ImageImageImageImageImage

Official 2013 Draft Thread - Part II

Moderators: LyricalRico, nate33, montestewart

nuposse04
RealGM
Posts: 11,310
And1: 2,468
Joined: Jul 20, 2004
Location: on a rock
   

Re: Official 2013 Draft Thread - Part II 

Post#1021 » by nuposse04 » Mon Mar 25, 2013 8:16 pm

Dat2U wrote:
stevemcqueen1 wrote:
jmrosenth wrote:Zeller seemed to be pressing yesterday. It wasn't his best game, obvs, but he still hut some clutch free throws and hit 'Dipo for the game-winning assist. Despite the concerns about his game, he's not going to be a realistic option for the Wizards where they are picking. We would be extremely lucky if he falls to us.


Agreed. I think he's a top five pick and I wouldn't be surprised if he went top three.

We keep winning and this class doesn't look that good. I think we just need to pick the BPA. The only position I'd lean away from is PG since I think the team needs a veteran in the backup role. But if the PG is the clear BPA, we probably have to go ahead and pick him. We just need to make sure the guy we pick can play and we can deal him later if need be.


With Zeller its all going to depend on his measurements. His brother measured 8'8" which is miserable for a PF, much less a C. There just aren't many examples of even PFs being successful with a standing reach of under 8'10". I wanna say Blake is the only exception mainly due to his freakish athleticism (but it really hurts him defensively).

So if Cody is similar to his brother's length I'm going to have major concerns. If it's at or just above the 8'10" threshold then he may need to transition to PF. For him to realistically play C he really needs to be in the 8'11 to 9'0 range and above. I think Al Horford & Nene are the only exceptions to this (8'10.5) an both of them would prefer to play the PF position.


Both of them have a superior first step as well, plus they are both considerably more powerful than Zeller. I think Nene will eventually have to make the transition over to a full time center, which isn't all too bad. The NBA is becoming a smaller league more oriented toward wing play, so Zeller's lack of true center strength may not be the worst thing imaginable. We also have to consider the future 4/5 players in the EC:

Drummond-probably will become the most dominant big man in the East
Monroe- He's like a better shooting version of Zeller with a bit more strength and better passing
Bosh-Built kind of like Zeller but is a way better shooter and quicker. Longer too, Zeller can't guard him.
Hibbert-He's far too big for Zeller to guard as a center. Fundamentals are good with him too. Zeller could have a chance if he took him off the dribble.
J. Val- Also considerably bigger, comparable athleticism. Already showing signs of a shooting touch.
Tristian Thompson- Already a great rebounder, very strong, he looks like z-bo light honestly. He's improved a lot since last year.
Orlando's bigs- Andrew looks like he could become a quality stretch 4, and Vucic..however you spell it, is a monster on the boards. I think they both project to be superior players.
Larry Sanders- He'd eat Zeller's lunch, lets be honest, he's going to be a defensive monster.
Horford- I've seen him abuse D-12, what chances does Zeller have in trying to play him (Horford at center has been surprisingly good for ATL).
Noah- He'll still be a defensive factor for another 3-4 years I think. He's long enough and a bit more powerful that he could still spell trouble for Zeller.
Bynum-Totally contingent on health but he'd easily manhandle Zeller
Lopez- Brook is underrated and has superior offensive game. His game isn't predicated on athleticism so I'd see him being superior to Zeller for years to come.


The only eastern conference teams that won't make Zeller a liability are the Celtics (who will be old as ****), the knicks (who will be injured as ****) and the Bobcats (who are just terrible as ****).

