ImageImageImageImageImage

Official Trade Thread XVII: 6/29/11 - 1/20 /12

Moderators: nate33, montestewart, LyricalRico

llcc25
Senior
Posts: 532
And1: 1
Joined: Feb 13, 2002

Re: Official Trade Thread XVII 

Post#1421 » by llcc25 » Thu Jan 19, 2012 3:55 am

nate33 wrote:I'd make a Young for Morrow trade if our goal was to position ourselves for a run at Harden in 2013. Morrow would be the stopgap starting SG next year. I'd wait until the Trade Deadline to pull the trigger though. Young is better than Morrow (mostly on D).

If we'd rather go after Gordon this summer, then forget it.

It probably won't matter. Young wouldn't agree to the trade.

Worth a shot. I'd say even if we plan on pursuing Gordon this summer, morrow is IMO a better 3rd guard than Crawford. And his stats first 3 years compare favorably to young. If we shore up our front court this summer, having wall on break or half court set dishing out to morrow and Gordon on both wings next year could be exciting. And if Morrow don't work out he is only on our books for 1 year.
jivelikenice
Analyst
Posts: 3,074
And1: 145
Joined: Jul 15, 2005

Re: Official Trade Thread XVII 

Post#1422 » by jivelikenice » Thu Jan 19, 2012 4:30 am

I don't want to trade Crawford yet. He's played a lot more under control the last two games and I'd like to see if he can continue to play more efficient ball and grow into this 3rd guard role.
User avatar
nate33
Forum Mod - Wizards
Forum Mod - Wizards
Posts: 70,812
And1: 23,338
Joined: Oct 28, 2002

Re: Official Trade Thread XVII 

Post#1423 » by nate33 » Thu Jan 19, 2012 4:48 am

jivelikenice wrote:I don't want to trade Crawford yet. He's played a lot more under control the last two games and I'd like to see if he can continue to play more efficient ball and grow into this 3rd guard role.

I'd use any uptick in his game to trade him for anything of value.
jivelikenice
Analyst
Posts: 3,074
And1: 145
Joined: Jul 15, 2005

Re: Official Trade Thread XVII 

Post#1424 » by jivelikenice » Thu Jan 19, 2012 5:29 am

nate33 wrote:
jivelikenice wrote:I don't want to trade Crawford yet. He's played a lot more under control the last two games and I'd like to see if he can continue to play more efficient ball and grow into this 3rd guard role.

I'd use any uptick in his game to trade him for anything of value.


That's the thing. 2 games of solid ball isn't enough to bring up his value most so you might as well see if he can maintain this more efficient and smarter brand of basketball he's displayed the last two games. its not like he has a big deal so why rush into a deal with him?
mhd
General Manager
Posts: 9,752
And1: 1,741
Joined: Mar 25, 2004

Re: Official Trade Thread XVII 

Post#1425 » by mhd » Thu Jan 19, 2012 5:29 am

A "sell high" on McGee trade idea:

Wiz trade Turiaf+McGee+Crawford for Derrick Williams+Drew Gooden
Minny trades Derrick Williams+Wes Johnson+Martell Webster for Bogut+Jordan Crawford
Bucks trade Bogut+Gooden for Wes Johnson+McGee+Webster+Turiaf (expiring)

Bucks clear off longterm salary committments to Bogut and Gooden for McGee and Wes Johnson
Minny wants to win now and show Love they are committed to it. They put Beasley at SF and still have Ellington and Barea to man to SG position.
Wiz decide on not extending McGee and give the SF position to Williams for the next 8-10 years.
Ruzious
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 47,909
And1: 11,582
Joined: Jul 17, 2001
       

Re: Official Trade Thread XVII 

Post#1426 » by Ruzious » Thu Jan 19, 2012 11:38 am

jivelikenice wrote:
nate33 wrote:
jivelikenice wrote:I don't want to trade Crawford yet. He's played a lot more under control the last two games and I'd like to see if he can continue to play more efficient ball and grow into this 3rd guard role.

I'd use any uptick in his game to trade him for anything of value.


That's the thing. 2 games of solid ball isn't enough to bring up his value most so you might as well see if he can maintain this more efficient and smarter brand of basketball he's displayed the last two games. its not like he has a big deal so why rush into a deal with him?

