ImageImageImageImageImage

Political Roundtable Part XII

Moderators: montestewart, LyricalRico, nate33

dckingsfan
RealGM
Posts: 34,956
And1: 20,477
Joined: May 28, 2010

Re: Political Roundtable Part XII 

Post#1141 » by dckingsfan » Sun Feb 5, 2017 5:31 pm

Ruzious wrote:
dckingsfan wrote:More reporters than protesters :)

Knuckleheads.

It's not funny. Knuckleheads is what you call harmless people who do silly things. It only takes one moron to come in there with a rifle and kill people. That's not a hysterical reaction - that's what happened at that same restaurant. And one extremely loud protester with a bunch of his lovely buddies - like in that video - makes it very uncomfortable for a large group of people.

I thought the point of a protest is to make people uncomfortable.

I don't advocate violence in any way, shape or form. Why do you equate my post with acceptance of violence?
User avatar
nate33
Forum Mod - Wizards
Forum Mod - Wizards
Posts: 70,360
And1: 22,771
Joined: Oct 28, 2002

Re: Political Roundtable Part XII 

Post#1142 » by nate33 » Sun Feb 5, 2017 6:52 pm

doclinkin wrote:Jesus, the world you live in. Tell my brown wife and mixed daughter and cambodian foster son and black step son how multiculturalism doesn't work. Or Kev's talented multi ethnic mob. Or etc etc.

Look I was going to disagree with you that we are on different sides of the fence. Because ultimately I think people all want the same things, we just have differing opinions on how best to accomplish those aims. I'll circle back to that point. I guess I just want to speak to the fear in this paragraph. Its not so bad, my friend. Date a brown girl, you'll taste new foods, be happy. try a little multiculti.

I think its ironic that you express views like this in this forum, where the guy who agrees with you the most is a brown skinned latino island immigrant, and you are in regular discourse with red headed russian jews, folks of north african muslim family, pakistani, I can't remember all the different ethnicities we've talked to. And we watch a team in a sport with primarily african american players but in a league where it clearly doesnt matter where a guy is from so long as a guy can play. The San Antonio Spurs regularly fill the roster with guys from every ball-playing continent.

We've BEEN sustained by influxes of talented immigrants over the life of this country. We were founded by purpose-driven immigrants. Migration requires a level of gumption and desire and will and willingness to bet on onesself against unrealistic odds. Immigration restrains itself, to uproot yourself and build a new life elsewhere requires savvy and forethought and optimism and cunning.

Without syrian immigrant parents there's no Apple computers (Steve Jobs' parents). The dream of assimilation and emulating american values is what sinters people of various ethnicities into one american polity. I dont see balkanization, anyone who has worked in the kitchen of a restaurant understands how people who even lack a common tongue suddenly can work together and get along as friends and bullshxt and crack jokes and be a part of a team. The trick it to recognize you as a white guy are not part of Team White but Team America. That is what we best promote, that is what the Statue of Liberty's promise is, that's the preamble to the document that founds our country, that all people are created with the same god given right to live free and work their ass off to achieve happiness.

There's nothing particularly special about being white and american. They weren't even here first. Don't get 'dibs'. I guess the fear may be that since whitefolks rolled in and took people's stuff there may be karmic payback and pale folks ought to worry, but look next to you at Induveca to understand just because a guy is browner doesn't necessarily mean he wants to take YOUR stuff, unless you're his competitor in business and then hell, just work harder than him. and be better than him.

(And isn't that what merit is all about. If white folks are better and smarter than other folks, why handicap the competition in their favor, or whatnot. If they become americans and are better and smarter then team america is stronger by their addition).

Its up to you to buy into identity politics or not. You needn't be forced into it. Just recognize what is best for you is the common good. Everybody wants a good income to provide for their family. Good health. Worthy work that doesn't kill you. And a basic freedom from fear. Knowing that you can have a great conversation with a pakistani Uber driver or an Estonian strongman or whatever a huge thighed dentist who dates Love-A-Bulls.

Our country often finds new sources of revenue that did not exist before even when other resources begin to dwindle. Manufacturing goes elsewhere but Silicon Valley grows. Jazz. Walt Disney. Hollywood. Comic Books. Hiphop. Basketball (pardon me Canadians, yeah we stole it, but so did Bill Gates steal every good idea he ever saw). But we did so BECAUSE of that plurality. Basketball is an example of multibillion dollar business that would not thrive if we still only allowed pale folk to turn pro.

