Whatever are you talking about, Hands? We have 4 players of any use at all that'll be with the team in 14 months. That's what we've achieved in 6 years of a rebuild. Speaking of which John Wall will be playing his
6th season, not his 5th, next year. He's almost half way through his NBA career. (Ok that's an exaggeration!

)
You talk about guys like Gooden and Pierce as if just having their names means they'll stay as they are for many a year. We're on a nice run right now, but we have traded much of our future for that run -- or at least we've done a poor job of acquiring young talent that can develop.
I can't figure out where you are on all this; it seems to change w/ whatever the current fortunes of the team are.
Now, I am enjoying our current success, and I hope we ride it a long way. And if we get lucky w/ draft picks this year and next all the better. But to compare us to Dallas? Yes, they too have a team that's too old and has questions. But they got a championship along the way, right?
Or, better yet, you want to say that because SAS may actually get to the end of their Duncan era, that means they're comparable to us in having roster problems?