If you draft a big in top 5, I think he has to have the potential to be dominant in some capacity relative to his competition. Zeller's game isn't bad, I just don't see it becoming dominant. I'd err on the side of Noel, Gobert, Austin and maybe even Len over him based on their potential alone. I take "safe" players like Zeller after the top 10.
User avatar
SUPERBALLMAN
Lead Assistant
Posts: 4,677
And1: 1,351
Joined: Aug 08, 2006
     

Re: Official 2013 Draft Thread - Part II 

Post#1022 » by SUPERBALLMAN » Mon Mar 25, 2013 8:25 pm

The more I try to decipher this draft, the more confusing it gets. I haven't spent a whole lot of effort because everytime I get into it, my head starts spinning and I get a headache. This season really has been helter skelter as far as trying to analyze prospects, from Noel going down, to teams not making the tourney or experiencing early exits.

Other than Noel, Porter remains my hope for the Wizards. DX still has him going 8th, and if he's there for the Wizards that is a no-brainer IMO.

After that is where I begin to struggle. BPA is the way to go, but IMO team fit is something that must strongly be considered. We need someone that will contribute. A guy who has moved up in my eyes is Burke. The more I see of this guy the more I like. But I don't know how he fits on the Wizards beyond a backup to Wall.

There are a slew of starting caliber big men to consider. Alex Len to me has the highest upside out of this group. Yes he has definite flaws, but he is young, with a rare combination of size and mobility. To me he will be better pro than college player, and I can see his skills and physical attributes being translatable to the NBA moreso than some of the other big men prospects. Zeller and Olynyk are next in line as like 1A and 1B. I think Zeller is more polished and proven and probably give him the slight edge for that reason.

Another guy I like under the radar is G.Robinson3. Watching him I question his motor and activity level, especially on the defensive end. But I do see a willingness to rebound which gives me some hope. But he is a smooth and skilled player across the board without doubt.

So with our 1st rounder, if we are picking in the 7-11 area, and guys like Noel and Bennett are gone... I'm looking 1. Porter 2. Len 3. Zeller 4. Olynyk 5. Burke 6. Robinson, in that order dependant on whose still available.

Beyond that 6, I'd then be looking to guys like Poythress, Dieng, McAdoo, Withey.



Some of my top choices in the 2nd round include Muscala, McDermott, and Erick Green.

If I had to pick a personal favorite draft right now, based on who looks to be available at our picks it would be Porter/Muscala. Our later pick I'm sure will be sold for cash, or maybe a draft n stash.
"I love it when a plan comes together" - Colonel John "Hannibal" Smith
User avatar
gambitx777
RealGM
Posts: 10,564
And1: 1,991
Joined: Dec 18, 2012

Re: Official 2013 Draft Thread - Part II 

Post#1023 » by gambitx777 » Mon Mar 25, 2013 9:37 pm

Thats why I hate our front office, there is no reason to sell this pick, there are some nice options late in the draft that we could go with.
such as Sherwood Brown, Ryan Kelly, Alex Oriakhi, Kenny Kadji, Michael Snaer, James Southerland, Robert Covington or Carrick Felix. We should not waste picks like that.
mhd
General Manager
Posts: 9,722
And1: 1,721
Joined: Mar 25, 2004

Re: Official 2013 Draft Thread - Part II 

Post#1024 » by mhd » Mon Mar 25, 2013 10:33 pm

McDermott is only a junior. He;s playing for his Dad. I could see him sticking around for his senior year (although he may bolt b/c this draft is horrible compared to next year's draft).
AFM
RealGM
Posts: 12,623
And1: 8,856
Joined: May 25, 2012
   

Re: Official 2013 Draft Thread - Part II 

Post#1025 » by AFM » Mon Mar 25, 2013 10:56 pm

What's the board's opinion on Russ Smith? Dude has been killing it. Great handle.
User avatar
gambitx777
RealGM
Posts: 10,564
And1: 1,991
Joined: Dec 18, 2012

Re: Official 2013 Draft Thread - Part II 

Post#1026 » by gambitx777 » Mon Mar 25, 2013 11:10 pm

Hes not bad, he is not super efficient, but he can score, and he can defend like a beast ! He turns it over a bit to much but, i like him.
User avatar
SUPERBALLMAN
Lead Assistant
Posts: 4,677
And1: 1,351
Joined: Aug 08, 2006
     