Who knows where the next revolution comes from (drone piloted small goods delivery, revolutionizing the trip to the store. Biotech farming growing replacement human organs in bioengineered sheep). But if we slam the doors on hard working people who see us as a beacon of opportunity , then we lose out on the worlds best and brightest, simply because of an accident of birth origin. Many of whom are not even born yet. And somewhere else will benefit from it. We'll be looking at the ass end of Brazil, or Mexico or who knows where.

The dominant culture isn't ethnic origin. Or even white skin. Its the American Dream: as stated in our founding documents: "If you work really hard you can get newer cooler stuff as soon as it hits the market. Fxck yeah, America !!!!!!".

Amen, Thomas Jefferson, couldnt have said it better myself.

Doc, the error you are making is your use of anecdotes. Of course there are millions of successful immigrants who are nice people, good entrepreneurs and successfully integrate into American culture. Furthermore, I'm assuming you are an upper middle class, educated person yourself, so, in the circles you travel, the immigrants you run into are far more likely to be upper middle class educated individuals. Well, the upper middle class educated immigrants are precisely the ones who are more likely to integrate and be successful. Your sampling is not representative.

I'm making my argument based on statistics, not anecdotes. The fact is, the vast majority of racial minorities, particularly those from the third world, do indeed vote and behave according to their racial identity. Taking Trump out of the equation, we can look at the exit polling data from 2012. Mitt Romney was the nicest, most milquetoast Republican one can ever expect our system to produce, yet blacks voted against him 93-7, Hispanics voted against him 71-29, Asians voted against him 73-27, Muslims voted against him 89-11. If we could break that down economic groups, I would bet that for those earning less than $50,000 per household, the percentage favoring Democrats and opposing Republicans would be above 90 for all groups. That's identity politics.

And patterns of racial identity don't just show up in voting statistics, they show up in housing:
Canada: As immigration booms, ethnic enclaves swell and segregate
Mexican immigrants experience very low rates of economic and civic assimilation.
Research suggests that when most whites or blacks move, they find another neighborhood where most of the people share their race.

It shows up in education:
California’s Latino students among the most segregated in the country, says UCLA report
California State University has announced that it will provide segregated housing for the university’s black students
African-American and Latino students are less likely to attend racially and ethnically diverse schools today than at any other time in the last four decades.

And it shows up in church congregations:
Sunday morning is the most segregated hour of Christian America
Only between 5 to 7.5 percent of churches in the U.S. are considered to be racially diverse
Churches are 10 times more segregated than the neighborhoods they inhabit

It shows up in societal trust:
Six-in-ten whites (62%) say they trust all or most of their neighbors, compared with 31% of blacks and 27% of Hispanics.
Diversity causes a decline in social cohesion
As schools get more diverse, kids just tend to self-segregate more

That last link is particularly illuminating:
They found that black kids who self-segregate ─ who only hang out with other blacks ─ are more popular than black kids who have white friends.

This means that an average black student could increase her popularity by hanging out with other black students. Meanwhile, if she chooses to have white friends, she could put her popularity at risk. Many kids don’t have the social capital or confidence to make this tradeoff.

When the scholars ran the analysis a second time,substituting how much kids were liked for how popular they were, a similar troubling pattern emerged. Black kids who self-segregated were liked by more black children. Having white friends decreased a black child’s “likeability” ─ at least in the eyes of other black children.

For white children, in contrast, self-segregating hurt their popularity.


Generally speaking, people of the same race prefer to be among other people of the same race. And these trends are stronger among minorities and the poor. Importing more poor minorities is not a good way to foster interracial relations and societal trust. And there is very little evidence that the situation is improving.
Ruzious
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 47,909
And1: 11,582
Joined: Jul 17, 2001
       

Re: Political Roundtable Part XII 

Post#1143 » by Ruzious » Sun Feb 5, 2017 6:57 pm

dckingsfan wrote:
Ruzious wrote:
dckingsfan wrote:More reporters than protesters :)

Knuckleheads.

It's not funny. Knuckleheads is what you call harmless people who do silly things. It only takes one moron to come in there with a rifle and kill people. That's not a hysterical reaction - that's what happened at that same restaurant. And one extremely loud protester with a bunch of his lovely buddies - like in that video - makes it very uncomfortable for a large group of people.

I thought the point of a protest is to make people uncomfortable.

