where they fit better.

Beal and Porzingis are not #1 options, but they'd be fine as #2 and #3 options. Kuzma, Avdija, Barton, Morris and Wright may not be above average starters, but if they're the 4th through 8th men, they're solid. Kuzma has a ring as the 5th best guy on his team. Barton was the 4th best guy on a Denver team that made the WCF's.

If you added Giannis or Luka to this team, they would compete for a championship.

It’s unusual but not unheard of for one stellar player to quickly change a team’s record. Adding Jabbar, Bird, Moses Malone, Steve Nash, Mutombo (to name a few) to teams made a drastic difference in the teams’ fortunes. Harden almost did it in Houston. LeBron has arguably done it with more than one team.
prime1time
Assistant Coach
Posts: 4,011
And1: 2,224
Joined: Nov 02, 2016
         

Re: Line-ups, rotation, analysis thread. 

Post#1005 » by prime1time » Fri Oct 28, 2022 5:52 pm

Here's the truth about the Wizards. Far from trying to completely remove Hachimura's minutes, Hachmiura, outside of Beal/Porzingis/Kuzma, is our most indispensable player. Using on/off not as the sole piece as evidence but rather as just one part of a larger picture it is very easy to draw some conclusions. Wes' insistence on going to all bench lineups sets up our team to have a very large gap in on/off between starters and bench players. The reason is self-evident. The idea is that the starters pull away and then the bench does well enough to maintain the lead. By the very nature of the lineup, it pre-supposes that bench players will have a negative on/off.

Now, what is Rui's role in this team? And why is it that Rui has the worst on/off on the team. It is because he is our bench scorer. So when the big guns are on the bench - Kuzma, Beal, Porzingis - the offense runs through Rui. So his minutes contrast that of our best players. I.e. the people who can really shape on/off. Given Rui's role on this team, think about what a positive on/off would mean regarding Rui? You want to know why Avdija's and Morriss' on/off are so high? Because their minutes tend to coincide with that of Beal/Porzingis/Kuzma.

There are legitimate criticisms to be made regarding Rui, but when posters on this board refuse to be objective it is kind of perplexing. In lineups that are devoid of floor spacing, Rui is shooting 50/42.9/100 splits. Given this kind of offensive efficiency, the obvious answer isn't to completely remove his minutes but to hide him defensively via scheme and minimize the negative impact. The most valuable skill in the NBA is the ability to score efficiently. As much as posters on this board may not like it, Hachimura has this skill. And Wes has built the teams entire rotation around it. If you don't believe me, see how many minutes there is a lineup on the floor that doesn't have one of Brad/Kristaps/Kuzma/Rui. Also, see who has the most non Brad/Kristaps/Kuzma minutes.
User avatar
doclinkin
RealGM
Posts: 15,087
And1: 6,826
Joined: Jul 26, 2004
Location: .wizuds.

Re: Line-ups, rotation, analysis thread. 

Post#1006 » by doclinkin » Fri Oct 28, 2022 5:53 pm

prime1time wrote:The reason why I asked if replacing Hachimura with a generic role player would turn us into a championship contender, was because what I understand implicitly is that wide swings in on/off are led by elite players. Utilizing on/off to argue for removing someone from the lineup is a non-sequitor due to all the confounding variables that are inherent in the dataset. From a purely logical point of view, the argument itself becomes a Rorschach test of the poster's own pre-conceived opinions. Hachimura sucks so I'm going go and find some dataset that reinforces what I believe and build an argument around it. As of right now Rui is shooting 50/42.9/100 from the field. He is the only Wizards player shooting 50/40/90. Obviously, we should bench him. In addition we should point out that Todd and Davis both have higher on/off than Beal. So obviously they should get more playing time. All this really comes down to is the continued hate of Hachimura.


Dunno about hate, but feel free to explain why the Hachimura has had a negative point differential every year of his career. If he didn't suck in team play I'd have a higher opinion of him. He could learn it. HIs offensive talent will probably keep him in the league long enough for him to become a veteran. He is way behind the curve right now.

