ImageImageImageImageImage

Official Trade Thread - Part XXV

Moderators: LyricalRico, nate33, montestewart

User avatar
SUPERBALLMAN
Lead Assistant
Posts: 4,549
And1: 1,278
Joined: Aug 08, 2006
     

Re: Official Trade Thread - Part XXV 

Post#1261 » by SUPERBALLMAN » Tue Dec 24, 2013 1:16 am

TGW wrote:
nuposse04 wrote:
mhd wrote:To me, the obvious trade is Porter for Kanter (especially if Utah takes Embiied in the draft). The Jazz are souring on Kanter, and Porter gives them a young wing.

Kanter is the young big to groom, while Ariza, Webster, and Rice are the SFs to role with.


I'm anti many Porter trades but this is something I'd definitely try to go for.

Porter+Seraphin+'16 lotto protected 1st for Kanter. Maybe see if we can add Maynor just to do addition by subtraction and take a bad contract back.


That's a terrible trade. Kanter has looked bad this year—Porter should be enough.



Right, Porter straight up for Kanter works, and should be enough. Maybe stretch it out slightly to Porter, Seraphin, Maynor for Kanter and Lucas.

I'd hate to give up Porter this early, I still have high hopes for him... but this would certainly be worth considering.
"I love it when a plan comes together" - Colonel John "Hannibal" Smith
nuposse04
RealGM
Posts: 11,298
And1: 2,440
Joined: Jul 20, 2004
Location: on a rock
   

Re: Official Trade Thread - Part XXV 

Post#1262 » by nuposse04 » Tue Dec 24, 2013 5:55 am

Kanter has at least shown signs of being a promising young big in his first two season. Bigs always have more value then wing players. I like Porter a ton but he hasn't really produced anything yet, so it is a bit of a stretch to say Porter alone has equal value to Kanter. That wreaks of some homer ish. I might be over-valueing Kanter but Porter certainly alone would be difficult to acquire him with.
verbal8
General Manager
Posts: 8,353
And1: 1,377
Joined: Jul 20, 2006
Location: Herndon, VA
     

Re: Official Trade Thread - Part XXV 

Post#1263 » by verbal8 » Tue Dec 24, 2013 12:47 pm

nuposse04 wrote:Kanter has at least shown signs of being a promising young big in his first two season. Bigs always have more value then wing players. I like Porter a ton but he hasn't really produced anything yet, so it is a bit of a stretch to say Porter alone has equal value to Kanter. That wreaks of some homer ish. I might be over-valueing Kanter but Porter certainly alone would be difficult to acquire him with.


The thing is that Porter has 2 more years on his rookie deal than Kanter does. That might be a big selling point for Utah if they aren't sold on Kanter/Favors being their bigs of the future. Porter may also be insurance if Hayward gets an offer the Jazz don't want to match.
User avatar
kirubel94
Sophomore
Posts: 249
And1: 11
Joined: Feb 16, 2010

Re: Official Trade Thread - Part XXV 

Post#1264 » by kirubel94 » Tue Dec 24, 2013 6:07 pm

How about this, Alex Len for Otto. Len hasn't played much due to Injuries and the emergence of Miles Plumlee.
Ruzious
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 47,909
And1: 11,582
Joined: Jul 17, 2001
       

Re: Official Trade Thread - Part XXV 

Post#1265 » by Ruzious » Tue Dec 24, 2013 6:11 pm

verbal8 wrote:
nuposse04 wrote:Kanter has at least shown signs of being a promising young big in his first two season. Bigs always have more value then wing players. I like Porter a ton but he hasn't really produced anything yet, so it is a bit of a stretch to say Porter alone has equal value to Kanter. That wreaks of some homer ish. I might be over-valueing Kanter but Porter certainly alone would be difficult to acquire him with.