I don't advocate violence in any way, shape or form. Why do you equate my post with acceptance of violence?

Huh??? You took a giant leap there. Where did I come anywhere near saying or implying I equate your post with acceptance of violence? What I said what it wasn't funny, and laughing about it wasn't appropriate.

If you think that protest was fine and dandy, there's not much we're going to agree on.
"A common mistake that people make when trying to design something completely foolproof is to underestimate the ingenuity of complete fools." - Douglas Adams
Dat2U
RealGM
Posts: 24,160
And1: 7,931
Joined: Jun 23, 2001
Location: Columbus, OH
       

Re: Political Roundtable Part XII 

Post#1144 » by Dat2U » Sun Feb 5, 2017 7:43 pm

nate33 wrote:
Dat2U wrote:
dckingsfan wrote: :nonono: Then the haters use that to retaliate and of we go... sigh.


You missed my point. I'm not advocating violence in response to the hate they spew. I'm saying a consequence of being a hate-monger is that karma will come back their way. What goes around comes around.

Milo especially is walking a dangerous line. Gaining fame by consistently insulting others will always have a negative chain reaction. It seems like he's on a chase to be a martyr for the alt right movement.

When has Milo ever supported or incited violence of any kind? Milo, of all people, is pretty phucking far from being a Nazi. He's a gay Jewish Libertarian who tirelessly advocates for free speech.

Many on the Left are condoning violence against "Nazi's" and then defining anybody they don't agree with as a Nazi. Do you not see the end result of this?

If you really believe that the tactics espoused by the Antifa left are going to be effective for the Left, for liberals or for Democrats, you're in for a huge letdown.


He advocates hate speech as free speech. He doesn't implicitly support violence but his words often incite it. You can't expect folks to idly stand by and except the wretched things he says and not expect some type of retribution.
popper
Veteran
Posts: 2,865
And1: 402
Joined: Jun 19, 2010

Re: Political Roundtable Part XII 

Post#1145 » by popper » Sun Feb 5, 2017 8:15 pm

Dat2U wrote:
nate33 wrote:
Dat2U wrote:
You missed my point. I'm not advocating violence in response to the hate they spew. I'm saying a consequence of being a hate-monger is that karma will come back their way. What goes around comes around.

Milo especially is walking a dangerous line. Gaining fame by consistently insulting others will always have a negative chain reaction. It seems like he's on a chase to be a martyr for the alt right movement.

When has Milo ever supported or incited violence of any kind? Milo, of all people, is pretty phucking far from being a Nazi. He's a gay Jewish Libertarian who tirelessly advocates for free speech.

Many on the Left are condoning violence against "Nazi's" and then defining anybody they don't agree with as a Nazi. Do you not see the end result of this?

If you really believe that the tactics espoused by the Antifa left are going to be effective for the Left, for liberals or for Democrats, you're in for a huge letdown.


He advocates hate speech as free speech. He doesn't implicitly support violence but his words often incite it. You can't expect folks to idly stand by and except the wretched things he says and not expect some type of retribution.


I've never heard a Milo speech so I'm asking out of ignorance and curiosity; what does he say that is hateful and inciteful of violence?
DCZards
RealGM
Posts: 11,150
And1: 4,998
Joined: Jul 16, 2005
Location: The Streets of DC
     

Re: Political Roundtable Part XII 

Post#1146 » by DCZards » Sun Feb 5, 2017 9:17 pm

nate33 wrote:

I'm making my argument based on statistics, not anecdotes. The fact is, the vast majority of racial minorities, particularly those from the third world, do indeed vote and behave according to their racial identity. Taking Trump out of the equation, we can look at the exit polling data from 2012. Mitt Romney was the nicest, most milquetoast Republican one can ever expect our system to produce, yet blacks voted against him 93-7, Hispanics voted against him 71-29, Asians voted against him 73-27, Muslims voted against him 89-11. If we could break that down economic groups, I would bet that for those earning less than $50,000 per household, the percentage favoring Democrats and opposing Republicans would be above 90 for all groups. That's identity politics.


