Severn Hoos wrote:Listened to Colin Cowherd this morning....
You lost me there.
You are to blame for anything that happened between this sentence and you changing the station.

Moderators: LyricalRico, nate33, montestewart
Severn Hoos wrote:Listened to Colin Cowherd this morning....
gambitx777 wrote:We would have swept with wall! hands down! I say sit him game 5, game for literally could have been won by gortat and otto having an averge game. they had a rough night and we had some bad rolls. if we go down they see if wall can go for 6, if we win 5 sit him 6 and see if we can close it out with out him! if we go to game 7 see if we need him! But I don't think you drag him out with the series tied .
Severn Hoos wrote:Perfect example of a guy who made a statement in the past - that might even have had merit at the time he said it - and now feels he has to defend the statement, no matter how asinine it looks.
fishercob wrote:Severn Hoos wrote:Listened to Colin Cowherd this morning....
You lost me there.
You are to blame for anything that happened between this sentence and you changing the station.
CntOutSmrtCrazy wrote:From the ESPN 5-On-5:
2. Fact or Fiction: John Wall is a top-five point guard in the NBA.
Arnovitz: Fiction, and given the absurd depth at the position, there's no shame in falling just outside the top five. Steph Curry, Chris Paul and Russell Westbrook are locks until further notice, which places Wall in a scrum just below with Damian Lillard, Kyrie Irving, Mike Conley and, possibly, Jeff Teague, and the healthy versions of Tony Parker, Kyle Lowry and Derrick Rose. Wall's true shooting percentage of only 52.6 percent is below league average, which makes it tough to vault him into the top five.
Pelton: Fact. After the top three (Curry, Paul and Westbrook), it's mostly a matter of taste, and Wall's two-way play -- I picked him for my All-Defensive Second Team -- probably lifts him to the top of the crowded second tier at this point.
Strauss: Fact. This would be a more apparent fact if Wall played in an offensive system that made sense. He's already the best defensive player at his position, in my opinion. Once he's in a structure that encourages the shooting of 3-pointers in the regular season, Wall's star will rise.
Wallace: Fact. He has elevated himself this season into the elite group that consists of Curry, Paul, Westbrook and Parker. Sure, there may be debates as to whether you'd take Wall over Lillard, Conley or perhaps a healthy Rose. But Wall's work the past two seasons as a scorer and facilitator speaks for itself.
Young: Fact. You're probably trying to count off five better in your head right now. Let's see, Curry, Westbrook, Paul and ... maybe Conley? Maybe Lillard? Maybe Irving, if you're still counting him as a point guard for some reason? Wall is an unreal facilitator who blends size and power, and he has taken big steps with his jumper. Hard to think of five who are undoubtedly better.
Arnovitz you hack.
I’m sorry, John Wall.
I’m sorry that we rush to judgment. I’m sorry that we presume more than we have any right to. I’m sorry that we continue to conflate athletic performance with personal character. I’m sorry that Wall’s considerable professional accomplishments will always be linked with Cowherd’s inane monologue. I’m sorry that it requires an undeniably valiant Wall performance, taking the floor with five fractures in his wrist and hand, to spark pieces like this one.
But mostly, I’m sorry that we’re all so god-damn afraid to say, “I’m sorry.” It’s not weakness, it’s not frailty, and it’s not a lack of conviction. Sometimes, it’s just plain decent. And a little more decency wouldn’t be such a bad thing — from the halls of power in our nation’s capital, to every studio that puts a chucklehead in front of a microphone.
CntOutSmrtCrazy wrote:How did Kyrie get 112 votes and Wall only 50...