The thing is that Porter has 2 more years on his rookie deal than Kanter does. That might be a big selling point for Utah if they aren't sold on Kanter/Favors being their bigs of the future. Porter may also be insurance if Hayward gets an offer the Jazz don't want to match.

The 2 year difference is definitely a selling point for Utah. Also, they've apparently been starting Hayward at shooting guard, so they could play Porter and Hayward together if they do re-sign Hayward. And starting guys like Jefferson and Williams at the forwards - they need to improve there. So this Kanter for Porter idea makes a lot of sense. Last season, a healthy Kanter averaged 18.8/11.3 per 40 with a 58% TS%. This season - the injury has put him on the outs on a bad team, so his trade value has plummeted, but his ability is presumably still there. Good call. I think it was mhd who was pushing for this a while back.
"A common mistake that people make when trying to design something completely foolproof is to underestimate the ingenuity of complete fools." - Douglas Adams
User avatar
nate33
Forum Mod - Wizards
Forum Mod - Wizards
Posts: 70,162
And1: 22,580
Joined: Oct 28, 2002

Re: Official Trade Thread - Part XXV 

Post#1266 » by nate33 » Tue Dec 24, 2013 7:02 pm

kirubel94 wrote:How about this, Alex Len for Otto. Len hasn't played much due to Injuries and the emergence of Miles Plumlee.

Gotta be careful with big man with foot injuries. That said, I do like the idea of trading Otto for a big man on a rookie deal. Ideally, it would be somebody in this draft class or the next. The long term goal is to have a guy develop so that he's starting caliber in 2016, but still on a cheap rookie deal. Then set up our cap situation so that we have max cap room in 2016 to go along with Wall, Beal and Good Young Big.

Porter for Noel would be ideal. Or Porter for a high potential big man in this draft class (McGary? Vonleh?). I still can't believe we didn't draft Noel in the first place. He'd be great alongside Nene or Gortat.
mhd
General Manager
Posts: 9,624
And1: 1,672
Joined: Mar 25, 2004

Re: Official Trade Thread - Part XXV 

Post#1267 » by mhd » Tue Dec 24, 2013 7:26 pm

nate33 wrote:
kirubel94 wrote:How about this, Alex Len for Otto. Len hasn't played much due to Injuries and the emergence of Miles Plumlee.

Gotta be careful with big man with foot injuries. That said, I do like the idea of trading Otto for a big man on a rookie deal. Ideally, it would be somebody in this draft class or the next. The long term goal is to have a guy develop so that he's starting caliber in 2016, but still on a cheap rookie deal. Then set up our cap situation so that we have max cap room in 2016 to go along with Wall, Beal and Good Young Big.

Porter for Noel would be ideal. Or Porter for a high potential big man in this draft class (McGary? Vonleh?). I still can't believe we didn't draft Noel in the first place. He'd be great alongside Nene or Gortat.



I doubt Phoenix does it, but what about Plumlee and our pick back for Porter+Seraphin?
fishercob
RealGM
Posts: 13,922
And1: 1,571
Joined: Apr 25, 2002
Location: Tenleytown, DC

Re: Official Trade Thread - Part XXV 

Post#1268 » by fishercob » Tue Dec 24, 2013 7:45 pm

nate33 wrote:
kirubel94 wrote:How about this, Alex Len for Otto. Len hasn't played much due to Injuries and the emergence of Miles Plumlee.

Gotta be careful with big man with foot injuries. That said, I do like the idea of trading Otto for a big man on a rookie deal. Ideally, it would be somebody in this draft class or the next. The long term goal is to have a guy develop so that he's starting caliber in 2016, but still on a cheap rookie deal. Then set up our cap situation so that we have max cap room in 2016 to go along with Wall, Beal and Good Young Big.

Porter for Noel would be ideal. Or Porter for a high potential big man in this draft class (McGary? Vonleh?). I still can't believe we didn't draft Noel in the first place. He'd be great alongside Nene or Gortat.


