ImageImageImageImageImage

Official Trade Thread XXII (2/6/13 - 4/1/13)

Moderators: nate33, montestewart, LyricalRico

User avatar
nate33
Forum Mod - Wizards
Forum Mod - Wizards
Posts: 71,543
And1: 24,210
Joined: Oct 28, 2002

Re: Official Trade Thread XXII (2/6/13 - present) 

Post#1261 » by nate33 » Tue Mar 12, 2013 7:37 pm

Ruzious wrote:I'd rather just re-sign Webster than trade for Hayward. And I'm not seeing a reason for Utah looking to trade him. If Utah lets both Milsap and Jefferson go for squatilydish, I think their GM loses his job.

Agreed. Hayward seems like a decent player, but he's not worth sacrificing anything significant to acquire. He's no better than Webster.
LyricalRico
Forum Mod - Wizards
Forum Mod - Wizards
Posts: 30,582
And1: 863
Joined: May 23, 2002
Location: Back into the fray!
Contact:
       

Re: Official Trade Thread XXII (2/6/13 - present) 

Post#1262 » by LyricalRico » Tue Mar 12, 2013 8:15 pm

^ Yeah, no picks for Heyward. But I'd give up Booker+Singleton.
nuposse04
RealGM
Posts: 11,344
And1: 2,501
Joined: Jul 20, 2004
Location: on a rock
   

Re: Official Trade Thread XXII (2/6/13 - present) 

Post#1263 » by nuposse04 » Tue Mar 12, 2013 8:26 pm

^if there goal was to truly suck for the '14 draft that would be a good way to go about it.
Dat2U
RealGM
Posts: 24,257
And1: 8,112
Joined: Jun 23, 2001
Location: Columbus, OH
       

Re: Official Trade Thread XXII (2/6/13 - present) 

Post#1264 » by Dat2U » Tue Mar 12, 2013 10:14 pm

My first Wall trade :-(

Wizards trade: G John Wall

Raptors trade: G Kyle Lowry, 2014 1st round pick (unprotected)

To goal is get a high 2014 pick to go along with our own. This would be a good way to do it. Toronto is still in denial about Gay. The may have hope for a Wall/Gay/Valanciunas core but it's likely to blow up in their faces.

At worst your looking at two top 10 picks for '14 to go along with a core of Lowry, Beal & '13 1st rounder.
User avatar
nate33
Forum Mod - Wizards
Forum Mod - Wizards
Posts: 71,543
And1: 24,210
Joined: Oct 28, 2002

Re: Official Trade Thread XXII (2/6/13 - present) 

Post#1265 » by nate33 » Tue Mar 12, 2013 11:15 pm

Dat2U wrote:My first Wall trade :-(

Wizards trade: G John Wall

Raptors trade: G Kyle Lowry, 2014 1st round pick (unprotected)

To goal is get a high 2014 pick to go along with our own. This would be a good way to do it. Toronto is still in denial about Gay. The may have hope for a Wall/Gay/Valanciunas core but it's likely to blow up in their faces.

At worst your looking at two top 10 picks for '14 to go along with a core of Lowry, Beal & '13 1st rounder.

I'd do that. Although you might be jumping the gun in assuming we finish poorly enough next year to end up in the top 10 of the draft again.
User avatar
willbcocks
Analyst
Posts: 3,698
And1: 382
Joined: Mar 17, 2003
Location: Wall-E has come to save Washington!

Re: Official Trade Thread XXII (2/6/13 - present) 

Post#1266 » by willbcocks » Tue Mar 12, 2013 11:45 pm

To me, the key part of any John Wall trade would be the 2014 tank. That means that we would have to move Nene as well, and not take back good players. Beal + 2013 lottery + 2014 high lottery + whatever we get for Wall would be a great foundation for a contending team.

I think there is zero stomach for such a plan among our FO, however, given what happened last year.
User avatar
gambitx777
RealGM
Posts: 10,637
And1: 2,017
Joined: Dec 18, 2012

Re: Official Trade Thread XXII (2/6/13 - present) 

Post#1267 » by gambitx777 » Wed Mar 13, 2013 2:45 am

Yeah our front office is a big massive pile of pussies!

I thought we should have tried to offer NENE to the nets at the dead line. i think they still might take him, but its less likely in the off season, and we might have lost our chance.