Re: Official 2013 Draft Thread - Part II 

Post#1027 » by SUPERBALLMAN » Mon Mar 25, 2013 11:32 pm

.
"I love it when a plan comes together" - Colonel John "Hannibal" Smith
hands11
Banned User
Posts: 31,171
And1: 2,444
Joined: May 16, 2005

Re: Official 2013 Draft Thread - Part II 

Post#1028 » by hands11 » Tue Mar 26, 2013 2:03 am

Ruzious wrote:
nate33 wrote:I just noticed that Withey shoots 71% from the FT line and shot 80% from the line last year. He doesn't get to the line all that much, so he's unlikely to have developed a rhythm in any particular game, making the percentages that much more impressive.

With those percentages, there's a solid possibility that he can develop a reliable midrange shot. He'll never be a scorer, but if he can force opponents to guard him at 17 feet, he'll be much more valuable on offense.

Withey continues to surprise me with his fluidity on offense. I want to see what he does against top bigs. I don't think he's faced many this season. Baylor's Cory Jefferson (who's much better than Isaiah Austin) destroyed him statistically in a fairly recent game, but that's just 1 game. I think I underrated him because of his age, he's never scored much, and he was over-shadowed by Thomas Robinson last season. But over the last 10 games, he's made 56 of 83 FGA's (67%), and he showed he can hit the boards when focused on it (16 v UNC in a very impressive performance - despite a bunch of to's - because he was doubled and hacked in the face). And you know he can hang his hat on defense. If you have 1 great skill, you can work around deficiencies and at least be a roll player while working on developing other skills. I like Withey... and Cory Jefferson (Baylor's still alive in the NIT).


:nod:

And Pierre.
hands11
Banned User
Posts: 31,171
And1: 2,444
Joined: May 16, 2005

Re: Official 2013 Draft Thread - Part II 

Post#1029 » by hands11 » Tue Mar 26, 2013 2:06 am

popper wrote:Whatever happens regarding our draft position we need to make sure we get a low risk starting caliber player with our first choice. Assuming we draft 8-11 and most of the consensus guys are gone then my preferences would be:


CJ McCollum - low risk starting caliber (would play behind Wall and Beal)
Dieng - low risk starting caliber (would play behind Okafor for a season)
Shabazz if he drops - low risk starting caliber (would play behind Ariza and Beal)
Oladipo if he drops - I think he's more of a backup rotation player - not starting caliber

Len - med. risk starting caliber after developmental year
Olynyk - med. risk - not sure about his defense and rebounding but perhaps more of a backup rotation player

Gobert - high risk starting caliber after developmental year

If EG doesn't F up we should get a solid rotation player with our high second pick


I would be very surprised if CJM is still there but anything is possible. Hell, we might even get the #1 pick.
hands11
Banned User
Posts: 31,171
And1: 2,444
Joined: May 16, 2005

Re: Official 2013 Draft Thread - Part II 

Post#1030 » by hands11 » Tue Mar 26, 2013 2:07 am

hands11 wrote:
popper wrote:Whatever happens regarding our draft position we need to make sure we get a low risk starting caliber player with our first choice. Assuming we draft 8-11 and most of the consensus guys are gone then my preferences would be:


CJ McCollum - low risk starting caliber (would play behind Wall and Beal)
Dieng - low risk starting caliber (would play behind Okafor for a season)
Shabazz if he drops - low risk starting caliber (would play behind Ariza and Beal)
Oladipo if he drops - I think he's more of a backup rotation player - not starting caliber

Len - med. risk starting caliber after developmental year
Olynyk - med. risk - not sure about his defense and rebounding but perhaps more of a backup rotation player

Gobert - high risk starting caliber after developmental year

If EG doesn't F up we should get a solid rotation player with our high second pick




I would very surprised if CJM is still there but anything is possible. Hell, we might even get the #1 pick.
hands11
Banned User
Posts: 31,171
And1: 2,444
Joined: May 16, 2005

Re: Official 2013 Draft Thread - Part II 

Post#1031 » by hands11 » Tue Mar 26, 2013 2:11 am

DCZards wrote:
Dat2U wrote:
I'm still looking for one solid example that would make a case for McLemore's weak handle not being an overriding issue. And it's not something he's necessarily going to develop. If it's rudimentary as a 20 yr old frosh. How much is it going to develop beyond where he is now?