I can believe it. A weightless big with little offensive skill who relies on athleticism to affect the game sustained a major knee injury (and he another major leg injury in high school, right?). So to reach his potential, Noel needs to develop some offensive skill. He needs to get strong enough to battle in the post in the NBA (because he's sure as hell not going to be guarded away from the hoop). But in developing that strength, he has to avoid putting on too much weight to put a stress on his frame AND maintain or improve his athleticism so he can rebound and contest shots against NBA athletes.

Noel seems like a super-risky prospect to me. As time passes, I expect to be more and more comfortable with Porter as our choice.
"Some people have a way with words....some people....not have way."
— Steve Martin
nuposse04
RealGM
Posts: 11,298
And1: 2,440
Joined: Jul 20, 2004
Location: on a rock
   

Re: Official Trade Thread - Part XXV 

Post#1269 » by nuposse04 » Tue Dec 24, 2013 7:54 pm

Ruzious wrote:
verbal8 wrote:
nuposse04 wrote:Kanter has at least shown signs of being a promising young big in his first two season. Bigs always have more value then wing players. I like Porter a ton but he hasn't really produced anything yet, so it is a bit of a stretch to say Porter alone has equal value to Kanter. That wreaks of some homer ish. I might be over-valueing Kanter but Porter certainly alone would be difficult to acquire him with.


The thing is that Porter has 2 more years on his rookie deal than Kanter does. That might be a big selling point for Utah if they aren't sold on Kanter/Favors being their bigs of the future. Porter may also be insurance if Hayward gets an offer the Jazz don't want to match.

The 2 year difference is definitely a selling point for Utah. Also, they've apparently been starting Hayward at shooting guard, so they could play Porter and Hayward together if they do re-sign Hayward. And starting guys like Jefferson and Williams at the forwards - they need to improve there. So this Kanter for Porter idea makes a lot of sense. Last season, a healthy Kanter averaged 18.8/11.3 per 40 with a 58% TS%. This season - the injury has put him on the outs on a bad team, so his trade value has plummeted, but his ability is presumably still there. Good call. I think it was mhd who was pushing for this a while back.


There are quite a bit of Jazz fans believe part of his regression is due to being put into bad positions. Part of his benching is apparently due to bad defense. Admittingly, I haven't watched many Jazz games this season so I can't comment on his defense. I do wonder if they're playing him at the 4, where he may not be agile enough for. He seems plenty strong and long enough to me to be a 5 in todays NBA. That would make Gortat into a considerable trade asset.
Ruzious
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 47,909
And1: 11,582
Joined: Jul 17, 2001
       

Re: Official Trade Thread - Part XXV 

Post#1270 » by Ruzious » Tue Dec 24, 2013 7:58 pm

fishercob wrote:
nate33 wrote:
kirubel94 wrote:How about this, Alex Len for Otto. Len hasn't played much due to Injuries and the emergence of Miles Plumlee.

Gotta be careful with big man with foot injuries. That said, I do like the idea of trading Otto for a big man on a rookie deal. Ideally, it would be somebody in this draft class or the next. The long term goal is to have a guy develop so that he's starting caliber in 2016, but still on a cheap rookie deal. Then set up our cap situation so that we have max cap room in 2016 to go along with Wall, Beal and Good Young Big.

Porter for Noel would be ideal. Or Porter for a high potential big man in this draft class (McGary? Vonleh?). I still can't believe we didn't draft Noel in the first place. He'd be great alongside Nene or Gortat.


I can believe it. A weightless big with little offensive skill who relies on athleticism to affect the game sustained a major knee injury (and he another major leg injury in high school, right?). So to reach his potential, Noel needs to develop some offensive skill. He needs to get strong enough to battle in the post in the NBA (because he's sure as hell not going to be guarded away from the hoop). But in developing that strength, he has to avoid putting on too much weight to put a stress on his frame AND maintain or improve his athleticism so he can rebound and contest shots against NBA athletes.