I do not really like that wall Toronto move much, I am not a big lowery fan, I would rather use wall to go after a young big. I do not think Noel is the right direction to go it. I am truly afraid that he will go the way of oden or even worse brown. I think if we can grab a solid young big, like Kanter, Monroue, or Thompson. and a pick this year and keep our pick i would be all for that. Then we can sell off NENE for what ever we can get because we would have gotten value you wall. Let okafur and ariza walk and we start fresh with a nice young team with a future of something greater than ok.
jivelikenice
Analyst
Posts: 3,074
And1: 145
Joined: Jul 15, 2005

Re: Official Trade Thread XXII (2/6/13 - present) 

Post#1268 » by jivelikenice » Wed Mar 13, 2013 4:23 am

Dat2U wrote:My first Wall trade :-(

Wizards trade: G John Wall

Raptors trade: G Kyle Lowry, 2014 1st round pick (unprotected)

To goal is get a high 2014 pick to go along with our own. This would be a good way to do it. Toronto is still in denial about Gay. The may have hope for a Wall/Gay/Valanciunas core but it's likely to blow up in their faces.

At worst your looking at two top 10 picks for '14 to go along with a core of Lowry, Beal & '13 1st rounder.


Gay is flawed but a core of Wall/Derozan/Gay/Amir Johnson/Valanciunas/Ross sounds like a 7th/8th seed
jivelikenice
Analyst
Posts: 3,074
And1: 145
Joined: Jul 15, 2005

Re: Official Trade Thread XXII (2/6/13 - present) 

Post#1269 » by jivelikenice » Wed Mar 13, 2013 4:28 am

nate33 wrote:
Ruzious wrote:I'd rather just re-sign Webster than trade for Hayward. And I'm not seeing a reason for Utah looking to trade him. If Utah lets both Milsap and Jefferson go for squatilydish, I think their GM loses his job.

Agreed. Hayward seems like a decent player, but he's not worth sacrificing anything significant to acquire. He's no better than Webster.


Would you consider a top 10 protected pick and someone like Sngleton anything significant? I think he's better than Webster. He's a solid shooter but is a better slasher with a more well rounded offensive game IMO. Plus he's 4 yrs younger....
User avatar
gambitx777
RealGM
Posts: 10,637
And1: 2,017
Joined: Dec 18, 2012

Re: Official Trade Thread XXII (2/6/13 - present) 

Post#1270 » by gambitx777 » Wed Mar 13, 2013 4:34 am

I would, because you are giving up a first round pick for some one with the skills that you can get if you make a good pick in the first round. It does not matter if you are picking 11th or 29th, if you pick well you can find good players. So giving up a pick with out getting a pick in return is just a bad move. IMO. Unless you are getting something really ground braking in return. Picks are two valuable to just be tossing around, even for a decent playing like G.H.
Ruzious
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 47,909
And1: 11,582
Joined: Jul 17, 2001
       

Re: Official Trade Thread XXII (2/6/13 - present) 

Post#1271 » by Ruzious » Wed Mar 13, 2013 8:36 am

jivelikenice wrote:
nate33 wrote:
Ruzious wrote:I'd rather just re-sign Webster than trade for Hayward. And I'm not seeing a reason for Utah looking to trade him. If Utah lets both Milsap and Jefferson go for squatilydish, I think their GM loses his job.

Agreed. Hayward seems like a decent player, but he's not worth sacrificing anything significant to acquire. He's no better than Webster.


Would you consider a top 10 protected pick and someone like Sngleton anything significant? I think he's better than Webster. He's a solid shooter but is a better slasher with a more well rounded offensive game IMO. Plus he's 4 yrs younger....

Put it this way - if you don't think you're offering much for Hayward, why would Utah make that trade?
"A common mistake that people make when trying to design something completely foolproof is to underestimate the ingenuity of complete fools." - Douglas Adams
jivelikenice
Analyst
Posts: 3,074
And1: 145
Joined: Jul 15, 2005

Re: Official Trade Thread XXII (2/6/13 - present) 

Post#1272 » by jivelikenice » Wed Mar 13, 2013 2:57 pm

^If they're looking to tank and take a step back for the purposes of reloading in the '14 draft, then a pick in the teens might be attractive to them. They're willingness to take on one of our recent selections would depend on what their FO scouts thought of them when they came out.
User avatar
FAH1223
RealGM
Posts: 16,496
And1: 7,587
Joined: Nov 01, 2005
Location: Laurel, MD
       

Re: Official Trade Thread XXII (2/6/13 - present) 

Post#1273 » by FAH1223 » Wed Mar 13, 2013 3:44 pm

jivelikenice wrote:^If they're looking to tank and take a step back for the purposes of reloading in the '14 draft, then a pick in the teens might be attractive to them. They're willingness to take on one of our recent selections would depend on what their FO scouts thought of them when they came out.


Utah is content letting Millsap and Jefferson walk. I think they prefer to keep one though. Kanter and Favors have to play big minutes next season for them as they need to see what they have in them. Favors will be a RFA after next season as well.

