ImageImageImageImageImage

Political Roundtable Part XVII

Moderators: LyricalRico, nate33, montestewart

DCZards
RealGM
Posts: 11,143
And1: 4,990
Joined: Jul 16, 2005
Location: The Streets of DC
     

Re: Political Roundtable Part XVII 

Post#1461 » by DCZards » Sat Jan 27, 2018 7:50 pm

stilldropin20 wrote:


is it significant that Obama average unemployment levels of 8% as high as 12%?

Where Trump has us at 4%


The unemployment rate the last two years of the Obama Administration never went above 5.7%. The unemployment rate the last 3 months of the Obama Administration never went above 4.9% and was 4.7% in December 2016. The rate for Dec. 2017 was 4.1%. So if you want to gloat over a .6% drop in unemployment since Trump took office go ride ahead.

Meanwhile, I'll gloat over the Obama Administration taking unemployment from 10% in 2009 to a low of 4.6% in 2016.

BTW, recent polls show that more Americans give more credit to Obama than Trump for our economy since most of the improvement took place during the 8 years that Obama was president.
stilldropin20
RealGM
Posts: 11,370
And1: 1,233
Joined: Jul 31, 2002
 

Re: RE: Re: Political Roundtable Part XVII 

Post#1462 » by stilldropin20 » Sat Jan 27, 2018 8:12 pm

DCZards wrote:
stilldropin20 wrote:


is it significant that Obama average unemployment levels of 8% as high as 12%?

Where Trump has us at 4%


The unemployment rate the last two years of the Obama Administration never went above 5.7%. The unemployment rate the last 3 months of the Obama Administration never went above 4.9% and was 4.7% in December 2016. The rate for Dec. 2017 was 4.1%. So if you want to gloat over a .6% drop in unemployment since Trump took office go ride ahead.

Meanwhile, I'll gloat over the Obama Administration taking unemployment from 10% in 2009 to a low of 4.6% in 2016.

BTW, recent polls show that more Americans give more credit to Obama than Trump for our economy since most of the improvement took place during the 8 years that Obama was president.

Those quote Americans quote are the ones watching CNN MSNBC NBC ABC CBS ... and being lied to every single day by bills media organizations. They are doing everything they can to undermine and discredit this President and those idiots you are talking about those flaming idiots that follow that b******* they are somehow crediting Obama for this massive upswing under the Trump era.

This is Trump trump and more Trump. It's all Trump.

Trump campaigned on this tax reform for 18 straight months. This tax reform is almost exactly what he campaigned on for those 18 months. He told all his business friends as did mnuchin behind the scenes. And the markets reacted accordingly the day he won.

Ever heard of a PE ratio? If you cut a corporation's taxes by 14% from 35% to 21%. They look much better on paper. They're valuation increases. And that alone is the jump you see in the stock market.

But then confidence jumped as well. Rocket fuel.

And manufacturing jobs came back. Which means infrastructure sectors are increasing.

It's compounding and exploding rapidly.

All under Trump and all because of Trumps policies and optimism and ability to sell the American economy to foreign investors and American investors who had their money overseas. 8 trillion!!!

Sent from my SM-N920T using RealGM mobile app
like i said, its a full rebuild.
stilldropin20
RealGM
Posts: 11,370
And1: 1,233
Joined: Jul 31, 2002
 

Re: Political Roundtable Part XVII 

Post#1463 » by stilldropin20 » Sat Jan 27, 2018 10:07 pm

Wizardspride wrote:
Read on Twitter


Read on Twitter


:lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol:

Ma gawd, is that what a "rising star" looks like these days? :noway: :noway: I wouldn't elect that guy dog catcher.