Noel seems like a super-risky prospect to me. As time passes, I expect to be more and more comfortable with Porter as our choice.

So because Porter is not as athletic, he has a brighter future? Last I checked, he's not a contestant for Mr. Universe himself. And based on production, Noel as a freshman was equal to Porter as a sophomore.

As time passes... I think every team that passed on Noel will regret it. 19 year olds do tend to gain weight and bulk and strength... as time passes. Even 20 year old Porter will get bigger... as time does what?
"A common mistake that people make when trying to design something completely foolproof is to underestimate the ingenuity of complete fools." - Douglas Adams
mhd
General Manager
Posts: 9,624
And1: 1,672
Joined: Mar 25, 2004

Re: Official Trade Thread - Part XXV 

Post#1271 » by mhd » Tue Dec 24, 2013 9:03 pm

Ruzious wrote:
fishercob wrote:
nate33 wrote:Gotta be careful with big man with foot injuries. That said, I do like the idea of trading Otto for a big man on a rookie deal. Ideally, it would be somebody in this draft class or the next. The long term goal is to have a guy develop so that he's starting caliber in 2016, but still on a cheap rookie deal. Then set up our cap situation so that we have max cap room in 2016 to go along with Wall, Beal and Good Young Big.

Porter for Noel would be ideal. Or Porter for a high potential big man in this draft class (McGary? Vonleh?). I still can't believe we didn't draft Noel in the first place. He'd be great alongside Nene or Gortat.


I can believe it. A weightless big with little offensive skill who relies on athleticism to affect the game sustained a major knee injury (and he another major leg injury in high school, right?). So to reach his potential, Noel needs to develop some offensive skill. He needs to get strong enough to battle in the post in the NBA (because he's sure as hell not going to be guarded away from the hoop). But in developing that strength, he has to avoid putting on too much weight to put a stress on his frame AND maintain or improve his athleticism so he can rebound and contest shots against NBA athletes.

Noel seems like a super-risky prospect to me. As time passes, I expect to be more and more comfortable with Porter as our choice.

So because Porter is not as athletic, he has a brighter future? Last I checked, he's not a contestant for Mr. Universe himself. And based on production, Noel as a freshman was equal to Porter as a sophomore.

As time passes... I think every team that passed on Noel will regret it. 19 year olds do tend to gain weight and bulk and strength... as time passes. Even 20 year old Porter will get bigger... as time does what?



Well, the one guy EVERYONE is regretting not taking is Giannis. Considering his age, he'll likely be the best player in this draft.
Wizardspride
RealGM
Posts: 17,275
And1: 11,471
Joined: Nov 05, 2004
Location: Olney, MD/Kailua/Kaneohe, HI
       

Re: Official Trade Thread - Part XXV 

Post#1272 » by Wizardspride » Tue Dec 24, 2013 10:49 pm

kirubel94 wrote:How about this, Alex Len for Otto. Len hasn't played much due to Injuries and the emergence of Miles Plumlee.

Considering I wanted to select Len to begin with, you know I'm on board.

President Donald Trump referred to African countries, Haiti and El Salvador as "shithole" nations during a meeting Thursday and asked why the U.S. can't have more immigrants from Norway.
User avatar
SUPERBALLMAN
Lead Assistant
Posts: 4,549
And1: 1,278
Joined: Aug 08, 2006
     

Re: Official Trade Thread - Part XXV 

Post#1273 » by SUPERBALLMAN » Tue Dec 24, 2013 11:52 pm

nate33 wrote:
kirubel94 wrote:How about this, Alex Len for Otto. Len hasn't played much due to Injuries and the emergence of Miles Plumlee.

Gotta be careful with big man with foot injuries. That said, I do like the idea of trading Otto for a big man on a rookie deal. Ideally, it would be somebody in this draft class or the next. The long term goal is to have a guy develop so that he's starting caliber in 2016, but still on a cheap rookie deal. Then set up our cap situation so that we have max cap room in 2016 to go along with Wall, Beal and Good Young Big.