I have no reason to doubt the 20 year old McLemore's ability to get better as a player. He may never have a great handle, but I don't see any reason why it can't improve. He wouldn't be the first young player to significantly improve his ballhandling skills with hard work and good coaching. I guess time will tell.


Oh yeah. With a pro offense being run around him where all he has to do is spot up for wide open shots, he is going to look a ton better. But would you take him or MJ McCollum for the Wizards given they have Wall and Beal.

I would take MJM. Better fit.
User avatar
dandrews
Junior
Posts: 295
And1: 4
Joined: Feb 05, 2012

Re: Official 2013 Draft Thread - Part II 

Post#1032 » by dandrews » Tue Mar 26, 2013 2:17 am

Just so I'm clear, we're still all for trading John Wall and drafting Marcus Smart, right?
MikeTheKid
Head Coach
Posts: 6,827
And1: 4,373
Joined: Jan 24, 2012
Location: DC/MD/VA
         

Re: Official 2013 Draft Thread - Part II 

Post#1033 » by MikeTheKid » Tue Mar 26, 2013 2:19 am

dandrews wrote:Just so I'm clear, we're still all for trading John Wall and drafting Marcus Smart, right?


LOL...........

Image
User avatar
stevemcqueen1
Lead Assistant
Posts: 4,588
And1: 1,137
Joined: Jan 25, 2013
     

Re: Official 2013 Draft Thread - Part II 

Post#1034 » by stevemcqueen1 » Tue Mar 26, 2013 2:59 am

dandrews wrote:Just so I'm clear, we're still all for trading John Wall and drafting Marcus Smart, right?


Was it Marcus Smart or Trey Burke or Kyle Lowry?

Good thing we're not in charge...
theboomking
Sixth Man
Posts: 1,597
And1: 20
Joined: Jan 10, 2011

Re: Official 2013 Draft Thread - Part II 

Post#1035 » by theboomking » Tue Mar 26, 2013 3:38 am

hands11 wrote:
DCZards wrote:
Dat2U wrote:
I'm still looking for one solid example that would make a case for McLemore's weak handle not being an overriding issue. And it's not something he's necessarily going to develop. If it's rudimentary as a 20 yr old frosh. How much is it going to develop beyond where he is now?


I have no reason to doubt the 20 year old McLemore's ability to get better as a player. He may never have a great handle, but I don't see any reason why it can't improve. He wouldn't be the first young player to significantly improve his ballhandling skills with hard work and good coaching. I guess time will tell.


Oh yeah. With a pro offense being run around him where all he has to do is spot up for wide open shots, he is going to look a ton better. But would you take him or MJ McCollum for the Wizards given they have Wall and Beal.

I would take MJM. Better fit.


Why is MJM a better fit? Is it because he can be a spark-plug 3rd guard off the bench? Maybe.

I think McLemore is underrated on this board. To me, he looks he has the potential to be a bigger, more athletic Bradley Beal, and I was one of the 1st on the Beal bandwagon. McLemore scored in higher volume, with a higher FG% and 3P%, had similar assist numbers, significantly less rebounds, and slightly less blocks and steals. I call it a wash with youth going to Beal and size and athleticism going to McLemore.

I love Beal, but he isn't exactly the create your own game off the dribble kind of guy either. We all love him because he looks like a very smart, efficient player, that excels in all phases of the game, and plays within himself. Why can't Mclemore be that kind of a player?