I was thinking the same thing. What's the point in trying to trade him when he has minimal trade value and has a small contract. We got him for basically nothing, and he's put up very inefficient stats here, so it's really not likely he's improved his trade value to anything substantial.
"A common mistake that people make when trying to design something completely foolproof is to underestimate the ingenuity of complete fools." - Douglas Adams
leswizards
Rookie
Posts: 1,017
And1: 289
Joined: Jun 09, 2010

Re: Official Trade Thread XVII 

Post#1427 » by leswizards » Thu Jan 19, 2012 12:13 pm

nate33 wrote:I'd make a Young for Morrow trade if our goal was to position ourselves for a run at Harden in 2013. Morrow would be the stopgap starting SG next year. I'd wait until the Trade Deadline to pull the trigger though. Young is better than Morrow (mostly on D).

If we'd rather go after Gordon this summer, then forget it.

It probably won't matter. Young wouldn't agree to the trade.


Young wouldn't agree to that trade? Or any trade in general?

Young only loses his bird rights if he gets traded, correct? If that is true, since only the Wizards can use the bird rights, Nick really doesn't lose anything by getting traded if the Wizards have decided that Nick is not in their long term plans and are unlikely to ever use the bird rights.

I am a Nick Young fan, but I have come to believe it is time for the Wizards to move on without him, and I am wondering if the Wizards will be able to trade him before the deadline.
Viva le tank! At this pace, it will never end.
verbal8
General Manager
Posts: 8,357
And1: 1,381
Joined: Jul 20, 2006
Location: Herndon, VA
     

Re: Official Trade Thread XVII 

Post#1428 » by verbal8 » Thu Jan 19, 2012 12:34 pm

mhd wrote:A "sell high" on McGee trade idea:

Wiz trade Turiaf+McGee+Crawford for Derrick Williams+Drew Gooden
Minny trades Derrick Williams+Wes Johnson+Martell Webster for Bogut+Jordan Crawford
Bucks trade Bogut+Gooden for Wes Johnson+McGee+Webster+Turiaf (expiring)

Bucks clear off longterm salary committments to Bogut and Gooden for McGee and Wes Johnson
Minny wants to win now and show Love they are committed to it. They put Beasley at SF and still have Ellington and Barea to man to SG position.
Wiz decide on not extending McGee and give the SF position to Williams for the next 8-10 years.


Kahn is a bad GM, but this is awful for Minnesota.
Ruzious
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 47,909
And1: 11,582
Joined: Jul 17, 2001
       

Re: Official Trade Thread XVII 

Post#1429 » by Ruzious » Thu Jan 19, 2012 2:14 pm

verbal8 wrote:
mhd wrote:A "sell high" on McGee trade idea:

Wiz trade Turiaf+McGee+Crawford for Derrick Williams+Drew Gooden
Minny trades Derrick Williams+Wes Johnson+Martell Webster for Bogut+Jordan Crawford
Bucks trade Bogut+Gooden for Wes Johnson+McGee+Webster+Turiaf (expiring)

Bucks clear off longterm salary committments to Bogut and Gooden for McGee and Wes Johnson
Minny wants to win now and show Love they are committed to it. They put Beasley at SF and still have Ellington and Barea to man to SG position.
Wiz decide on not extending McGee and give the SF position to Williams for the next 8-10 years.


Kahn is a bad GM, but this is awful for Minnesota.

Minny ends up with Love, Bogut, Rubio, and Ridnour - best white guy quartet since The Beatles. :D
"A common mistake that people make when trying to design something completely foolproof is to underestimate the ingenuity of complete fools." - Douglas Adams
Severn Hoos
Lead Assistant
Posts: 5,443
And1: 223
Joined: May 09, 2002

Re: Official Trade Thread XVII 

Post#1430 » by Severn Hoos » Thu Jan 19, 2012 2:31 pm

Hey - what about Rex, Googs, American Pie, and Georgie? Not to mention our own Pete Best (Brent Price)? We had an entire starting five. Take that, you lutefisk-loving hosers!
"A society that puts equality - in the sense of equality of outcome - ahead of freedom will end up with neither equality nor freedom. The use of force to achieve equality will destroy freedom" Milton Friedman, Free to Choose
LyricalRico
Forum Mod - Wizards
Forum Mod - Wizards
Posts: 30,570
And1: 854
Joined: May 23, 2002
Location: Back into the fray!
Contact:
       