Porter for Noel would be ideal. Or Porter for a high potential big man in this draft class (McGary? Vonleh?). I still can't believe we didn't draft Noel in the first place. He'd be great alongside Nene or Gortat.




I do wonder how this team would look with a rotation of Vucevic and Steven Adams if they had been our draft picks in place of Vesely and Porter. Plus if we had them in place, we'd still have our 2014 pick.

I'm still optimistic about Porter. It's impossible to make any kind of judgement on him yet. Other players, like Gortat and Beal, say he can play and he's gonna be good, so that is a very good sign to me. He's jumping into the NBA with essentially no training camp or preseason, in addition to not being at peak level physically after months of relative inactivity waiting for his hip flexor to heal. IMO we really wont' have a clue about what we potentially have in Otto until around Feb, and he gets a chance to get up to speed and find some level of comfort on this team.

The best scenario still is Porter impresses to the point that we can deal Ariza before the deadline to a contending team to bring back a young player that's not a major contributor stuck in a rotation log jam, similar to Porter's situation in fact.
"I love it when a plan comes together" - Colonel John "Hannibal" Smith
User avatar
long suffrin' boulez fan
General Manager
Posts: 7,831
And1: 3,624
Joined: Nov 18, 2005
Location: Just above Ted's double bottom line
       

Re: Official Trade Thread - Part XXV 

Post#1274 » by long suffrin' boulez fan » Wed Dec 25, 2013 4:42 am

kirubel94 wrote:How about this, Alex Len for Otto. Len hasn't played much due to Injuries and the emergence of Miles Plumlee.



Given how flippin' good Ariza's been this year, I 'd do it in a heartbeat, then extend Trevor.

I agree with Nate about the foot injury risks, but I'd swing for the fences here. Len could end up as an All Star center.
In Rizzo we trust
User avatar
GeeWiz
Sophomore
Posts: 205
And1: 15
Joined: Nov 28, 2013

Re: Official Trade Thread - Part XXV 

Post#1275 » by GeeWiz » Wed Dec 25, 2013 6:02 am

Noel for Porter. I'm in. Make it happen Ernie!


Sent from my iPhone using RealGM Forums
LyricalRico
Forum Mod - Wizards
Forum Mod - Wizards
Posts: 30,563
And1: 853
Joined: May 23, 2002
Location: Back into the fray!
Contact:
       

Re: Official Trade Thread - Part XXV 

Post#1276 » by LyricalRico » Wed Dec 25, 2013 4:36 pm

mhd wrote:what about Plumlee and our pick back for Porter+Seraphin?


Somewhat interesting, but I'd expect both Plumlee and the pick to be backup players. I'd prefer to get a starter in return for Porter. But, based on what Sacto got for TRob last year, that may not be possible.
payitforward
RealGM
Posts: 24,620
And1: 9,110
Joined: May 02, 2012
Location: On the Atlantic

Re: Official Trade Thread - Part XXV 

Post#1277 » by payitforward » Wed Dec 25, 2013 6:33 pm

Trading Porter for Noel or for Len would be tantamount to saying "I chose the wrong guy," since they both went after Otto in the draft a few months ago, and none of the three has played (Porter just the littlest bit...). How could a GM make that trade and not expect to be fired for the first error?

In fact, trading Porter at all amounts to the same thing -- the pick was worth more than Porter, since it would have given the other GM the opportunity to make his own choice. Unless you think there's someone out there who is just dying to have Otto Porter now -- i.e. based on his few minutes of PT.

I wish I saw -- or could think of -- some good trades that seemed actually possible. But we have seven guys who are worth absolutely nothing in a trade (Vesely, Singleton, Harrington, Maynor, Rice, Temple & Seraphin), 5 guys who obviously we aren't going to trade (Wall, Beal, Gortat and Webster -- along w/ Porter). Nene is signed long-term for more than he's worth, so he's a long shot to bring anything to our advantage.