Maybe you should give black and Hispanic voters a little credit for voting on the basis of politics rather than "racial identity." This may come as a surprise to you, but the policies and positions of Democrats are far more popular with racial minorities than those of the Republicans. Mitt Romney being the "nicest, most milquetoast Republican" didn't mitigate the fact that his positions/policies were those of a typical Republican. Republicans are losing the minority vote based on politics, not race.

nate33 wrote:Generally speaking, people of the same race prefer to be among other people of the same race. And these trends are stronger among minorities and the poor. Importing more poor minorities is not a good way to foster interracial relations and societal trust. And there is very little evidence that the situation is improving.


America's racial majority, white people, are the founders and leading purveyors of racial segregation and identity politics. So why would it not permeate the rest of the country.
payitforward
RealGM
Posts: 24,747
And1: 9,166
Joined: May 02, 2012
Location: On the Atlantic

Re: Political Roundtable Part XII 

Post#1147 » by payitforward » Sun Feb 5, 2017 9:51 pm

I'd be curious to know when we started viewing education as job-training, when we started thinking about the educational system as preparing people to get "better jobs."

Traditionally, I believe, the public education system has been viewed in the light of the need to create an informed, thinking citizenry -- capable of maintaining a democracy. I wonder whether, even now, educational theorists view schooling as job-training.

Don't get me wrong -- I'm not suggesting that public education is succeeding in this other goal! Nor am I suggesting that "informed, thinking" people would be less apt to do well economically than ignorant people.

And, in fact, it's true that mass literacy is a 20th-century phenomenon and was driven by the rise of the factory system & the need to be able to read in order to function at all in a modern economy. But I wonder whether there's possibly some confusion between causes & effects here. Perhaps it's the economic changes, the decline in those kinds of jobs, that leads to declines in educational levels -- rather than the reverse?

At the same time, however, the % of college-educated factory workers is rising not falling.... I remember Ruzious (I think) posting a chart to that effect last August I believe. In that case, the data was graphed differently: it was intended to show that increased education levels were no longer leading to increased income.

Ruz posted it, if I remember rightly, as a way of showing the reasons behind white working class disaffection. Of course, graph the same data differently, and it can be used to claim educational progress: viz. even factory workers now have college degrees (i.e. in increasing numbers...).

Above all, public education is what people sometimes call a "wicked problem." It's hard to grab one or a few variables, change them, and point to significantly improved results. Rather the nature of the thing than an indictment, I'd say.
payitforward
RealGM
Posts: 24,747
And1: 9,166
Joined: May 02, 2012
Location: On the Atlantic

Re: Political Roundtable Part XII 

Post#1148 » by payitforward » Sun Feb 5, 2017 10:01 pm

One of the problems in understanding literacy & its growth is -- what is the test? Another is -- who's being tested?

E.g. in 1800, it was claimed that the literacy level in England was 50%. But... the test was: can you write your name in town roll. If yes, you were counted as literate. & who was tested was males only; few women were able to read. Were peasants in the countryside tested/counted? Who knows.

(note: "1800" & "50%" are from memory & may be off; this doesn't affect my point)
payitforward
RealGM
Posts: 24,747
And1: 9,166
Joined: May 02, 2012
Location: On the Atlantic

Re: Political Roundtable Part XII 

Post#1149 » by payitforward » Sun Feb 5, 2017 10:04 pm

payitforward wrote:One of the problems in understanding literacy & its growth is -- what is the test? Another is -- who's being tested?

E.g. in 1800, it was claimed that the literacy level in England was 50%. But... the test was: can you write your name in town roll. If yes, you were counted as literate. & who was tested was males only; few women were able to read. Were peasants in the countryside tested/counted? Who knows.

(note: "1800" & "50%" are from memory & may be off; this doesn't affect my point)

&, I forgot to mention, graphs of %s of literacy over time will be skewed by changes in the test & in who's being tested!
popper
Veteran
Posts: 2,865
And1: 402
Joined: Jun 19, 2010

Re: Political Roundtable Part XII 

Post#1150 » by popper » Sun Feb 5, 2017 10:18 pm

payitforward wrote:
payitforward wrote:One of the problems in understanding literacy & its growth is -- what is the test? Another is -- who's being tested?

E.g. in 1800, it was claimed that the literacy level in England was 50%. But... the test was: can you write your name in town roll. If yes, you were counted as literate. & who was tested was males only; few women were able to read. Were peasants in the countryside tested/counted? Who knows.

(note: "1800" & "50%" are from memory & may be off; this doesn't affect my point)

&, I forgot to mention, graphs of %s of literacy over time will be skewed by changes in the test & in who's being tested!