The Jazz never, I mean never, tank to the level of the Wizards. They aren't giving up young players unless they get something valuable back. Just look at their history. The Miller family isn't the Polins or Ted Leonsis. They actually care about being competitive and for them taking a step back would mean just being in the late end of the lottery.
Image
User avatar
stevemcqueen1
Lead Assistant
Posts: 4,588
And1: 1,137
Joined: Jan 25, 2013
     

Re: Official Trade Thread XXII (2/6/13 - present) 

Post#1274 » by stevemcqueen1 » Wed Mar 13, 2013 4:00 pm

If Utah is willing to let their two best players walk for nothing, go into the crapper for the hope they'll get some current high school player in next year's draft and he'll turn them into a championship contender, then it's time for ownership to clean house in the FO.
User avatar
Chocolate City Jordanaire
RealGM
Posts: 55,609
And1: 10,872
Joined: Aug 05, 2001
       

Re: Official Trade Thread XXII (2/6/13 - present) 

Post#1275 » by Chocolate City Jordanaire » Wed Mar 13, 2013 4:07 pm

Dat2U wrote:My first Wall trade :-(

Wizards trade: G John Wall

Raptors trade: G Kyle Lowry, 2014 1st round pick (unprotected)

To goal is get a high 2014 pick to go along with our own. This would be a good way to do it. Toronto is still in denial about Gay. The may have hope for a Wall/Gay/Valanciunas core but it's likely to blow up in their faces.

At worst your looking at two top 10 picks for '14 to go along with a core of Lowry, Beal & '13 1st rounder.


WELCOME TO THE DARK SIDE, DAT2U.

:starwars

Wow, March 12, 2013. Dat posts a John Wall trade. :o Where were you when ...

Certain dates are like milestones. Back in July 2007, I had a bad feeling with Tom Thibodeau backed out of becoming a Wizards assistant. I remembered that date because I had a feeling nothing good would come of that.

If Dat posts a John Wall trade that pretty much seals the deal in my mind. I'm shocked and surprised.

My thoughts are John is what he is, and they can maximize what they get for him right now OR they can try and build around him with a stretch four and a dynamic, go-to swing man. Otto Porter would be a godsend. Ultimately, however, I don't think John's a good leader and I'm not sure about his mind set. I think he's a good enough at-times great player who will probably improve somewhat around Beal, who is a true leader.

For my dime, I see some sharp guys in this draft and I think the Wizards would do VERY WELL with a trade like this one. Lowry and a 2014 first for John is darn near a no brainer IMO.
Dat2U
RealGM
Posts: 24,257
And1: 8,112
Joined: Jun 23, 2001
Location: Columbus, OH
       

Re: Official Trade Thread XXII (2/6/13 - present) 

Post#1276 » by Dat2U » Wed Mar 13, 2013 4:13 pm

stevemcqueen1 wrote:If Utah is willing to let their two best players walk for nothing, go into the crapper for the hope they'll get some current high school player in next year's draft and he'll turn them into a championship contender, then it's time for ownership to clean house in the FO.


Totally disagree. They have taken honest intake of what they are. A team fighting for a playoff spot so they can be a sacrificial lamb for a top seed in the West. Why would you possibly $100+ million (to resign AlJeff & Millsap) to keep that together? They've got two young talented high picks that they've brought along slowly at those same positions AlJeff & Millsap play. It's time to see what Favors & Kanter can do. So I have no problem with Utah deciding to reboot and focusing on a very strong draft and maintaining cap flexibility to make moves down the line.
jivelikenice
Analyst
Posts: 3,074
And1: 145
Joined: Jul 15, 2005

Re: Official Trade Thread XXII (2/6/13 - present) 

Post#1277 » by jivelikenice » Wed Mar 13, 2013 4:17 pm

Dat2U wrote:
stevemcqueen1 wrote:If Utah is willing to let their two best players walk for nothing, go into the crapper for the hope they'll get some current high school player in next year's draft and he'll turn them into a championship contender, then it's time for ownership to clean house in the FO.


Totally disagree. They have taken honest intake of what they are. A team fighting for a playoff spot so they can be a sacrificial lamb for a top seed in the West. Why would you possibly $100+ million (to resign AlJeff & Millsap) to keep that together? They've got two young talented high picks that they've brought along slowly at those same positions AlJeff & Millsap play. It's time to see what Favors & Kanter can do. So I have no problem with Utah deciding to reboot and focusing on a very strong draft and maintaining cap flexibility to make moves down the line.


That was my take on the article & why I thought if Gordon could be had for a protected '14 pick, it may be worth it. No big loss, but I think Gordon brings some good qualities to the table and can play both the 2/3....
User avatar
Chocolate City Jordanaire
RealGM
Posts: 55,609
And1: 10,872
Joined: Aug 05, 2001
       

Re: Official Trade Thread XXII (2/6/13 - present) 

Post#1278 » by Chocolate City Jordanaire » Wed Mar 13, 2013 4:20 pm

FAH1223 wrote:
jivelikenice wrote:^If they're looking to tank and take a step back for the purposes of reloading in the '14 draft, then a pick in the teens might be attractive to them. They're willingness to take on one of our recent selections would depend on what their FO scouts thought of them when they came out.


