LOL...!
You really are kinda comical, kid.
What are you a racist , don't call elder men ..... a kid .....don't call anybody here a kid ,thats not your right to namecall like your uneducated and don't know how to talk .
Moderators: LyricalRico, nate33, montestewart
LOL...!
You really are kinda comical, kid.
AFM wrote:To be fair PIF is so old we are all kids to him
AFM wrote:To be fair PIF is so old we are all kids to him
doclinkin wrote:AFM wrote:To be fair PIF is so old we are all kids to him
If you read the Bible carefully you can find PIF in Exodus trying to convince Moses to trade the 10th commandment for the 26th 28th and a prophet to be named later.
Dat2U wrote:Its funny when you consider that Jordan Goodwin has been everything we were expecting or hoping Delon Wright would be. It creates an interesting rotation decision when Delon returns. There's no way you bench Jordan Goodwin I'd hope. I'd like to see Wright/Goodwin split the PG minutes and slide Monte to backup SG. Kispert can get the backup SF minutes. Barton gets bounced from the rotation.
But since Barton has been an incredibly strong and consistent tank commander, I'm more than fine with him keeping his minutes.
payitforward wrote:Dat2U wrote:Its funny when you consider that Jordan Goodwin has been everything we were expecting or hoping Delon Wright would be. It creates an interesting rotation decision when Delon returns. There's no way you bench Jordan Goodwin I'd hope. I'd like to see Wright/Goodwin split the PG minutes and slide Monte to backup SG. Kispert can get the backup SF minutes. Barton gets bounced from the rotation.
But since Barton has been an incredibly strong and consistent tank commander, I'm more than fine with him keeping his minutes.
Yeah... there is a terrible contradiction facing the Wizards fan....
But, if we're acting like fans in a normal year, I don't want to move Monte to the back up 2. Either Monte or Delon has to go -- it's just about who gets us the better return.
I just posted a suggested trade in the appropriate thread....
payitforward wrote:doclinkin wrote:AFM wrote:To be fair PIF is so old we are all kids to him
If you read the Bible carefully you can find PIF in Exodus trying to convince Moses to trade the 10th commandment for the 26th 28th and a prophet to be named later.
For the possibly 1 poster on this board, if there even is 1, who is even vaguely familiar with the 10th commandment, I fear I must admit that when I was a much younger man I did have some occasional problems with the "thy neighbor's wife" part of that one....
dckingsfan wrote:payitforward wrote:Dat2U wrote:Its funny when you consider that Jordan Goodwin has been everything we were expecting or hoping Delon Wright would be. It creates an interesting rotation decision when Delon returns. There's no way you bench Jordan Goodwin I'd hope. I'd like to see Wright/Goodwin split the PG minutes and slide Monte to backup SG. Kispert can get the backup SF minutes. Barton gets bounced from the rotation.
But since Barton has been an incredibly strong and consistent tank commander, I'm more than fine with him keeping his minutes.
Yeah... there is a terrible contradiction facing the Wizards fan....
But, if we're acting like fans in a normal year, I don't want to move Monte to the back up 2. Either Monte or Delon has to go -- it's just about who gets us the better return.
I just posted a suggested trade in the appropriate thread....
I would like us to have the Wright/Goodwin PG rotation next year. So... I would like to see Morris be the one that is moved.
doclinkin wrote:payitforward wrote:doclinkin wrote:
If you read the Bible carefully you can find PIF in Exodus trying to convince Moses to trade the 10th commandment for the 26th 28th and a prophet to be namedj later.
For the possibly 1 poster on this board, if there even is 1, who is even vaguely familiar with the 10th commandment, I fear I must admit that when I was a much younger man I did have some occasional problems with the "thy neighbor's wife" part of that one....
Okay a *wife* to be named later.

payitforward wrote:dckingsfan wrote:payitforward wrote:Yeah... there is a terrible contradiction facing the Wizards fan....
But, if we're acting like fans in a normal year, I don't want to move Monte to the back up 2. Either Monte or Delon has to go -- it's just about who gets us the better return.
I just posted a suggested trade in the appropriate thread....
I would like us to have the Wright/Goodwin PG rotation next year. So... I would like to see Morris be the one that is moved.