I agree that his offensive numbers look good. That was my central premise about why he will have solid value in trade. Or in my estimation: potentially more value in trade than he has had on court for his entire career. If I was gambling with other peoples' money I'd love to have the draft picks of the team that swaps for him and tries to play him in a central role after paying him his next contract. Teams and fans ignore defensive skills, overpay for pretty offense. Ergo, front offices might be willing to let go picks that only ripen a few years down the line, in favor of a guy who looks good, has sexy scoring numbers, and brings a market with him that makes a significant jump in ad revenues etc. If they re-sign him, they will feel obligated to play him. So far, for his career, that looks like a losing proposition, no matter who he has played next to. There is enough data there to draw the conclusion that however he looks, he is just not good. "Yet" is what you are gambling on.

You know full well you can do nothing with the 3 minutes each that Todd and Davis have had.
tleikheen
Assistant Coach
Posts: 4,094
And1: 1,103
Joined: Feb 07, 2010

Re: Line-ups, rotation, analysis thread. 

Post#1007 » by tleikheen » Fri Oct 28, 2022 6:14 pm

Dunno about hate, but feel free to explain why the Hachimura has had a negative point differential every year of his career.


Wiz record in 19/20 W25-47L
20/21 W34-38L
21/22 W35-47L

Wow Rui did all that losing for them
payitforward
RealGM
Posts: 24,718
And1: 9,157
Joined: May 02, 2012
Location: On the Atlantic

Re: Line-ups, rotation, analysis thread. 

Post#1008 » by payitforward » Fri Oct 28, 2022 7:20 pm

dckingsfan wrote:
payitforward wrote:
dckingsfan wrote:...I think the questions should be: with Rui out of the lineup, would we see an improvement?...

What am I missing in this exchange, I wonder...?

If a player better than Rui played instead of him, we'd be better. If the guy who replaced Rui was worse, we'd be worse.

Replace Rui's name with Brad's or any other name & the 2 statements remain true.

As to prime's question: not only is there no role player who "could turn the Wizards into a championship contender," but there is also no single player in the league, none, not even Giannis, who would turn the Wizards into a championship contender.

For this thread - the question should be which players could we play instead of Rui to have a better outcome. ...

Fair point. Although...

1. I'm not sure anyone said "don't play Rui."
2. We're 3-1. How much better an outcome might we have expected?

But, wait... I've got it! Our one loss was to the Cavs, right? & we tied them in regulation, right? Hence, literally any measurable improvement in regulation would have given us the win, right?

Now, as it happens, that game was pretty clearly Kuzma's worst game so far -- he didn't shoot well, & he rebounded horribly. Yet, he played 37 minutes. OTOH, also as it happens, that was Rui's best game so far. He scored 16 points on only 12 shots in 20 minutes.

Seems to me that if we'd played Rui 25 minutes in regulation that game, instead of 20 minutes, & we'd taken those 5 extra minutes from Kuz, it's very likely that we would have won the game in regulation.

So there's your "better outcome" -- & it's from more Rui not less!

So, the next time Rui is playing well & Kuzma isn't playing well, up Rui's minutes & pull Kuz.

Any questions?
User avatar
nate33
Forum Mod - Wizards
Forum Mod - Wizards
Posts: 70,269
And1: 22,695
Joined: Oct 28, 2002

Re: Line-ups, rotation, analysis thread. 

Post#1009 » by nate33 » Fri Oct 28, 2022 7:43 pm

tleikheen wrote:
The reason why I asked if replacing Hachimura with a generic role player would turn us into a championship contender, was because what I understand implicitly is that wide swings in on/off are led by elite players. Utilizing on/off to argue for removing someone from the lineup is a non-sequitor due to all the confounding variables that are inherent in the dataset. From a purely logical point of view, the argument itself becomes a Rorschach test of the poster's own pre-conceived opinions. Hachimura sucks so I'm going go and find some dataset that reinforces what I believe and build an argument around it. As of right now Rui is shooting 50/42.9/100 from the field. He is the only Wizards player shooting 50/40/90. Obviously, we should bench him. In addition we should point out that Todd and Davis both have higher on/off than Beal. So obviously they should get more playing time. All this really comes down to is the continued hate of Hachimura.


I 2nd this ,ive been saying the same thing over and over .....what NBA team would trade a career 48 per cent shooter who's only 24 and shooting 50/40 right now ,his game doesnt go into a shooting slump.

The one thing I didn't see was the Wiz struggling on offense ,ranking 21st. So dumping the most efficient scorer the Wizards have is a minor league move, dumping young ascending talent to teams that want to win.