I have textbooks and classroom tests from the 1940's that indicate to me that our public education system back then was much more rigorous than it is today. Latin, geography, poetry ...... not sure how that connects to your posts PIF but it seems it might.
Dat2U
RealGM
Posts: 24,160
And1: 7,931
Joined: Jun 23, 2001
Location: Columbus, OH
       

Re: Political Roundtable Part XII 

Post#1151 » by Dat2U » Sun Feb 5, 2017 10:46 pm

popper wrote:
Dat2U wrote:
nate33 wrote:When has Milo ever supported or incited violence of any kind? Milo, of all people, is pretty phucking far from being a Nazi. He's a gay Jewish Libertarian who tirelessly advocates for free speech.

Many on the Left are condoning violence against "Nazi's" and then defining anybody they don't agree with as a Nazi. Do you not see the end result of this?

If you really believe that the tactics espoused by the Antifa left are going to be effective for the Left, for liberals or for Democrats, you're in for a huge letdown.


He advocates hate speech as free speech. He doesn't implicitly support violence but his words often incite it. You can't expect folks to idly stand by and except the wretched things he says and not expect some type of retribution.


I've never heard a Milo speech so I'm asking out of ignorance and curiosity; what does he say that is hateful and inciteful of violence?


Google is your friend. I find it a bit disingenuous that I'm being asked to explain the garbage he spews.
montestewart
Forum Mod - Wizards
Forum Mod - Wizards
Posts: 14,815
And1: 7,940
Joined: Feb 25, 2009

Re: Political Roundtable Part XII 

Post#1152 » by montestewart » Sun Feb 5, 2017 11:32 pm

popper wrote:
payitforward wrote:
payitforward wrote:One of the problems in understanding literacy & its growth is -- what is the test? Another is -- who's being tested?

E.g. in 1800, it was claimed that the literacy level in England was 50%. But... the test was: can you write your name in town roll. If yes, you were counted as literate. & who was tested was males only; few women were able to read. Were peasants in the countryside tested/counted? Who knows.

(note: "1800" & "50%" are from memory & may be off; this doesn't affect my point)

&, I forgot to mention, graphs of %s of literacy over time will be skewed by changes in the test & in who's being tested!


I have textbooks and classroom tests from the 1940's that indicate to me that our public education system back then was much more rigorous than it is today. Latin, geography, poetry ...... not sure how that connects to your posts PIF but it seems it might.

I have my teacher's note to my parents from the 1920s. Mrs. DeMarco repeatedly misspelled "bastard"
popper
Veteran
Posts: 2,865
And1: 402
Joined: Jun 19, 2010

Re: Political Roundtable Part XII 

Post#1153 » by popper » Mon Feb 6, 2017 1:45 am

Dat2U wrote:
popper wrote:
Dat2U wrote:
He advocates hate speech as free speech. He doesn't implicitly support violence but his words often incite it. You can't expect folks to idly stand by and except the wretched things he says and not expect some type of retribution.


I've never heard a Milo speech so I'm asking out of ignorance and curiosity; what does he say that is hateful and inciteful of violence?


Google is your friend. I find it a bit disingenuous that I'm being asked to explain the garbage he spews.


Didn't ask you explain it Dat. Just asked you to cite his quotes that support your opinion that he advocates hate speech or incitement of violence. Not sure what's disengenous about that but maybe I'm missing something.
popper
Veteran
Posts: 2,865
And1: 402
Joined: Jun 19, 2010

Re: Political Roundtable Part XII 

Post#1154 » by popper » Mon Feb 6, 2017 1:48 am

montestewart wrote:
popper wrote:
payitforward wrote:&, I forgot to mention, graphs of %s of literacy over time will be skewed by changes in the test & in who's being tested!


I have textbooks and classroom tests from the 1940's that indicate to me that our public education system back then was much more rigorous than it is today. Latin, geography, poetry ...... not sure how that connects to your posts PIF but it seems it might.