Speaking of...i was watching guess who is coming to diner the other night. and "I couldn't get elected dog catcher" was a line in that movie. I'm wondering if that was the original reference?
like i said, its a full rebuild.
payitforward
RealGM
Posts: 24,687
And1: 9,140
Joined: May 02, 2012
Location: On the Atlantic

Re: RE: Re: Political Roundtable Part XVII 

Post#1464 » by payitforward » Sat Jan 27, 2018 10:39 pm

stilldropin20 wrote:
DCZards wrote:
stilldropin20 wrote:is it significant that Obama average unemployment levels of 8% as high as 12%?

Where Trump has us at 4%

The unemployment rate the last two years of the Obama Administration never went above 5.7%. The unemployment rate the last 3 months of the Obama Administration never went above 4.9% and was 4.7% in December 2016. The rate for Dec. 2017 was 4.1%. So if you want to gloat over a .6% drop in unemployment since Trump took office go ride ahead.

Meanwhile, I'll gloat over the Obama Administration taking unemployment from 10% in 2009 to a low of 4.6% in 2016.

BTW, recent polls show that more Americans give more credit to Obama than Trump for our economy since most of the improvement took place during the 8 years that Obama was president.

Those quote Americans quote are the ones watching CNN MSNBC NBC ABC CBS ... and being lied to every single day by bills media organizations. They are doing everything they can to undermine and discredit this President and those idiots you are talking about those flaming idiots that follow that b******* they are somehow crediting Obama for this massive upswing under the Trump era.

This is Trump trump and more Trump. It's all Trump.

Trump campaigned on this tax reform for 18 straight months. This tax reform is almost exactly what he campaigned on for those 18 months. He told all his business friends as did mnuchin behind the scenes. And the markets reacted accordingly the day he won.

Ever heard of a PE ratio? If you cut a corporation's taxes by 14% from 35% to 21%. They look much better on paper. They're valuation increases. And that alone is the jump you see in the stock market.

But then confidence jumped as well. Rocket fuel.

And manufacturing jobs came back. Which means infrastructure sectors are increasing.

It's compounding and exploding rapidly.

All under Trump and all because of Trumps policies and optimism and ability to sell the American economy to foreign investors and American investors who had their money overseas. 8 trillion!!

I feel so sorry for nate that his "ally" in this thread is you, stillpoopin, I really do.

There's been no "massive upswing" -- the economy continues to move along as it has for some years.
There's no need to do anything to "discredit" Donald Trump -- he does it all on his own.
Now here's one that might require you to do some basic thinking; lets see if you are up to it -- the current tax bill hasn't cut corporate taxes from 35% to 21%; it's cut corporate tax rates. US tax laws are notable for their complexity especially in the area of deductions. IOW, a tax "rate" doesn't directly translate into taxes paid. There's no data yet on what corporations will wind up paying under the new law. I'm not doubting they'll pay a little less -- don't get me wrong.
Your idea that these tax changes will have a significant effect on PE ratios shows the same ignorance. A really colossal ignorance --
when a stock price goes up, what effect does that have on the company's PE ratio, do you think?
The idea of an effect on "valuation" is even more of an invention.
The notion, moreover, that jumps in corporate valuation have fueled the stock market rise is more of that same 'poopin' you like to do. In essence, it's backwards.
Something that hasn't happened can't really "compound" either -- not to mention "explode."
As to the idea that $$ held abroad has started to flow back into the US, really..., you must be out of your mind. Nothing of that kind has happened.
Finally "manufacturing jobs came back" -- oh yeah. I think there are 25000 more people working in manufacturing than a year ago. Of course a year ago I think there were more working in manufacturing than the previous year....
In fact, job growth continues modestly as it has for years. & no monthly rise under Trump has equalled any of the top ten months of job growth under Obama.

The point isn't that this is Trump's fault in any sense. No President can affect the core issues driving economic growth on his own.

You claim to have a Phd, don't you? I'd love to see your thesis, good God....
payitforward
RealGM
Posts: 24,687
And1: 9,140
Joined: May 02, 2012
Location: On the Atlantic

Re: Political Roundtable Part XVII 

Post#1465 » by payitforward » Sat Jan 27, 2018 10:50 pm

stilldropin20 wrote:
Wizardspride wrote:
Read on Twitter


Read on Twitter


:lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol:

Ma gawd, is that what a "rising star" looks like these days? :noway: :noway: I wouldn't elect that guy dog catcher.