Rui is not the most efficient scorer on the Wizards. Out of the 9 players with 50+ minutes played (Beal, Kuzma, Porzingis, Barton, Morris, Hachimura, Wright, Avdija and Gafford), Hachimura ranks 6th by TS% and dead last by ORtg (which is basically TS% plus some extra credit for assists, offensive rebounds, and low turnovers). He is arguably the least efficient scorer.

This is the problem with Rui. While the top line numbers like FG% 3P% and FT% look good, the reality is that they're not really that good because such a high percentage of his shots are 2-pointers, and he does nothing else to fill the rest of box score.
payitforward
RealGM
Posts: 24,718
And1: 9,157
Joined: May 02, 2012
Location: On the Atlantic

Re: Line-ups, rotation, analysis thread. 

Post#1010 » by payitforward » Fri Oct 28, 2022 7:56 pm

tleikheen wrote:
The reason why I asked if replacing Hachimura with a generic role player would turn us into a championship contender, was because what I understand implicitly is that wide swings in on/off are led by elite players. Utilizing on/off to argue for removing someone from the lineup is a non-sequitor due to all the confounding variables that are inherent in the dataset. From a purely logical point of view, the argument itself becomes a Rorschach test of the poster's own pre-conceived opinions. Hachimura sucks so I'm going go and find some dataset that reinforces what I believe and build an argument around it. As of right now Rui is shooting 50/42.9/100 from the field. He is the only Wizards player shooting 50/40/90. Obviously, we should bench him. In addition we should point out that Todd and Davis both have higher on/off than Beal. So obviously they should get more playing time. All this really comes down to is the continued hate of Hachimura.


I 2nd this ,ive been saying the same thing over and over .....what NBA team would trade a career 48 per cent shooter who's only 24 and shooting 50/40 right now ,his game doesnt go into a shooting slump.

The one thing I didn't see was the Wiz struggling on offense ,ranking 21st. So dumping the most efficient scorer the Wizards have is a minor league move, dumping young ascending talent to teams that want to win.

This is starting to get kinda funny....

Is Rui "the most efficient scorer the Wizards have"?? No.
How about 2d most efficient? Nah, sorry.
I guess he must be our 3d most efficient scorer, huh? Nope.
Oh come on! You're not saying he's our 4th most efficient scorer are you? Nope, sorry -- can't say that either!
What? You're saying he's only the 5th most efficient...? Close, really close! He's tied with Monte Morris for the 5th/6th spot.

Of course, Monte is a pg, & average for a PG is 54.6%, so Monte's 58.2% is really really good.
Average for a PF, otoh, is 58.3% -- but, hey, why quibble? Rui's 58.2% is close enough to call average.

Btw, I didn't include Jordan Goodwin in the above; he's only played a couple of minutes & his TS% is better than the best.

Of guys who've played, say, 50 minutes or more, only Deni, KP & Wright have lower TS% so far. Of course, Deni & Wright have done so many other things so well that overall they are in the top handful of Wizards in productivity this season. KP is struggling badly, otoh.
payitforward
RealGM
Posts: 24,718
And1: 9,157
Joined: May 02, 2012
Location: On the Atlantic

Re: Line-ups, rotation, analysis thread. 

Post#1011 » by payitforward » Fri Oct 28, 2022 8:19 pm

Of course, scoring is only 1 thing an NBA 4 does, so Rui's being just about "average" in scoring doesn't mean that he's "average" overall compared to other NBA 4s in the game numbers he puts up. So... how's he doing in those aspects of the game?

Well, Rui doesn't foul much at all. So that's good. Alas, that's also where the good news ends. :(

Rui is below average in defensive boards.
He's well below average in offensive boards.
He gets less than half the average number of assists.
He turns the ball over 52% more often than an average 4.
He blocks less than 40% as many shots as an average 4.
An average 4 records about 1 steal per 40 minutes. Rui hasn't had a single steal yet this season.

Rui seems to be a really nice kid. I'm pulling for him. But, there's not a whole lot of time left for him to turn it around.

& "turn it around" is exactly what he needs to do. To pull no punches, Rui has been a bad player through 4 plus seasons. Lousy. & he's going to turn 25 in early February. The door is closing, & it's closing fast.