I have my teacher's note to my parents from the 1920s. Mrs. DeMarco repeatedly misspelled "bastard"


Mrs DeMarco is a hateful b*tch.
Wizardspride
RealGM
Posts: 17,382
And1: 11,563
Joined: Nov 05, 2004
Location: Olney, MD/Kailua/Kaneohe, HI
       

Re: Political Roundtable Part XII 

Post#1155 » by Wizardspride » Mon Feb 6, 2017 3:08 am

Read on Twitter

President Donald Trump referred to African countries, Haiti and El Salvador as "shithole" nations during a meeting Thursday and asked why the U.S. can't have more immigrants from Norway.
dckingsfan
RealGM
Posts: 34,956
And1: 20,477
Joined: May 28, 2010

Re: Political Roundtable Part XII 

Post#1156 » by dckingsfan » Mon Feb 6, 2017 1:42 pm

Ruzious wrote:
dckingsfan wrote:
Ruzious wrote:It's not funny. Knuckleheads is what you call harmless people who do silly things. It only takes one moron to come in there with a rifle and kill people. That's not a hysterical reaction - that's what happened at that same restaurant. And one extremely loud protester with a bunch of his lovely buddies - like in that video - makes it very uncomfortable for a large group of people.

I thought the point of a protest is to make people uncomfortable.

I don't advocate violence in any way, shape or form. Why do you equate my post with acceptance of violence?

Huh??? You took a giant leap there. Where did I come anywhere near saying or implying I equate your post with acceptance of violence? What I said what it wasn't funny, and laughing about it wasn't appropriate.

If you think that protest was fine and dandy, there's not much we're going to agree on.

Okay, where did I laugh about it? Where did I say it was funny?

I assume in their particular case you feel that they shouldn't be allowed to do what they did. Given that and if you were the "authorities" on what basis would you arrest them. Based upon what they said?

I do not agree with them one little bit. But, there is a fine line when you start to restrict free speech. If we are going to do so, there should be a really good argument.
dckingsfan
RealGM
Posts: 34,956
And1: 20,477
Joined: May 28, 2010

Re: Political Roundtable Part XII 

Post#1157 » by dckingsfan » Mon Feb 6, 2017 1:50 pm

payitforward wrote:I'd be curious to know when we started viewing education as job-training, when we started thinking about the educational system as preparing people to get "better jobs."

That is a great question. When the original arguments over having a Department of Education were being argued (it was blocked for a long time as being unconstitutional (and that argument was never settled)), one of the reasons was that having the federal government in education (vs. states) involved would help us competitively.

Part of their mission: to promote student achievement and preparation for global competitiveness.

I think they have failed their mission pretty spectacularly :)
dckingsfan
RealGM
Posts: 34,956
And1: 20,477
Joined: May 28, 2010

Re: Political Roundtable Part XII 

Post#1158 » by dckingsfan » Mon Feb 6, 2017 1:55 pm

payitforward wrote:Traditionally, I believe, the public education system has been viewed in the light of the need to create an informed, thinking citizenry -- capable of maintaining a democracy. I wonder whether, even now, educational theorists view schooling as job-training.

This was indeed the thinking from the founders. They also felt it a states issue - it has morphed over time.

And I would posit that it doesn't matter what educational theorists care about any longer... it is now dominated by the "Education Industry".
Ruzious
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 47,909
And1: 11,582
Joined: Jul 17, 2001
       

Re: Political Roundtable Part XII 

Post#1159 » by Ruzious » Mon Feb 6, 2017 2:29 pm

dckingsfan wrote:
Ruzious wrote:
dckingsfan wrote:I thought the point of a protest is to make people uncomfortable.

I don't advocate violence in any way, shape or form. Why do you equate my post with acceptance of violence?

Huh??? You took a giant leap there. Where did I come anywhere near saying or implying I equate your post with acceptance of violence? What I said what it wasn't funny, and laughing about it wasn't appropriate.

If you think that protest was fine and dandy, there's not much we're going to agree on.

Okay, where did I laugh about it? Where did I say it was funny?

I assume in their particular case you feel that they shouldn't be allowed to do what they did. Given that and if you were the "authorities" on what basis would you arrest them. Based upon what they said?

I do not agree with them one little bit. But, there is a fine line when you start to restrict free speech. If we are going to do so, there should be a really good argument.

It seems to me you're intentionally completely mis-understanding what I've been saying, because I know you're not that stupid, so I'm ending this conversation.
"A common mistake that people make when trying to design something completely foolproof is to underestimate the ingenuity of complete fools." - Douglas Adams
Zonkerbl
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 9,071
And1: 4,756
Joined: Mar 24, 2010
       

Re: Political Roundtable Part XII 

Post#1160 » by Zonkerbl » Mon Feb 6, 2017 3:35 pm

I've been taught all my life to value service to the weak and powerless.

Return to Washington Wizards