SUPERBALLMAN wrote:sfam wrote:closg00 wrote:Nonsense. If development were 80-85% (you arrive at this % how?) on the player, then why-bother having a Player Development position? (Tapscott).
The A-list NBA organizations have a rigorous player development program which includes the increased usage of a single-affiliation or shared NBDL team. The Wizards don't bother with either.
This is the most obvious change I'd like to see from the franchise. They need only to look at the Nationals for an example of spending money on player development.
This has been a perplexing and maddening aspect of Leonsis' ownership. When he took over he announced intentions of using the Dleague.
I have posted many times, and it actually confounds me that the Wizards have yet to see the wisdom in the following proposal...
Establish their own single-affiliation Dleague team. The Baltimore Bullets.
They already have the name rights. They can sell new Bullets merchandise. They can promote and sell the team to B'more, a huge basketball city. Have their own coach in place, their own system, easily monitored and scouted by the parent club at close proximity. Someone like Cassell who might be a coach in waiting can go up and be the head guy for a year. If they need healthy players to practice (a common yearly issue) and/or scrimmage they are a short drive away. Players like Vesely or Singleton can get pt there and come back at a moments notice. Rehabbing players not quite back up to NBA quality can go up there and play a couple games and get their legs and game speed back. Etc etc.
+41
TOTALLY Agree. Why oh why won't Ted do that? That's both marketing and player development genius!
