Speaking of...i was watching guess who is coming to diner the other night. and "I couldn't get elected dog catcher" was a line in that movie. I'm wondering if that was the original reference?

Actually, Donald Trump came up with that phrase. & it's compounding, exploding. People all over the world have so much confidence in Donald Trump that his global approval is at 102% It's the greatest global approval rating in the history of global approval ratings.

In fact, it's now been reported that based on his first year in office, he certainly could be elected dog catcher. There are even some people who maintain that, were he, he would actually be able to catch a dog or two using the self-invented method he would be sure to employ:
Spoiler:
He plans to grope the female dogs & threaten to fire the male ones.

What do you think, stilpoopin, will it work? After all...
Spoiler:
I'm sure you've groped a lot of dogs in your day. Having that Phd 'n all.
stilldropin20
RealGM
Posts: 11,370
And1: 1,233
Joined: Jul 31, 2002
 

Re: Political Roundtable Part XVII 

Post#1466 » by stilldropin20 » Sat Jan 27, 2018 10:51 pm

Zonker, did you hear about this? wondering how you feel? Main stream media suppressed this photo apparently.

Read on Twitter

Dershowitz' take
Read on Twitter


Clint Eastwood's take

Read on Twitter


jojoh888's take

Read on Twitter


Dr Anderson's take
Read on Twitter

Read on Twitter

Read on Twitter
like i said, its a full rebuild.
cammac
General Manager
Posts: 8,757
And1: 6,216
Joined: Aug 02, 2013
Location: Niagara Peninsula
         

Re: Political Roundtable Part XVII 

Post#1467 » by cammac » Sat Jan 27, 2018 11:24 pm

Trump economic loses!
Travel to the U.S. has been on the decline ever since President Donald Trump took office, and new data shows the slump translates to a cost of $4.6 billion in lost spending and 40,000 jobs.
The latest data from the National Travel and Tourism Office shows a 3.3 percent drop in travel spending and a 4 percent decline in inbound travel.

https://www.dailykos.com/stories/2018/1/27/1735663/-Donald-Trump-s-mouth-has-cost-U-S-40-000-jobs-and-4-6-billion-in-lost-tourism
User avatar
nate33
Forum Mod - Wizards
Forum Mod - Wizards
Posts: 70,218
And1: 22,624
Joined: Oct 28, 2002

Re: Political Roundtable Part XVII 

Post#1468 » by nate33 » Sat Jan 27, 2018 11:45 pm

cammac wrote:Trump economic loses!
Travel to the U.S. has been on the decline ever since President Donald Trump took office, and new data shows the slump translates to a cost of $4.6 billion in lost spending and 40,000 jobs.
The latest data from the National Travel and Tourism Office shows a 3.3 percent drop in travel spending and a 4 percent decline in inbound travel.

https://www.dailykos.com/stories/2018/1/27/1735663/-Donald-Trump-s-mouth-has-cost-U-S-40-000-jobs-and-4-6-billion-in-lost-tourism

I'm sure it had nothing to do with three of the most damaging hurricanes in U.S. History hitting our coasts in one summer.
cammac
General Manager
Posts: 8,757
And1: 6,216
Joined: Aug 02, 2013
Location: Niagara Peninsula
         

Re: Political Roundtable Part XVII 

Post#1469 » by cammac » Sat Jan 27, 2018 11:57 pm

Where is the 3% growth in the GDP?
Trumps boast was to increase the GDP numbers to emerging nations numbers and the year is over how did he succeed? Earlier in this forum I said that a GDP growth in developed economies should be in the 2 to 3% range. Some argued that my numbers were too modest and that higher than 3% was doable! I can agree coming off a extreme downturn it can happen but that is only to equalize previous years. The USA came in with a very respectable 2.6% growth with poor 1st & 4th quarters. That is the 2nd best growth in the Group of 7.
As Trump took office, the slack in the workforce already was minimal. It's true that the labor participation rate — the share of working-age persons with jobs — was at a mere 63%, down from 66.4% in January 2007. The aging of the U.S. population leaves little hope of reversing the trend line. The last big increase in workforce participation was the product of the baby boom, but those workers are now retiring. I cited a Pew Research Center report that unless immigration takes up the slack by providing 18 million more workers, the U.S. workforce will continue to shrink at least through 2035. Trump immigration policies will keep those workers out.