That leaves Booker and Ariza. Not much to work with. Certainly, Ariza might turn out to be so valuable to some team on the edge of contending for a title that at the TD they'd give more for him than he's worth. I suppose. But which team is that? And what would be worth more than the cap space we're anyway going to have when he expires -- it'd have to be young talent.

Could you imagine Morey letting go of Asik, Jones and Greg Smith for Ariza and Seraphin? That would be a great trade for us (leaving aside the cap consequences of Asik's salary for the moment). But Jones has too much potential; Morey wouldn't do it -- and anyway who plays the 4 for him once Jones is gone?
Ruzious
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 47,909
And1: 11,582
Joined: Jul 17, 2001
       

Re: Official Trade Thread - Part XXV 

Post#1278 » by Ruzious » Wed Dec 25, 2013 6:50 pm

mhd wrote:
Ruzious wrote:
fishercob wrote:
I can believe it. A weightless big with little offensive skill who relies on athleticism to affect the game sustained a major knee injury (and he another major leg injury in high school, right?). So to reach his potential, Noel needs to develop some offensive skill. He needs to get strong enough to battle in the post in the NBA (because he's sure as hell not going to be guarded away from the hoop). But in developing that strength, he has to avoid putting on too much weight to put a stress on his frame AND maintain or improve his athleticism so he can rebound and contest shots against NBA athletes.

Noel seems like a super-risky prospect to me. As time passes, I expect to be more and more comfortable with Porter as our choice.

So because Porter is not as athletic, he has a brighter future? Last I checked, he's not a contestant for Mr. Universe himself. And based on production, Noel as a freshman was equal to Porter as a sophomore.

As time passes... I think every team that passed on Noel will regret it. 19 year olds do tend to gain weight and bulk and strength... as time passes. Even 20 year old Porter will get bigger... as time does what?



Well, the one guy EVERYONE is regretting not taking is Giannis. Considering his age, he'll likely be the best player in this draft.

If/when he grows to 7 feet, I'm salivating thinking of the length of that Milwaukee frontcourt with Hansen and Sanders. Can't wait for Sanders to finally play. It's going to be hard to keep the worst record in the NBA.
"A common mistake that people make when trying to design something completely foolproof is to underestimate the ingenuity of complete fools." - Douglas Adams
User avatar
GeeWiz
Sophomore
Posts: 205
And1: 15
Joined: Nov 28, 2013

Re: Official Trade Thread - Part XXV 

Post#1279 » by GeeWiz » Thu Dec 26, 2013 5:21 am

Otto for Len, Noel, Kanter, any of those guys. Again, I'd target Len or Noel with their rookie deals, but in this draft class, we should have swung for the fences with Noel or Len. I mean, the Suns or 6ers would have to consider it with Plumlee emerging and Evan Turner leaving, opening up things for Embiid possibly. Or do they put Noel at the 4? Either way, I'd do any of these trades, not any of that Illyasova crap.
mhd
General Manager
Posts: 9,624
And1: 1,672
Joined: Mar 25, 2004

Re: Official Trade Thread - Part XXV 

Post#1280 » by mhd » Thu Dec 26, 2013 2:20 pm

GeeWiz wrote:Otto for Len, Noel, Kanter, any of those guys. Again, I'd target Len or Noel with their rookie deals, but in this draft class, we should have swung for the fences with Noel or Len. I mean, the Suns or 6ers would have to consider it with Plumlee emerging and Evan Turner leaving, opening up things for Embiid possibly. Or do they put Noel at the 4? Either way, I'd do any of these trades, not any of that Illyasova crap.



Why? Philly wasn't doing the trade they made for Otto freaking Porter. Noel was universally the #1 pick before the injury. The Suns have a smart FO. They had Len as their #1 rated prospect.

Return to Washington Wizards