He won't be out of the league; he brings the entire Japan market, a financial benefit that will keep him in the NBA. But, he needs to get a lot better, & he needs to do it now, if he is to become a "good" player in any sense of the word.
dckingsfan
RealGM
Posts: 34,889
And1: 20,434
Joined: May 28, 2010

Re: Line-ups, rotation, analysis thread. 

Post#1012 » by dckingsfan » Fri Oct 28, 2022 8:36 pm

payitforward wrote:
dckingsfan wrote:
payitforward wrote:What am I missing in this exchange, I wonder...?

If a player better than Rui played instead of him, we'd be better. If the guy who replaced Rui was worse, we'd be worse.

Replace Rui's name with Brad's or any other name & the 2 statements remain true.

As to prime's question: not only is there no role player who "could turn the Wizards into a championship contender," but there is also no single player in the league, none, not even Giannis, who would turn the Wizards into a championship contender.

For this thread - the question should be which players could we play instead of Rui to have a better outcome. ...

Fair point. Although...

1. I'm not sure anyone said "don't play Rui."
2. We're 3-1. How much better an outcome might we have expected?

But, wait... I've got it! Our one loss was to the Cavs, right? & we tied them in regulation, right? Hence, literally any measurable improvement in regulation would have given us the win, right?

Now, as it happens, that game was pretty clearly Kuzma's worst game so far -- he didn't shoot well, & he rebounded horribly. Yet, he played 37 minutes. OTOH, also as it happens, that was Rui's best game so far. He scored 16 points on only 12 shots in 20 minutes.

Seems to me that if we'd played Rui 25 minutes in regulation that game, instead of 20 minutes, & we'd taken those 5 extra minutes from Kuz, it's very likely that we would have won the game in regulation.

So there's your "better outcome" -- & it's from more Rui not less!

So, the next time Rui is playing well & Kuzma isn't playing well, up Rui's minutes & pull Kuz.

Any questions?

Great points... it will be interesting to see if Wes can play the hot hand vs. his standard rotations.

Will Wes be able to adjust in-game is a really good question in my mind.
payitforward
RealGM
Posts: 24,718
And1: 9,157
Joined: May 02, 2012
Location: On the Atlantic

Re: Line-ups, rotation, analysis thread. 

Post#1013 » by payitforward » Fri Oct 28, 2022 8:44 pm

Sure, but let's not turn up our noses at 3-1, ok? :)
dckingsfan
RealGM
Posts: 34,889
And1: 20,434
Joined: May 28, 2010

Re: Line-ups, rotation, analysis thread. 

Post#1014 » by dckingsfan » Fri Oct 28, 2022 9:14 pm

payitforward wrote:Sure, but let's not turn up our noses at 3-1, ok? :)

I think there are a couple of nice reasons for this. The Beal/Porzingis duo has been taking a lot of the pressure off the offense - or making them more efficient.

And the second is the defensive schema(s) and defensive effort.
User avatar
doclinkin
RealGM
Posts: 15,087
And1: 6,826
Joined: Jul 26, 2004
Location: .wizuds.

Re: Line-ups, rotation, analysis thread. 

Post#1015 » by doclinkin » Fri Oct 28, 2022 9:16 pm

tleikheen wrote:
Dunno about hate, but feel free to explain why the Hachimura has had a negative point differential every year of his career.


Wiz record in 19/20 W25-47L
20/21 W34-38L
21/22 W35-47L

Wow Rui did all that losing for them


Right? Considering he started every game he played his first 2 years, and a third of the games he played last year.

Yet somehow Deni and Anthony Gill managed to put up positive on/off numbers the last 2 years. Was the bench so much better than the starters? Is that why we were losing? If so, what does that say about Rui?

But fellow starter Beal somehow managed a positive +/-, in those years. Even in a year when he played admittedly '5hitty" as he said.

Negative On off numbers simply mean the team scored better than the opponent when you are off court, than when you are on court. You can spotlight the effects of a particular player when you look at the line-ups they played. No matter who he played with, and no matter how well he shot, the team tended to lose when Rui is on the floor. 4000 minutes is enough of a sample size to see the effect that Rui's subpar defense has on the players he is next to. It's not a mystery. He's a bad team defender. He makes players around him worse since they have to effectively defend short-handed.
payitforward
RealGM
Posts: 24,718
And1: 9,157
Joined: May 02, 2012
Location: On the Atlantic

Re: Line-ups, rotation, analysis thread. 