As for productivity, it's been declining for many years, and the trend doesn't seem to be reversing.”


A shrinking workforce does not make for strong economic growth. Germany, Canada, France and Britain’s economies grew faster than the U.S.’s last year, and, with maybe the exception of Canada, all these counties have dealt with the backlashes of nativism and intolerance that have resulted from importing immigrant labor to sustain that growth.


Note to NATE & SD20 your dreams of mass deportation of illegals would cause drastic harm to the USA economy.

“The truth is that presidents seldom have as much influence over economic cycles as they think, or wish. The U.S. stock market has been strong, but so have the markets in other developed countries. The same goes for GDP. Trump hasn't actually enacted much in the way of policy that would influence economic growth one way or another, though some recent initiatives, such as placing tariffs on foreign solar panels, might actually suppress U.S. growth. His economic team in Davos communicated a totally confused message on the U.S. dollar — Treasury Secretary Steve Mnuchin at first said the U.S. favored a weak dollar (which suppresses imports and spurs exports, but also could ignite domestic inflation), then walked back his remarks as Trump expressed support for a strong dollar.

The ultimate goal of 3%-plus economic growth? It would be a grand achievement if it happens. But it's not the way to bet.”


BTW Canada had the top growth of the Group of 7 without final figures could be slightly over or under3%

https://www.dailykos.com/stories/2018/1/27/1736453/-Trump-didn-t-get-his-3-plus-economic-growth-for-2017-and-is-unlikely-to-in-2018-or-19-or
User avatar
FAH1223
RealGM
Posts: 16,296
And1: 7,390
Joined: Nov 01, 2005
Location: Laurel, MD
       

Re: Political Roundtable Part XVII 

Post#1470 » by FAH1223 » Sun Jan 28, 2018 3:53 am

Read on Twitter
Image
DCZards
RealGM
Posts: 11,143
And1: 4,990
Joined: Jul 16, 2005
Location: The Streets of DC
     

Re: Political Roundtable Part XVII 

Post#1471 » by DCZards » Sun Jan 28, 2018 5:58 am

stilldropin20 wrote:Zonker, did you hear about this? wondering how you feel? Main stream media suppressed this photo apparently.

Read on Twitter


There are certainly worse things than meeting with Farrakhan...like screwing a porn star while married to another woman and boasting about grabbing unsuspecting women by the pu**y, which, btw, is sexual assault.
User avatar
TGW
RealGM
Posts: 13,349
And1: 6,720
Joined: Oct 22, 2010

Re: Political Roundtable Part XVII 

Post#1472 » by TGW » Sun Jan 28, 2018 6:31 am

Taking a picture with Farrakhan is a problem, but selecting an open white supremacist in Jeff Sessions for AG is aye okay.

Lol you drump cheerleaders are a piece of work.
Some random troll wrote:Not to sound negative, but this team is owned by an arrogant cheapskate, managed by a moron and coached by an idiot. Recipe for disaster.
User avatar
FAH1223
RealGM
Posts: 16,296
And1: 7,390
Joined: Nov 01, 2005
Location: Laurel, MD
       

Re: Political Roundtable Part XVII 

Post#1473 » by FAH1223 » Sun Jan 28, 2018 7:13 am

Read on Twitter


More then tripling their 2014 midterm expenditure.
Image
cammac
General Manager
Posts: 8,757
And1: 6,216
Joined: Aug 02, 2013
Location: Niagara Peninsula
         