I have 3 responses to this, although I think that in the end they amount to the same thing:
1. We're a bottom-dweller. We're one of the worst teams in the league. What possible difference does it make what our PG rotation is next year? We're going to win 30-plus-a-few games next year no matter what our PG rotation.
2. Keep Wright & move Morris instead of the opposite? Sure, why not? I mean... makes no nevermind, but at least someone's happy!
3. Who we move & who we keep should depend on what we're offered for either of these players. Not that it's likely to wind up making a difference unless it's part of a far larger set of changes -- i.e. a plan to rebuild & an actual concern for / commitment to winning.
payitforward wrote:dckingsfan wrote:payitforward wrote:Yeah... there is a terrible contradiction facing the Wizards fan....
But, if we're acting like fans in a normal year, I don't want to move Monte to the back up 2. Either Monte or Delon has to go -- it's just about who gets us the better return.
I just posted a suggested trade in the appropriate thread....
I would like us to have the Wright/Goodwin PG rotation next year. So... I would like to see Morris be the one that is moved.
I have 3 responses to this, although I think that in the end they amount to the same thing:
1. We're a bottom-dweller. We're one of the worst teams in the league. What possible difference does it make what our PG rotation is next year? We're going to win 30-plus-a-few games next year no matter what our PG rotation.
2. Keep Wright & move Morris instead of the opposite? Sure, why not? I mean... makes no nevermind, but at least someone's happy!
3. Who we move & who we keep should depend on what we're offered for either of these players. Not that it's likely to wind up making a difference unless it's part of a far larger set of changes -- i.e. a plan to rebuild & an actual concern for / commitment to winning.
Houston would like to move Eric Gordon -- who can blame them?Could we give them either Morris or Wright plus Kuzma & Rui in return for Gordon's corpse plus Tari Eason & Kenyon Martin Jr.? Or, if not Eason then substitute Usman Garuba?
We suffer with Gordon through next season. But, I remind you that we are on target to win 31 games this year. We wouldn't do worse based on this trade, & our future would be a good deal brighter.
nate33 wrote:payitforward wrote:dckingsfan wrote:I would like us to have the Wright/Goodwin PG rotation next year. So... I would like to see Morris be the one that is moved.
I have 3 responses to this, although I think that in the end they amount to the same thing:
1. We're a bottom-dweller. We're one of the worst teams in the league. What possible difference does it make what our PG rotation is next year? We're going to win 30-plus-a-few games next year no matter what our PG rotation.
2. Keep Wright & move Morris instead of the opposite? Sure, why not? I mean... makes no nevermind, but at least someone's happy!
3. Who we move & who we keep should depend on what we're offered for either of these players. Not that it's likely to wind up making a difference unless it's part of a far larger set of changes -- i.e. a plan to rebuild & an actual concern for / commitment to winning.
Agree with this.
I like Wright more than Morris, but neither guy is part of our future so we should be open to trading either or both.
Frankly, there is nobody on the roster that I like well enough that I wouldn't trade. The only guys that I have any irrational attachment to are Deni and Goodwin. I'd part with anyone else in a fair value trade. With those 2, you might have to give me something slightly better than fair value to part with them.
payitforward wrote:Makes sense....
But, of course, if you trade bad players for fair value, I am sure I don't need to tell you what you get!
We really can't trade in order to become better this year or next year. We can trade to increase the possibility of becoming better two or three years from now.
That idea was the basis for the move I suggested in the trade thread:Houston would like to move Eric Gordon -- who can blame them?Could we give them either Morris or Wright plus Kuzma & Rui in return for Gordon's corpse plus Tari Eason & Kenyon Martin Jr.? Or, if not Eason then substitute Usman Garuba?
We suffer with Gordon through next season. But, I remind you that we are on target to win 31 games this year. We wouldn't do worse based on this trade, & our future would be a good deal brighter.
No one has taken up this idea (nor should we discuss it in this thread). Kind of makes me wonder if there isn't some kind of delusional belief that having acquired KP we can somehow actually become "good" (or at least meaningfully better than we have been) in the short term.
As tleikheen has pointed out, a team that isn't likely to make a deep playoff run any time soon should be ready to trade present assets for ones that will bear fruit down the road.