Post#1016 » by payitforward » Sun Oct 30, 2022 1:28 am

I've never had much belief in on/off numbers, & in any case you can't conclude from negative on/off that Rui makes other guys worse. If you sub a single worse player for a single better player, you get worse team numbers independent of any of the other guys.

But there's no dispute about Rui's numbers. Anyone can see them. They aren't good. They never have been good. It's pretty simple: if Rui is going to become a solid NBA player, he's going to have to improve. Period.

He's already improved as a scorer, though he's a little bit behind last year to this point early in the season.

But, his big problem is the negative changes of his numbers in other areas: his assists are way down, he hasn't posted a single steal yet, & he's turning the ball over almost twice as often as last year. Not good.
User avatar
FAH1223
RealGM
Posts: 16,307
And1: 7,409
Joined: Nov 01, 2005
Location: Laurel, MD
       

Re: Line-ups, rotation, analysis thread. 

Post#1017 » by FAH1223 » Sun Oct 30, 2022 1:57 am

payitforward wrote:I've never had much belief in on/off numbers, & in any case you can't conclude from negative on/off that Rui makes other guys worse. If you sub a single worse player for a single better player, you get worse team numbers independent of any of the other guys.

But there's no dispute about Rui's numbers. Anyone can see them. They aren't good. They never have been good. It's pretty simple: if Rui is going to become a solid NBA player, he's going to have to improve. Period.

He's already improved as a scorer, though he's a little bit behind last year to this point early in the season.

But, his big problem is the negative changes of his numbers in other areas: his assists are way down, he hasn't posted a single steal yet, & he's turning the ball over almost twice as often as last year. Not good.


I'd like to trade Rui for a PG
Image
dckingsfan
RealGM
Posts: 34,889
And1: 20,434
Joined: May 28, 2010

Re: Line-ups, rotation, analysis thread. 

Post#1018 » by dckingsfan » Sun Oct 30, 2022 2:05 am

payitforward wrote:I've never had much belief in on/off numbers, & in any case you can't conclude from negative on/off that Rui makes other guys worse. If you sub a single worse player for a single better player, you get worse team numbers independent of any of the other guys.

But there's no dispute about Rui's numbers. Anyone can see them. They aren't good. They never have been good. It's pretty simple: if Rui is going to become a solid NBA player, he's going to have to improve. Period.

He's already improved as a scorer, though he's a little bit behind last year to this point early in the season.

But, his big problem is the negative changes of his numbers in other areas: his assists are way down, he hasn't posted a single steal yet, & he's turning the ball over almost twice as often as last year. Not good.

Since this is the rotation and analysis thread we should test this proposition.

If I was to try to test this proposition. I would start with the following in basketball terms. Is there a scenario where this isn't true.

I would say if there is a lineup with one PG and 4 Cs and I was to substitute in another C for the PG, then it could easily be that you could substitute in a better player and get worse team numbers.

Hence I would say that the proposition: if you sub a single worse player for a single better player, you get worse team numbers independent of any of the other guys does not stand independently. Rather it would only stand positionally.

I would say that there are certainly some players that play better with other players - a rotation if you will where the output is greater than what you would expect from the sum of the parts.

The rest of the post stands of course. But it an interesting question to me - is there a rotation and set of schemas that would accentuate his strengths and hide his weaknesses.
payitforward
RealGM
Posts: 24,718
And1: 9,157
Joined: May 02, 2012
Location: On the Atlantic

Re: Line-ups, rotation, analysis thread. 

Post#1019 » by payitforward » Sun Oct 30, 2022 3:21 am

dckingsfan wrote:
payitforward wrote:I've never had much belief in on/off numbers, & in any case you can't conclude from negative on/off that Rui makes other guys worse. If you sub a single worse player for a single better player, you get worse team numbers independent of any of the other guys.

But there's no dispute about Rui's numbers. Anyone can see them. They aren't good. They never have been good. It's pretty simple: if Rui is going to become a solid NBA player, he's going to have to improve. Period.

He's already improved as a scorer, though he's a little bit behind last year to this point early in the season.

But, his big problem is the negative changes of his numbers in other areas: his assists are way down, he hasn't posted a single steal yet, & he's turning the ball over almost twice as often as last year. Not good.

Since this is the rotation and analysis thread we should test this proposition.

If I was to try to test this proposition. I would start with the following in basketball terms. Is there a scenario where this isn't true.