Re: Political Roundtable Part XVII 

Post#1474 » by cammac » Sun Jan 28, 2018 2:24 pm

Trump and international discourse on trade in the early part of the Trump regime Canada was the main punching bag. A 300% duty on C Series Bombardier Jets brought by Boeing who doesn't make a similar plane. The USA International Trade commission ruled in a 4 to 0 decision that Boeing did not suffer harm from the prospective import of the C Series aircraft.
Canada and USA still have 2 major disputes in softwood lumber and pulp which will soon be adjudicated in Canada's favor as they have done in the past.
User avatar
gtn130
Analyst
Posts: 3,512
And1: 2,740
Joined: Mar 18, 2009

Re: Political Roundtable Part XVII 

Post#1475 » by gtn130 » Sun Jan 28, 2018 4:30 pm

dckingsfan wrote:They went farther... they implied/posted that if you are independent you a racist as well.


Pretty sure I never said or intimated that, but what if I did?

Maybe if people are genuinely concerned about racism in America, they, instead of roundly rejecting anyone accusing them of being racist, look inward and maybe try to do better?

Like the fundamental issue here is inequality - not virtue signaling or partisanship or scoring points. If someone accuses you of being racist, try thinking long and hard about it instead of declaring that they're tribalists with ulterior motives.

People like Nate will up and leave the conversation if you insinuate that they're racist - why? Aside from being a pearl-clutching snowflake, it's because he cares far more about identity politics than the actual issues at hand.
User avatar
gtn130
Analyst
Posts: 3,512
And1: 2,740
Joined: Mar 18, 2009

Re: RE: Re: Political Roundtable Part XVII 

Post#1476 » by gtn130 » Sun Jan 28, 2018 4:33 pm

payitforward wrote:I feel so sorry for nate


Man, Nate being a good NBA poster has really bought him some latitude.
dckingsfan
RealGM
Posts: 34,819
And1: 20,379
Joined: May 28, 2010

Re: Political Roundtable Part XVII 

Post#1477 » by dckingsfan » Sun Jan 28, 2018 5:08 pm

gtn130 wrote:
dckingsfan wrote:They went farther... they implied/posted that if you are independent you a racist as well.

Pretty sure I never said or intimated that, but what if I did?

Maybe if people are genuinely concerned about racism in America, they, instead of roundly rejecting anyone accusing them of being racist, look inward and maybe try to do better?

Like the fundamental issue here is inequality - not virtue signaling or partisanship or scoring points. If someone accuses you of being racist, try thinking long and hard about it instead of declaring that they're tribalists with ulterior motives.

People like Nate will up and leave the conversation if you insinuate that they're racist - why? Aside from being a pearl-clutching snowflake, it's because he cares far more about identity politics than the actual issues at hand.

Very sure you did and based upon this post - pretty clear that is how you feel.

Yes, nate (based upon his post - cares about identity politics). And so do the single issue voters (you) with regards to racism. They see everything through that prism and immediately identify us vs. them (you might want to think long and hard about that one).

It is a very narrow approach - kind of like flying an airplane and only looking at air speed - eventually you crash into the side of the mountain.

There are MANY problems in this country. Racism is one - and we can do better. But if you think it is THE issue (and the only issue) - then, we have to agree to disagree.

IMO, THE issue is that neither of our parties can govern and have set us on a very unsustainable path. If you want to see countries that are going backwards on racism - look at those that don't have a well functioning economy.
User avatar
gtn130
Analyst
Posts: 3,512
And1: 2,740
Joined: Mar 18, 2009

Re: Political Roundtable Part XVII 

Post#1478 » by gtn130 » Sun Jan 28, 2018 5:27 pm

Read on Twitter


Legit laughable that I'm accused of identity politics because I take a strong stand against racism. GMAFB with this face melting CENTRISM
closg00
RealGM
Posts: 24,541
And1: 4,486
Joined: Nov 21, 2004

Re: Political Roundtable Part XVII 

Post#1479 » by closg00 » Sun Jan 28, 2018 5:45 pm

stilldropin20 wrote:Zonker, did you hear about this? wondering how you feel? Main stream media suppressed this photo apparently.