Utah is content letting Millsap and Jefferson walk. I think they prefer to keep one though. Kanter and Favors have to play big minutes next season for them as they need to see what they have in them. Favors will be a RFA after next season as well.

The Jazz never, I mean never, tank to the level of the Wizards. They aren't giving up young players unless they get something valuable back. Just look at their history. The Miller family isn't the Polins or Ted Leonsis. They actually care about being competitive and for them taking a step back would mean just being in the late end of the lottery.


I've never been a huge Al Jefferson fan, but I think he or Millsap in DC would be a lot of fun to watch. If Washington were to find a way to trade Okafor or Nene for Big Al, the Wizards could have a heck of a team improvement.

Nene's health is too precarious for me to see any way he's successfully moved. Okafor, however, has an attractive, expiring deal with an ETO.

Washington isn't getting Favors or Kanter unless they give up John Wall. I could, however see Millsap or Jefferson in DC if cap room opened up for Ariza and/or Okafor departing.
User avatar
Chocolate City Jordanaire
RealGM
Posts: 55,609
And1: 10,872
Joined: Aug 05, 2001
       

Re: Official Trade Thread XXII (2/6/13 - present) 

Post#1279 » by Chocolate City Jordanaire » Wed Mar 13, 2013 4:25 pm

Dat2U wrote:
stevemcqueen1 wrote:If Utah is willing to let their two best players walk for nothing, go into the crapper for the hope they'll get some current high school player in next year's draft and he'll turn them into a championship contender, then it's time for ownership to clean house in the FO.


Totally disagree. They have taken honest intake of what they are. A team fighting for a playoff spot so they can be a sacrificial lamb for a top seed in the West. Why would you possibly $100+ million (to resign AlJeff & Millsap) to keep that together? They've got two young talented high picks that they've brought along slowly at those same positions AlJeff & Millsap play. It's time to see what Favors & Kanter can do. So I have no problem with Utah deciding to reboot and focusing on a very strong draft and maintaining cap flexibility to make moves down the line.


It would be perfectly logical for Al Jefferson to back to Boston. The Celtics just have a few bad contracts they would need to move.

As it is, I think Houston will end up settling for Big Al Jefferson. He would really be good there, too.
Dat2U
RealGM
Posts: 24,257
And1: 8,112
Joined: Jun 23, 2001
Location: Columbus, OH
       

Re: Official Trade Thread XXII (2/6/13 - present) 

Post#1280 » by Dat2U » Wed Mar 13, 2013 4:27 pm

Chocolate City Jordanaire wrote:
Dat2U wrote:My first Wall trade :-(

Wizards trade: G John Wall

Raptors trade: G Kyle Lowry, 2014 1st round pick (unprotected)

To goal is get a high 2014 pick to go along with our own. This would be a good way to do it. Toronto is still in denial about Gay. The may have hope for a Wall/Gay/Valanciunas core but it's likely to blow up in their faces.

At worst your looking at two top 10 picks for '14 to go along with a core of Lowry, Beal & '13 1st rounder.


WELCOME TO THE DARK SIDE, DAT2U.

:starwars

Wow, March 12, 2013. Dat posts a John Wall trade. :o Where were you when ...

Certain dates are like milestones. Back in July 2007, I had a bad feeling with Tom Thibodeau backed out of becoming a Wizards assistant. I remembered that date because I had a feeling nothing good would come of that.

If Dat posts a John Wall trade that pretty much seals the deal in my mind. I'm shocked and surprised.

My thoughts are John is what he is, and they can maximize what they get for him right now OR they can try and build around him with a stretch four and a dynamic, go-to swing man. Otto Porter would be a godsend. Ultimately, however, I don't think John's a good leader and I'm not sure about his mind set. I think he's a good enough at-times great player who will probably improve somewhat around Beal, who is a true leader.

For my dime, I see some sharp guys in this draft and I think the Wizards would do VERY WELL with a trade like this one. Lowry and a 2014 first for John is darn near a no brainer IMO.


Actually i change my mind. :lol:

I wouldn't do the above trade, maybe I'm still in denial.

But this offer below, I would be tempted to do:

Wizards trade: G Wall, C Okafor, C Seraphin
Wizards receive: G Lowry, C Valanciunas, C Perkins & 2014 1st round pick - unprotected

Raptors trade: G Lowry, C Valanciunas & 2014 1st round pick - unprotected
Raptors receive: G Wall, C Collison, F Jones, 2013 1st round pick (own pick returned from OKC)

Thunder trade: C Perkins, C Collison, F Jones, 2013 1st round pick (TOR)
Thunder receive: C Okafor, C Seraphin

Return to Washington Wizards