Re: Official Trade Thread XVII 

Post#1431 » by LyricalRico » Thu Jan 19, 2012 3:11 pm

verbal8 wrote:
mhd wrote:A "sell high" on McGee trade idea:

Wiz trade Turiaf+McGee+Crawford for Derrick Williams+Drew Gooden
Minny trades Derrick Williams+Wes Johnson+Martell Webster for Bogut+Jordan Crawford
Bucks trade Bogut+Gooden for Wes Johnson+McGee+Webster+Turiaf (expiring)

Bucks clear off longterm salary committments to Bogut and Gooden for McGee and Wes Johnson
Minny wants to win now and show Love they are committed to it. They put Beasley at SF and still have Ellington and Barea to man to SG position.
Wiz decide on not extending McGee and give the SF position to Williams for the next 8-10 years.


Kahn is a bad GM, but this is awful for Minnesota.


I disagree, Ruz. Essentially it's DWill for Bogut, which seems fair. Especially when you consider that Bogut fills a huge need for them. Maybe including Johnson is a little much since he was taken so high, but that can be tweaked. The case can also be made that Washingotn isn't needed and MIL/MIN can just do Bogut for DWill+filler.
shrink
RealGM
Posts: 59,805
And1: 19,919
Joined: Sep 26, 2005

Re: Official Trade Thread XVII 

Post#1432 » by shrink » Thu Jan 19, 2012 5:22 pm

In Rico's defense, there was some discussion/rumors about a swap of the #2 for Bogut before the draft (although some said #2 for Bogut + #10).

Historically though, it's always harder to trade the lottery pick in his first year if not done on draft night. In general, once the guy is in the uniform, fans see him as how they hope he will be, not who he is likely to be, and I can't think of a #2 pick that was ever traded in his first year. However, MIN may be a unique situation, since all the fans eyes are focused on Rubio.

Also adding to Rico's trade is Herb Kohl. MIL fans rightfully recognize that the team really needs to rebuild, and Derrick Williams for 7 years is perhaps the best available rebuilding piece out there. However, Kohl refuses to rebuild, and wants to put the best team out there he can every year, regardless of first round exits and mediocre darft picks.

I still think WAS is stealing value here, but it's a decent idea.
Ruzious
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 47,909
And1: 11,582
Joined: Jul 17, 2001
       

Re: Official Trade Thread XVII 

Post#1433 » by Ruzious » Thu Jan 19, 2012 5:42 pm

LyricalRico wrote:
verbal8 wrote:
mhd wrote:A "sell high" on McGee trade idea:

Wiz trade Turiaf+McGee+Crawford for Derrick Williams+Drew Gooden
Minny trades Derrick Williams+Wes Johnson+Martell Webster for Bogut+Jordan Crawford
Bucks trade Bogut+Gooden for Wes Johnson+McGee+Webster+Turiaf (expiring)

Bucks clear off longterm salary committments to Bogut and Gooden for McGee and Wes Johnson
Minny wants to win now and show Love they are committed to it. They put Beasley at SF and still have Ellington and Barea to man to SG position.
Wiz decide on not extending McGee and give the SF position to Williams for the next 8-10 years.


Kahn is a bad GM, but this is awful for Minnesota.


I disagree, Ruz. Essentially it's DWill for Bogut, which seems fair. Especially when you consider that Bogut fills a huge need for them. Maybe including Johnson is a little much since he was taken so high, but that can be tweaked. The case can also be made that Washingotn isn't needed and MIL/MIN can just do Bogut for DWill+filler.

Don't blame me; it was verbal who verbalized disagreement. I like DWill going to Milwaukee, and Minnesota getting their all-white band.
"A common mistake that people make when trying to design something completely foolproof is to underestimate the ingenuity of complete fools." - Douglas Adams
llcc25
Senior
Posts: 532
And1: 1
Joined: Feb 13, 2002

Re: Official Trade Thread XVII 

Post#1434 » by llcc25 » Thu Jan 19, 2012 5:51 pm

Just throwing this out there. I know its so unlikely, but any thoughts on this 3 way with ORL and LAL before trade deadline?