I would say if there is a lineup with one PG and 4 Cs and I was to substitute in another C for the PG, then it could easily be that you could substitute in a better player and get worse team numbers.

Hence I would say that the proposition: if you sub a single worse player for a single better player, you get worse team numbers independent of any of the other guys does not stand independently. Rather it would only stand positionally.

I would say that there are certainly some players that play better with other players - a rotation if you will where the output is greater than what you would expect from the sum of the parts.

The rest of the post stands of course. But it an interesting question to me - is there a rotation and set of schemas that would accentuate his strengths and hide his weaknesses.

Actually, in my foolishness, I was thinking about the real world. You know... the one where things really happen?

In that world, if you make a substitution, taking out player A & replacing him with player B, then if B isn't as good a player as A you would expect -- over the run of occasions when you make this move but not, of course, on each occasion -- that the team results, overall, will be worse.

In fact, since calling one guy "better" & another "worse" means that the "better" guy is more productive than the "worse" guy, this is true analytically. If Mr. Better isn't more productive overall than Mr. Worse, the team results cannot be better with him playing than w/ Mr. Worse playing.

What the possible real-world point would be of attempting to deny a fact which amounts to arithmetic & nothing more... I just don't know.

As to accentuating a guy's strengths & hiding his weaknesses... if his weakness is rebounding, how would you propose to hide that? No, you can't hide it by playing him with a guy who's a good rebounder -- I hope that's obvious. You might as well claim that if his strength is 3-point shooting you can "accentuate" it by playing him with a bad 3-point shooter!

A player is as good as the numbers he puts up when on the court -- quantity numbers & percentage numbers. Period.

Some of those numbers are immediately visible, others require a level of analysis, but everything you need in order to know how good a player can be found in what the guy does while playing. Duh.

Or, to put the same fact another way: find me a player in the league who is outstanding but doesn't put up outstanding numbers. You can't do it.

As to

dckingsfan wrote:...a rotation if you will where the output is greater than what you would expect from the sum of the parts....

first off, the output of the whole is exactly the sum of the individual outputs of all the parts (i.e. players). & is nothing but that.

As to "greater than what you would expect..." didn't doc make the point clearly enough, man? His claim was that all lineups with Rui in them, over his whole career, are worse than the same lineups with another player instead of Rui.

In other words, insofar as we are to judge Rui by his effect on the guys he plays with, he makes them worse.

Now, my guess is that lineups with Rui in them are worse than lineups without Rui in them largely because Rui's numbers are ba. But, if the stronger version is true, that other guys put up worse numbers with Rui on the floor than with another player on the floor instead of him, then what room is there for your attempt to find a lineup that will be better with Rui than without?

Rui Hachimura is as good a player as the numbers he puts up when he plays. Duh. He's not better than those numbers, & he's not worse than them.

So far, after 3 full seasons & 4 games of a 4th season, the numbers Rui puts up when he plays are bad. Ergo, Rui is a bad player.

Rui, like any player, can improve by putting up better numbers. That's why it was correct to say that upping his 3 point % indicated an area in which Rui became better. A better player. No one can -- or should want to -- deny the fact.

So too, the fact that his other numbers, overall, have gotten worse rather than better make it correct to say that Rui has not gotten better overall but rather has gotten worse. & that is true. It's unfortunate, but it's true all the same.
dckingsfan
RealGM
Posts: 34,889
And1: 20,434
Joined: May 28, 2010

Re: Line-ups, rotation, analysis thread. 

Post#1020 » by dckingsfan » Sun Oct 30, 2022 3:11 pm

payitforward wrote:A player is as good as the numbers he puts up when on the court -- quantity numbers & percentage numbers. Period.

Again, this proposition fails the proof. A player will produce differently depending on the players that player is playing with as well as the schema that player is playing in (the 5 center rotation that isn't real world but proves the point).

Given that this is the line-ups and rotation analysis thread. I would think you would need to have a way to prove otherwise, no?

One could posit that Rui isn't a good player. Fair enough. But it is an entirely different proposition to posit that there isn't an ideal rotation to maximize Rui's numbers within this current roster and a set of schemas that a coach could roll out.

Or let me put it another way, if I was going to accentuate Rui's inability to rebound, I would pair him with Gafford and Gill.

Return to Washington Wizards