We need to take the BPA with this pick. If that is MJM, then so be it. But if we jump up to the top 3, and McLemore is the best player, then you pick him and give him minutes at backup SG and SF.
http://espn.go.com/mens-college-basketb ... n-mclemore
http://espn.go.com/nba/player/stats/_/i ... adley-beal

I also love the idea of McDermott, but that is really the anti-EG move. I'm not going to root too hard, so I won't be disappointed.

I'm not a big fan of the SF's in this draft. I'm not sure any of them is an upgrade over a healthy Webster. I'd rather get a PF or C, given my druthers, and I hope that is how BPA lines up.

BTW, at this point we are 10th in the league standings, 1 game behind Philly and 7 games behind Portland. As well as we have been playing, I think it is almost a lock that we catch Philly and have the 11th most balls in the lotto. That gives us a 4% chance of picking in the top 3 according to last year's odds. Anyone want to calculate our odds of staying at 11 vs dropping to 12, 13, or 14?
http://www.mynbadraft.com/nba-draft-lottery-odds
User avatar
Rafael122
Forum Mod
Forum Mod
Posts: 20,850
And1: 3,573
Joined: Oct 11, 2004
       

Re: Official 2013 Draft Thread - Part II 

Post#1036 » by Rafael122 » Tue Mar 26, 2013 3:49 am

Looks like we're gonna pick between 9 and 10 at this point, no way we catch Portland who have 33 wins as of this writing. And I'm completely fine with that. According to the ESPN Mock Draft simulator, we now have a 1.5% chance at the number one pick.

Thinking the focus should be on Cody Zeller and CJ McCollum at this point. Though I'm keeping my eye on Gary Harris, could be a scorer off the bench for us. Just a freshman though.
Bickerstaff: who's up for kickball?!!
Ed Wood: Only if it's the no-pants variety.
User avatar
GeneWilderSTL
Sophomore
Posts: 206
And1: 9
Joined: Oct 24, 2009
Location: St Louis
Contact:
   

Re: Official 2013 Draft Thread - Part II 

Post#1037 » by GeneWilderSTL » Tue Mar 26, 2013 5:10 am

you need to build this team similar in fashion to the Celtics '08 team.
46 years... St. Louis NEEDS an NBA Team. Now.
User avatar
gambitx777
RealGM
Posts: 10,564
And1: 1,991
Joined: Dec 18, 2012

Re: Official 2013 Draft Thread - Part II 

Post#1038 » by gambitx777 » Tue Mar 26, 2013 6:27 am

We need to not waste second round picks !!!
hands11
Banned User
Posts: 31,171
And1: 2,444
Joined: May 16, 2005

Re: Official 2013 Draft Thread - Part II 

Post#1039 » by hands11 » Tue Mar 26, 2013 6:45 am

gambitx777 wrote:Thats why I hate our front office, there is no reason to sell this pick, there are some nice options late in the draft that we could go with.
such as Sherwood Brown, Ryan Kelly, Alex Oriakhi, Kenny Kadji, Michael Snaer, James Southerland, Robert Covington or Carrick Felix. We should not waste picks like that.


Who said we are selling the pick ?

Just not seeing how I am going to be happy if we end up with Zeller or Len. If it came down to those two, I hope we get Len. But right now, I don't really want either.

I would rather have McCollum, or Gorgui Dieng or Withey.

We can't blow this draft.
User avatar
Knighthonor
Sixth Man
Posts: 1,865
And1: 98
Joined: Feb 15, 2012

Re: Official 2013 Draft Thread - Part II 

Post#1040 » by Knighthonor » Tue Mar 26, 2013 6:54 am

Wizards are getting top lotto pick for the NO trade remember which helped Stern out. Stern may give the Magic something for Dwightmare. so thats kind of a concern. Maybe Wizards get 2014 lotto instead for the NO trade.

EG has to do his shadow deals better.

Return to Washington Wizards