Read on Twitter



SD20 I seriously have to question your intelligence about you posting this photo and inviting a comparison between Trump and Obama with-respect to their associations and track-record on racial issues, do you really want to go-there? Don't think-so
stilldropin20
RealGM
Posts: 11,370
And1: 1,233
Joined: Jul 31, 2002
 

Re: Political Roundtable Part XVII 

Post#1480 » by stilldropin20 » Sun Jan 28, 2018 7:10 pm

cammac wrote:Where is the 3% growth in the GDP?
Trumps boast was to increase the GDP numbers to emerging nations numbers and the year is over how did he succeed? Earlier in this forum I said that a GDP growth in developed economies should be in the 2 to 3% range. Some argued that my numbers were too modest and that higher than 3% was doable! I can agree coming off a extreme downturn it can happen but that is only to equalize previous years. The USA came in with a very respectable 2.6% growth with poor 1st & 4th quarters. That is the 2nd best growth in the Group of 7.
As Trump took office, the slack in the workforce already was minimal. It's true that the labor participation rate — the share of working-age persons with jobs — was at a mere 63%, down from 66.4% in January 2007. The aging of the U.S. population leaves little hope of reversing the trend line. The last big increase in workforce participation was the product of the baby boom, but those workers are now retiring. I cited a Pew Research Center report that unless immigration takes up the slack by providing 18 million more workers, the U.S. workforce will continue to shrink at least through 2035. Trump immigration policies will keep those workers out.

As for productivity, it's been declining for many years, and the trend doesn't seem to be reversing.”


A shrinking workforce does not make for strong economic growth. Germany, Canada, France and Britain’s economies grew faster than the U.S.’s last year, and, with maybe the exception of Canada, all these counties have dealt with the backlashes of nativism and intolerance that have resulted from importing immigrant labor to sustain that growth.


Note to NATE & SD20 your dreams of mass deportation of illegals would cause drastic harm to the USA economy.

“The truth is that presidents seldom have as much influence over economic cycles as they think, or wish. The U.S. stock market has been strong, but so have the markets in other developed countries. The same goes for GDP. Trump hasn't actually enacted much in the way of policy that would influence economic growth one way or another, though some recent initiatives, such as placing tariffs on foreign solar panels, might actually suppress U.S. growth. His economic team in Davos communicated a totally confused message on the U.S. dollar — Treasury Secretary Steve Mnuchin at first said the U.S. favored a weak dollar (which suppresses imports and spurs exports, but also could ignite domestic inflation), then walked back his remarks as Trump expressed support for a strong dollar.

The ultimate goal of 3%-plus economic growth? It would be a grand achievement if it happens. But it's not the way to bet.”


BTW Canada had the top growth of the Group of 7 without final figures could be slightly over or under3%

https://www.dailykos.com/stories/2018/1/27/1736453/-Trump-didn-t-get-his-3-plus-economic-growth-for-2017-and-is-unlikely-to-in-2018-or-19-or


we dont want massive deportation of anyone. what we want is a DACA deal!!! (something Bush and obama could not get done) combined with a secure border fully appropriated, sensible and responsible and humane immigration reform that will encourage wages to rise for the working poor and lower middle class. with a move to a more merit based immigration system that includes the nuclear family.

I think this is a great deal. an amazing deal. to secure a pathway to citizenship for up to 1.8M being discussed (so it goes beyond DACA) million people already here. They will no longer be in limbo. and as long as they remain crime free and I imagine self sustainable at some level they will earn their citizenship.

Its a fair deal. A deal of Love. and it makes it somewhat merit based as the pathway laid out is over 10-12 years of being crime free and self sustainable at some level.
like i said, its a full rebuild.

Return to Washington Wizards