LAL out - Bynum, 2012 pick (late first), Barnes
LAL in-Howard, Blatche
ORL out - Howard
ORL in- McGee, Young, Wiz 2012 pick (unprotected)
WAS out - McGee, Blatche, Young , 2012 pick
WAS in - Bynum, LAL 2012 pick

Why for LAL? they get Dwight w/o giving up Gasol
Why for ORL? its clear, that Dwight will walk at end of season. So IMO, our #1 pick will be best deal available for them.
Why for Wiz? Bynum is 2nd best center and better than anyone coming out 2012 draft. We don't have to worry about developing potential and get a bonified stud centerpiece for next decade to go build alongside Wall. We'd immediately be an attractive spot for FAs. Add in Gordon this year or Harden next year, along w/ our other blue collar young bucks and I see us as a top 4 east team in 2 years.
User avatar
Illuminaire
Veteran
Posts: 2,970
And1: 606
Joined: Jan 04, 2010
 

Re: Official Trade Thread XVII 

Post#1435 » by Illuminaire » Thu Jan 19, 2012 5:54 pm

Bynum is chronically injured and a headcase to rival Andre. I would feel a little sick if he was our best big man. Every year, it would be a ticking clock until his inevitable injury. XD
User avatar
sfam
Assistant Coach
Posts: 4,462
And1: 548
Joined: Aug 03, 2007
         

Re: Re: Official Trade Thread XVII 

Post#1436 » by sfam » Thu Jan 19, 2012 6:19 pm

llcc25 wrote:Just throwing this out there. I know its so unlikely, but any thoughts on this 3 way with ORL and LAL before trade deadline?

LAL out - Bynum, 2012 pick (late first), Barnes
LAL in-Howard, Blatche
ORL out - Howard
ORL in- McGee, Young, Wiz 2012 pick (unprotected)
WAS out - McGee, Blatche, Young , 2012 pick
WAS in - Bynum, LAL 2012 pick

Why for LAL? they get Dwight w/o giving up Gasol
Why for ORL? its clear, that Dwight will walk at end of season. So IMO, our #1 pick will be best deal available for them.
Why for Wiz? Bynum is 2nd best center and better than anyone coming out 2012 draft. We don't have to worry about developing potential and get a bonified stud centerpiece for next decade to go build alongside Wall. We'd immediately be an attractive spot for FAs. Add in Gordon this year or Harden next year, along w/ our other blue collar young bucks and I see us as a top 4 east team in 2 years.


If you substitute "Davis" for the Wizards 2012 pick, do you still like that idea? And wow, Bynum gets injured blowing his nose - why would we give up the farm for him?
montestewart
Forum Mod - Wizards
Forum Mod - Wizards
Posts: 14,835
And1: 7,966
Joined: Feb 25, 2009

Re: Official Trade Thread XVII 

Post#1437 » by montestewart » Thu Jan 19, 2012 6:39 pm

Way too good for LA, even if Bynum had virtually no injury risk
verbal8
General Manager
Posts: 8,357
And1: 1,381
Joined: Jul 20, 2006
Location: Herndon, VA
     

Re: Official Trade Thread XVII 

Post#1438 » by verbal8 » Thu Jan 19, 2012 6:58 pm

montestewart wrote:Way too good for LA, even if Bynum had virtually no injury risk

It seems roughly even for the Wizards, but pretty bad for the Magic. I think they have to move Turkyglu, unless they got Gasol and Bynum or get multiple good 1st round picks.
LyricalRico
Forum Mod - Wizards
Forum Mod - Wizards
Posts: 30,570
And1: 854
Joined: May 23, 2002
Location: Back into the fray!
Contact:
       

Re: Official Trade Thread XVII 

Post#1439 » by LyricalRico » Thu Jan 19, 2012 7:11 pm

Ruzious wrote:Don't blame me; it was verbal who verbalized disagreement. I like DWill going to Milwaukee, and Minnesota getting their all-white band.


:oops:
shrink
RealGM
Posts: 59,805
And1: 19,919
Joined: Sep 26, 2005

Re: Official Trade Thread XVII 

Post#1440 » by shrink » Thu Jan 19, 2012 7:14 pm

Ruzious wrote:Don't blame me; it was verbal who verbalized disagreement. I like DWill going to Milwaukee, and Minnesota getting their all-white band.


moss_is_1 wrote:DET - MIN Starting 5
ImageImageImageImageImage

VS

ImageImageImageImageImage

Return to Washington Wizards