AFM wrote:
He’s a very likeable kid. I’d be excited if we do pick him.
Moderators: nate33, montestewart, LyricalRico
jangles86 wrote:Does anyone see Acr Bailey as a better prospect as what Brandon Miller was?
trwi7 wrote:**** me deep, Giannis. ****. Me. Deep.
keynote wrote:
If this is accurate, I don't think we should try to outbid. Take Maluach or Johnson and call it a day.
keynote wrote:
If this is accurate, I don't think we should try to outbid. Take Maluach or Johnson and call it a day.
jangles86 wrote:I don’t see where Tre Johnson fits into our future.
Couli, Bub, George and Tre would be a log jam at the guard where none are great primary ball handlers.
jangles86 wrote:I don’t see where Tre Johnson fits into our future.
Couli, Bub, George and Tre would be a log jam at the guard where none are great primary ball handlers.
jangles86 wrote:I don’t see where Tre Johnson fits into our future.
Couli, Bub, George and Tre would be a log jam at the guard where none are great primary ball handlers.
keynote wrote:
If this is accurate, I don't think we should try to outbid. Take Maluach or Johnson and call it a day.
The Consiglieri wrote:keynote wrote:
If this is accurate, I don't think we should try to outbid. Take Maluach or Johnson and call it a day.
I think I would try for:
6 and 18 for 4 and 33.
I think if our board says Bailey is the #2 to #4 in this class, as he was the #2 recruit 18 months ago according to all services, that, for me anyway, puts him miles ahead of everyone else who will be available at 6 other than maybe Maluach, who wasn't even ranked by most services (I think I saw him top 5 or 10 according to one service).
closg00 wrote:May Ace become the next Michael Jordan